驾驶员风险水平识别,包括人格特征、人口特征和驾驶行为。

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yu Liu, Tangzhi Liu, Xingliang Liu, Song Wang, Wei Wu, Changjun Wang, Tong Liu
{"title":"驾驶员风险水平识别,包括人格特征、人口特征和驾驶行为。","authors":"Yu Liu, Tangzhi Liu, Xingliang Liu, Song Wang, Wei Wu, Changjun Wang, Tong Liu","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2025.2541901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Human factors have a profound influence on the prevalence of vehicle crashes, particularly among high-risk drivers. This study aims to develop a driver risk-level identification method to effectively evaluate the safety of drivers and design training programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The personality traits of 50 drivers were quantitatively evaluated using the Symptom Checklist-90 scale, with parallel documentation of demographic information. A tri-level risk categorization (low, medium, and high) was established for drivers based on risky driving behaviors investigated <i>via</i> field tests. Correlations between driver personality traits, demographic characteristics, and risk levels were systematically analyzed. Driver risk-level identification models were developed utilizing four machine learning algorithms: support vector machines, classification and regression tree, eXtreme gradient boosting, and multi-layer perceptron, with the relevant personality traits and demographic characteristics serving as predictor inputs. Evaluation indicators were tested to determine the optimal method for driver risk-level identification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Factors such as sex, obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression, anxiety, hostility, and paranoid ideation are significantly correlated with driver risk levels. Furthermore, all four models have a recall of 100%, demonstrating high efficacy in identifying high-risk drivers. Among the four methods, the multi-layer perceptron model achieves the highest overall accuracy (86.7%) and F1-score (87.0%), along with a precision of 90.5% and a recall of 86.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, personality traits and demographic characteristics play a crucial role in understanding driver risk levels, offering new insights to improve driver safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Driver risk-level identification incorporating personality traits, demographic characteristics, and driving behaviors.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Liu, Tangzhi Liu, Xingliang Liu, Song Wang, Wei Wu, Changjun Wang, Tong Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15389588.2025.2541901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Human factors have a profound influence on the prevalence of vehicle crashes, particularly among high-risk drivers. This study aims to develop a driver risk-level identification method to effectively evaluate the safety of drivers and design training programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The personality traits of 50 drivers were quantitatively evaluated using the Symptom Checklist-90 scale, with parallel documentation of demographic information. A tri-level risk categorization (low, medium, and high) was established for drivers based on risky driving behaviors investigated <i>via</i> field tests. Correlations between driver personality traits, demographic characteristics, and risk levels were systematically analyzed. Driver risk-level identification models were developed utilizing four machine learning algorithms: support vector machines, classification and regression tree, eXtreme gradient boosting, and multi-layer perceptron, with the relevant personality traits and demographic characteristics serving as predictor inputs. Evaluation indicators were tested to determine the optimal method for driver risk-level identification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Factors such as sex, obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression, anxiety, hostility, and paranoid ideation are significantly correlated with driver risk levels. Furthermore, all four models have a recall of 100%, demonstrating high efficacy in identifying high-risk drivers. Among the four methods, the multi-layer perceptron model achieves the highest overall accuracy (86.7%) and F1-score (87.0%), along with a precision of 90.5% and a recall of 86.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, personality traits and demographic characteristics play a crucial role in understanding driver risk levels, offering new insights to improve driver safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2541901\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2541901","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:人为因素对车辆碰撞的发生率有深远的影响,特别是在高危驾驶员中。本研究旨在建立驾驶人风险等级辨识方法,以有效评估驾驶人的安全及设计训练方案。方法:采用症状表-90量表对50名驾驶人的人格特征进行定量评价,并对人口学资料进行平行记录。基于现场试验调查的驾驶员危险驾驶行为,建立了低、中、高三级风险分类。系统分析驾驶员人格特征、人口学特征与危险水平之间的相关性。利用支持向量机、分类与回归树、极端梯度增强和多层感知器四种机器学习算法建立了驾驶员风险水平识别模型,并将相关人格特征和人口统计学特征作为预测输入。对评价指标进行检验,确定驾驶员风险等级识别的最佳方法。结果:性别、强迫症、抑郁、焦虑、敌意、偏执等因素与驾驶员危险水平显著相关。此外,所有四种车型的召回率均为100%,表明在识别高风险驾驶员方面具有很高的效率。在四种方法中,多层感知器模型的总体准确率最高(86.7%),f1得分最高(87.0%),精密度为90.5%,召回率为86.7%。结论:总体而言,人格特征和人口统计学特征在理解驾驶员风险水平方面发挥着至关重要的作用,为提高驾驶员安全提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Driver risk-level identification incorporating personality traits, demographic characteristics, and driving behaviors.

Objective: Human factors have a profound influence on the prevalence of vehicle crashes, particularly among high-risk drivers. This study aims to develop a driver risk-level identification method to effectively evaluate the safety of drivers and design training programs.

Methods: The personality traits of 50 drivers were quantitatively evaluated using the Symptom Checklist-90 scale, with parallel documentation of demographic information. A tri-level risk categorization (low, medium, and high) was established for drivers based on risky driving behaviors investigated via field tests. Correlations between driver personality traits, demographic characteristics, and risk levels were systematically analyzed. Driver risk-level identification models were developed utilizing four machine learning algorithms: support vector machines, classification and regression tree, eXtreme gradient boosting, and multi-layer perceptron, with the relevant personality traits and demographic characteristics serving as predictor inputs. Evaluation indicators were tested to determine the optimal method for driver risk-level identification.

Results: Factors such as sex, obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression, anxiety, hostility, and paranoid ideation are significantly correlated with driver risk levels. Furthermore, all four models have a recall of 100%, demonstrating high efficacy in identifying high-risk drivers. Among the four methods, the multi-layer perceptron model achieves the highest overall accuracy (86.7%) and F1-score (87.0%), along with a precision of 90.5% and a recall of 86.7%.

Conclusion: Overall, personality traits and demographic characteristics play a crucial role in understanding driver risk levels, offering new insights to improve driver safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信