Yu Liu, Tangzhi Liu, Xingliang Liu, Song Wang, Wei Wu, Changjun Wang, Tong Liu
{"title":"驾驶员风险水平识别,包括人格特征、人口特征和驾驶行为。","authors":"Yu Liu, Tangzhi Liu, Xingliang Liu, Song Wang, Wei Wu, Changjun Wang, Tong Liu","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2025.2541901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Human factors have a profound influence on the prevalence of vehicle crashes, particularly among high-risk drivers. This study aims to develop a driver risk-level identification method to effectively evaluate the safety of drivers and design training programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The personality traits of 50 drivers were quantitatively evaluated using the Symptom Checklist-90 scale, with parallel documentation of demographic information. A tri-level risk categorization (low, medium, and high) was established for drivers based on risky driving behaviors investigated <i>via</i> field tests. Correlations between driver personality traits, demographic characteristics, and risk levels were systematically analyzed. Driver risk-level identification models were developed utilizing four machine learning algorithms: support vector machines, classification and regression tree, eXtreme gradient boosting, and multi-layer perceptron, with the relevant personality traits and demographic characteristics serving as predictor inputs. Evaluation indicators were tested to determine the optimal method for driver risk-level identification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Factors such as sex, obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression, anxiety, hostility, and paranoid ideation are significantly correlated with driver risk levels. Furthermore, all four models have a recall of 100%, demonstrating high efficacy in identifying high-risk drivers. Among the four methods, the multi-layer perceptron model achieves the highest overall accuracy (86.7%) and F1-score (87.0%), along with a precision of 90.5% and a recall of 86.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, personality traits and demographic characteristics play a crucial role in understanding driver risk levels, offering new insights to improve driver safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Driver risk-level identification incorporating personality traits, demographic characteristics, and driving behaviors.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Liu, Tangzhi Liu, Xingliang Liu, Song Wang, Wei Wu, Changjun Wang, Tong Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15389588.2025.2541901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Human factors have a profound influence on the prevalence of vehicle crashes, particularly among high-risk drivers. This study aims to develop a driver risk-level identification method to effectively evaluate the safety of drivers and design training programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The personality traits of 50 drivers were quantitatively evaluated using the Symptom Checklist-90 scale, with parallel documentation of demographic information. A tri-level risk categorization (low, medium, and high) was established for drivers based on risky driving behaviors investigated <i>via</i> field tests. Correlations between driver personality traits, demographic characteristics, and risk levels were systematically analyzed. Driver risk-level identification models were developed utilizing four machine learning algorithms: support vector machines, classification and regression tree, eXtreme gradient boosting, and multi-layer perceptron, with the relevant personality traits and demographic characteristics serving as predictor inputs. Evaluation indicators were tested to determine the optimal method for driver risk-level identification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Factors such as sex, obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression, anxiety, hostility, and paranoid ideation are significantly correlated with driver risk levels. Furthermore, all four models have a recall of 100%, demonstrating high efficacy in identifying high-risk drivers. Among the four methods, the multi-layer perceptron model achieves the highest overall accuracy (86.7%) and F1-score (87.0%), along with a precision of 90.5% and a recall of 86.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, personality traits and demographic characteristics play a crucial role in understanding driver risk levels, offering new insights to improve driver safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2541901\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2541901","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Human factors have a profound influence on the prevalence of vehicle crashes, particularly among high-risk drivers. This study aims to develop a driver risk-level identification method to effectively evaluate the safety of drivers and design training programs.
Methods: The personality traits of 50 drivers were quantitatively evaluated using the Symptom Checklist-90 scale, with parallel documentation of demographic information. A tri-level risk categorization (low, medium, and high) was established for drivers based on risky driving behaviors investigated via field tests. Correlations between driver personality traits, demographic characteristics, and risk levels were systematically analyzed. Driver risk-level identification models were developed utilizing four machine learning algorithms: support vector machines, classification and regression tree, eXtreme gradient boosting, and multi-layer perceptron, with the relevant personality traits and demographic characteristics serving as predictor inputs. Evaluation indicators were tested to determine the optimal method for driver risk-level identification.
Results: Factors such as sex, obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression, anxiety, hostility, and paranoid ideation are significantly correlated with driver risk levels. Furthermore, all four models have a recall of 100%, demonstrating high efficacy in identifying high-risk drivers. Among the four methods, the multi-layer perceptron model achieves the highest overall accuracy (86.7%) and F1-score (87.0%), along with a precision of 90.5% and a recall of 86.7%.
Conclusion: Overall, personality traits and demographic characteristics play a crucial role in understanding driver risk levels, offering new insights to improve driver safety.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment.
General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.