Dan Han, Xinli Ma, Jiayue Gao, Ziwei Xu, Ziwei Xu, Fa Liu
{"title":"非球面单焦点人工晶状体与Tecnis ZMB00多焦点人工晶状体治疗老年性白内障的临床疗效比较。","authors":"Dan Han, Xinli Ma, Jiayue Gao, Ziwei Xu, Ziwei Xu, Fa Liu","doi":"10.47391/JPMA.21014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the clinical effects and outcomes in patients implanted with aspheric monofocal and multifocal intraocular lens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted from January 2020 to January 2023 at Harbin 242 Hospital in China, using a prospective randomized case-control design. The research subjects were hospitalized patients with age-related cataracts, randomly divided into a control group A receiving single focus intraocular lenses and an intervention group B receiving multi focus intraocular lenses. The visual acuity, visual quality, glasses independence rate, vision related quality of life, and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 25 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 100 patients, 50(50%) were in group A; 28(56%) females and 22(44%) males with mean age 63.25±7.59 years. The other 50(50%) patients were in group B; 26(52%) females and 24(48%) males with mean age 62.03±6.74 years (p>0.05). Group B patients had higher uncorrected visual acuity at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months post-surgery (p<0.05), higher vision-related quality of life at 3 months post-surgery (p<0.05), and higher rate of spectacle independence (p<0.05) than group A. However, group B had lower modulation transfer function at 30 and 45 cycles per degree, and lower contrast sensitivity function at 3 and 6 cycles per degree than group A (p<0.05). The incidence of halo and glare in group B was higher than group A (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The multifocal intraocular lens outperformed the aspherical monofocal intraocular lens in improving the vision-related quality of life and rate of spectacle independence. However, it had dark vision defects and optical side-effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":54369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association","volume":"75 8","pages":"1229-1234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of clinical effects of aspherical monofocal and Tecnis ZMB00 multifocal intraocular lenses in patients with age-related cataract.\",\"authors\":\"Dan Han, Xinli Ma, Jiayue Gao, Ziwei Xu, Ziwei Xu, Fa Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.47391/JPMA.21014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the clinical effects and outcomes in patients implanted with aspheric monofocal and multifocal intraocular lens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted from January 2020 to January 2023 at Harbin 242 Hospital in China, using a prospective randomized case-control design. The research subjects were hospitalized patients with age-related cataracts, randomly divided into a control group A receiving single focus intraocular lenses and an intervention group B receiving multi focus intraocular lenses. The visual acuity, visual quality, glasses independence rate, vision related quality of life, and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 25 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 100 patients, 50(50%) were in group A; 28(56%) females and 22(44%) males with mean age 63.25±7.59 years. The other 50(50%) patients were in group B; 26(52%) females and 24(48%) males with mean age 62.03±6.74 years (p>0.05). Group B patients had higher uncorrected visual acuity at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months post-surgery (p<0.05), higher vision-related quality of life at 3 months post-surgery (p<0.05), and higher rate of spectacle independence (p<0.05) than group A. However, group B had lower modulation transfer function at 30 and 45 cycles per degree, and lower contrast sensitivity function at 3 and 6 cycles per degree than group A (p<0.05). The incidence of halo and glare in group B was higher than group A (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The multifocal intraocular lens outperformed the aspherical monofocal intraocular lens in improving the vision-related quality of life and rate of spectacle independence. However, it had dark vision defects and optical side-effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"75 8\",\"pages\":\"1229-1234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.21014\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.21014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of clinical effects of aspherical monofocal and Tecnis ZMB00 multifocal intraocular lenses in patients with age-related cataract.
Objective: To compare the clinical effects and outcomes in patients implanted with aspheric monofocal and multifocal intraocular lens.
Methods: This study was conducted from January 2020 to January 2023 at Harbin 242 Hospital in China, using a prospective randomized case-control design. The research subjects were hospitalized patients with age-related cataracts, randomly divided into a control group A receiving single focus intraocular lenses and an intervention group B receiving multi focus intraocular lenses. The visual acuity, visual quality, glasses independence rate, vision related quality of life, and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 25 software.
Results: Of the 100 patients, 50(50%) were in group A; 28(56%) females and 22(44%) males with mean age 63.25±7.59 years. The other 50(50%) patients were in group B; 26(52%) females and 24(48%) males with mean age 62.03±6.74 years (p>0.05). Group B patients had higher uncorrected visual acuity at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months post-surgery (p<0.05), higher vision-related quality of life at 3 months post-surgery (p<0.05), and higher rate of spectacle independence (p<0.05) than group A. However, group B had lower modulation transfer function at 30 and 45 cycles per degree, and lower contrast sensitivity function at 3 and 6 cycles per degree than group A (p<0.05). The incidence of halo and glare in group B was higher than group A (p<0.05).
Conclusions: The multifocal intraocular lens outperformed the aspherical monofocal intraocular lens in improving the vision-related quality of life and rate of spectacle independence. However, it had dark vision defects and optical side-effects.
期刊介绍:
Primarily being a medical journal, JPMA publishes scholarly research focusing on the various fields in the areas of health and medical education. It publishes original research describing recent advances in health particularly clinical studies, clinical trials, assessments of pathogens of diagnostic importance, medical genetics and epidemiological studies. Review articles highlighting importance of various issues in the domain of public health, drug research and medical education are also accepted. As a leading journal of South Asia, JPMA remains cognizant of the recent advances in the rapidly growing fields of biomedical sciences, it invites and encourages scholars to write short reviews and invited editorials on the emerging issues. We particularly aim to promote health standards of developing countries by encouraging manuscript submissions on issues affecting the public health and health delivery services.