{"title":"弹性和非弹性杠铃单腿硬举时下肢COP和肌肉激活的比较。","authors":"Jihwan Jeong, Ilbong Park","doi":"10.3390/sports13080242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate how barbell type (elastic vs. inelastic) and lifting speed affect postural stability and lower limb muscle activation during the single-leg deadlift (SLDL), a common unilateral exercise in rehabilitation and performance training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-seven healthy adults performed SLDLs using both elastic and inelastic barbells under three lifting speeds (normal, fast, and power). Center of pressure (COP) displacement in the anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) directions and electromyographic (EMG) activity of eight lower limb muscles were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>COP displacement was significantly lower when using elastic barbells (AP: F = 6.509, <i>p</i> = 0.017, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.200, ω<sup>2</sup> = 0.164; ML: F = 9.996, <i>p</i> = 0.004, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.278, ω<sup>2</sup> = 0.243). EMG activation was significantly higher for the gluteus medius, biceps femoris, semitendinosus, and gastrocnemius (all <i>p</i> < 0.01), especially under power conditions. Significant interactions between barbell type and speed were found for the gluteus medius (F = 13.737, <i>p</i> < 0.001, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.346, ω<sup>2</sup> = 0.176), semitendinosus (F = 6.757, <i>p</i> = 0.002, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.206, ω<sup>2</sup> = 0.080), and tibialis anterior (F = 3.617, <i>p</i> = 0.034, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.122, ω<sup>2</sup> = 0.029).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that elastic barbells improve postural control and enhance neuromuscular activation during the SLDL, particularly at higher speeds. These results support the integration of elastic resistance in dynamic balance and injury prevention programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"13 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12390621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Lower Limb COP and Muscle Activation During Single-Leg Deadlift Using Elastic and Inelastic Barbells.\",\"authors\":\"Jihwan Jeong, Ilbong Park\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/sports13080242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate how barbell type (elastic vs. inelastic) and lifting speed affect postural stability and lower limb muscle activation during the single-leg deadlift (SLDL), a common unilateral exercise in rehabilitation and performance training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-seven healthy adults performed SLDLs using both elastic and inelastic barbells under three lifting speeds (normal, fast, and power). Center of pressure (COP) displacement in the anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) directions and electromyographic (EMG) activity of eight lower limb muscles were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>COP displacement was significantly lower when using elastic barbells (AP: F = 6.509, <i>p</i> = 0.017, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.200, ω<sup>2</sup> = 0.164; ML: F = 9.996, <i>p</i> = 0.004, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.278, ω<sup>2</sup> = 0.243). EMG activation was significantly higher for the gluteus medius, biceps femoris, semitendinosus, and gastrocnemius (all <i>p</i> < 0.01), especially under power conditions. Significant interactions between barbell type and speed were found for the gluteus medius (F = 13.737, <i>p</i> < 0.001, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.346, ω<sup>2</sup> = 0.176), semitendinosus (F = 6.757, <i>p</i> = 0.002, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.206, ω<sup>2</sup> = 0.080), and tibialis anterior (F = 3.617, <i>p</i> = 0.034, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.122, ω<sup>2</sup> = 0.029).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that elastic barbells improve postural control and enhance neuromuscular activation during the SLDL, particularly at higher speeds. These results support the integration of elastic resistance in dynamic balance and injury prevention programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports\",\"volume\":\"13 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12390621/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13080242\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13080242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究旨在探讨杠铃类型(弹性与非弹性)和举重速度对单腿硬举(SLDL)中姿势稳定性和下肢肌肉激活的影响。单腿硬举是康复和性能训练中常见的单侧运动。方法:27名健康成人使用弹性和非弹性杠铃在正常、快速和力量三种举起速度下进行SLDLs。测量8块下肢肌肉前后(AP)、中外侧(ML)方向的压力中心(COP)位移和肌电图(EMG)活动。结果:弹性杠铃可显著降低COP位移(AP: F = 6.509, p = 0.017, η2 = 0.200, ω2 = 0.164; ML: F = 9.996, p = 0.004, η2 = 0.278, ω2 = 0.243)。臀中肌、股二头肌、半腱肌和腓肠肌的肌电活动显著升高(p < 0.01),尤其是在动力条件下。在臀中肌(F = 13.737, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.346, ω2 = 0.176)、半腱肌(F = 6.757, p = 0.002, η2 = 0.206, ω2 = 0.080)和胫骨前肌(F = 3.617, p = 0.034, η2 = 0.122, ω2 = 0.029)中,杠铃类型与速度之间存在显著的交互作用。结论:研究结果表明,弹性杠铃改善了SLDL期间的姿势控制,并增强了神经肌肉的激活,特别是在更高的速度下。这些结果支持弹性阻力在动态平衡和伤害预防计划的整合。
Comparison of Lower Limb COP and Muscle Activation During Single-Leg Deadlift Using Elastic and Inelastic Barbells.
Background: This study aimed to investigate how barbell type (elastic vs. inelastic) and lifting speed affect postural stability and lower limb muscle activation during the single-leg deadlift (SLDL), a common unilateral exercise in rehabilitation and performance training.
Methods: Twenty-seven healthy adults performed SLDLs using both elastic and inelastic barbells under three lifting speeds (normal, fast, and power). Center of pressure (COP) displacement in the anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) directions and electromyographic (EMG) activity of eight lower limb muscles were measured.
Results: COP displacement was significantly lower when using elastic barbells (AP: F = 6.509, p = 0.017, η2 = 0.200, ω2 = 0.164; ML: F = 9.996, p = 0.004, η2 = 0.278, ω2 = 0.243). EMG activation was significantly higher for the gluteus medius, biceps femoris, semitendinosus, and gastrocnemius (all p < 0.01), especially under power conditions. Significant interactions between barbell type and speed were found for the gluteus medius (F = 13.737, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.346, ω2 = 0.176), semitendinosus (F = 6.757, p = 0.002, η2 = 0.206, ω2 = 0.080), and tibialis anterior (F = 3.617, p = 0.034, η2 = 0.122, ω2 = 0.029).
Conclusions: The findings suggest that elastic barbells improve postural control and enhance neuromuscular activation during the SLDL, particularly at higher speeds. These results support the integration of elastic resistance in dynamic balance and injury prevention programs.