分类器与密度网模型相结合用于肺癌ct图像分类的比较分析。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Menna Allah Mahmoud, Sijun Wu, Ruihua Su, Yanhua Wen, Shuya Liu, Yubao Guan
{"title":"分类器与密度网模型相结合用于肺癌ct图像分类的比较分析。","authors":"Menna Allah Mahmoud, Sijun Wu, Ruihua Su, Yanhua Wen, Shuya Liu, Yubao Guan","doi":"10.2174/0115734056399377250818100506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. While deep learning approaches show promise in medical imaging, comprehensive comparisons of classifier combinations with DenseNet architectures for lung cancer classification are limited. The study investigates the performance of different classifier combinations, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), with DenseNet architectures for lung cancer classification using chest CT scan images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comparative analysis was conducted on 1,000 chest CT scan images comprising Adenocarcinoma, Large Cell Carcinoma, Squamous Cell Carcinoma, and normal tissue samples. Three DenseNet variants (DenseNet-121, DenseNet-169, DenseNet-201) were combined with three classifiers: SVM, ANN, and MLP. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, Area Under the Curve (AUC), precision, recall, specificity, and F1- score with an 80-20 train-test split.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal model achieved 92% training accuracy and 83% test accuracy. Performance across models ranged from 81% to 92% for training accuracy and 73% to 83% for test accuracy. The most balanced combination demonstrated robust results (training: 85% accuracy, 0.99 AUC; test: 79% accuracy, 0.95 AUC) with minimal overfitting.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Deep learning approaches effectively categorize chest CT scans for lung cancer detection. The MLP-DenseNet-169 combination's 83% test accuracy represents a promising benchmark. Limitations include retrospective design and a limited sample size from a single source.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness of combining DenseNet architectures with different classifiers for lung cancer CT classification. The MLP-DenseNet-169 achieved optimal performance, while SVM-DenseNet-169 showed superior stability, providing valuable benchmarks for automated lung cancer detection systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":54215,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classifiers Combined with DenseNet Models for Lung Cancer Computed Tomography Image Classification: A Comparative Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Menna Allah Mahmoud, Sijun Wu, Ruihua Su, Yanhua Wen, Shuya Liu, Yubao Guan\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115734056399377250818100506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. While deep learning approaches show promise in medical imaging, comprehensive comparisons of classifier combinations with DenseNet architectures for lung cancer classification are limited. The study investigates the performance of different classifier combinations, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), with DenseNet architectures for lung cancer classification using chest CT scan images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comparative analysis was conducted on 1,000 chest CT scan images comprising Adenocarcinoma, Large Cell Carcinoma, Squamous Cell Carcinoma, and normal tissue samples. Three DenseNet variants (DenseNet-121, DenseNet-169, DenseNet-201) were combined with three classifiers: SVM, ANN, and MLP. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, Area Under the Curve (AUC), precision, recall, specificity, and F1- score with an 80-20 train-test split.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal model achieved 92% training accuracy and 83% test accuracy. Performance across models ranged from 81% to 92% for training accuracy and 73% to 83% for test accuracy. The most balanced combination demonstrated robust results (training: 85% accuracy, 0.99 AUC; test: 79% accuracy, 0.95 AUC) with minimal overfitting.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Deep learning approaches effectively categorize chest CT scans for lung cancer detection. The MLP-DenseNet-169 combination's 83% test accuracy represents a promising benchmark. Limitations include retrospective design and a limited sample size from a single source.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness of combining DenseNet architectures with different classifiers for lung cancer CT classification. The MLP-DenseNet-169 achieved optimal performance, while SVM-DenseNet-169 showed superior stability, providing valuable benchmarks for automated lung cancer detection systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Imaging Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Imaging Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056399377250818100506\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056399377250818100506","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肺癌仍然是世界范围内癌症相关死亡的主要原因。虽然深度学习方法在医学成像方面显示出前景,但分类器组合与DenseNet架构在肺癌分类方面的综合比较是有限的。该研究研究了不同分类器组合的性能,支持向量机(SVM),人工神经网络(ANN)和多层感知器(MLP),与DenseNet架构一起使用胸部CT扫描图像进行肺癌分类。方法:对1000例胸部CT扫描图像进行对比分析,包括腺癌、大细胞癌、鳞状细胞癌和正常组织样本。三个DenseNet变体(DenseNet-121, DenseNet-169, DenseNet-201)与三个分类器(SVM, ANN和MLP)相结合。使用准确性、曲线下面积(AUC)、精密度、召回率、特异性和F1分数(80-20训练测试分割)来评估性能。结果:最优模型的训练准确率为92%,测试准确率为83%。模型的训练准确率从81%到92%,测试准确率从73%到83%。最平衡的组合在最小的过拟合下显示出稳健的结果(训练:85%准确度,0.99 AUC;测试:79%准确度,0.95 AUC)。讨论:深度学习方法有效分类胸部CT扫描肺癌检测。MLP-DenseNet-169组合83%的测试准确度代表了一个有前途的基准。局限性包括回顾性设计和单一来源的有限样本量。结论:本评价验证了DenseNet结构与不同分类器结合用于肺癌CT分类的有效性。MLP-DenseNet-169获得了最佳性能,而SVM-DenseNet-169表现出卓越的稳定性,为自动化肺癌检测系统提供了有价值的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Classifiers Combined with DenseNet Models for Lung Cancer Computed Tomography Image Classification: A Comparative Analysis.

Introduction: Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. While deep learning approaches show promise in medical imaging, comprehensive comparisons of classifier combinations with DenseNet architectures for lung cancer classification are limited. The study investigates the performance of different classifier combinations, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), with DenseNet architectures for lung cancer classification using chest CT scan images.

Methods: A comparative analysis was conducted on 1,000 chest CT scan images comprising Adenocarcinoma, Large Cell Carcinoma, Squamous Cell Carcinoma, and normal tissue samples. Three DenseNet variants (DenseNet-121, DenseNet-169, DenseNet-201) were combined with three classifiers: SVM, ANN, and MLP. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, Area Under the Curve (AUC), precision, recall, specificity, and F1- score with an 80-20 train-test split.

Results: The optimal model achieved 92% training accuracy and 83% test accuracy. Performance across models ranged from 81% to 92% for training accuracy and 73% to 83% for test accuracy. The most balanced combination demonstrated robust results (training: 85% accuracy, 0.99 AUC; test: 79% accuracy, 0.95 AUC) with minimal overfitting.

Discussion: Deep learning approaches effectively categorize chest CT scans for lung cancer detection. The MLP-DenseNet-169 combination's 83% test accuracy represents a promising benchmark. Limitations include retrospective design and a limited sample size from a single source.

Conclusion: This evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness of combining DenseNet architectures with different classifiers for lung cancer CT classification. The MLP-DenseNet-169 achieved optimal performance, while SVM-DenseNet-169 showed superior stability, providing valuable benchmarks for automated lung cancer detection systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
246
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Medical Imaging Reviews publishes frontier review articles, original research articles, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on medical imaging dedicated to clinical research. All relevant areas are covered by the journal, including advances in the diagnosis, instrumentation and therapeutic applications related to all modern medical imaging techniques. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers involved in medical imaging and diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信