游戏处方:在联邦合格的健康中心实施儿童游戏促进干预。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Rebecca L Emery Tavernier, May Oo, Shelby Anderson-Badbade, Lynsey G Huppe, Peyton Rogers, Ho-Choong Chang, Randall W Grout, Sal Anzalone, Kelechi Ngwangwa, Joan East, Jan Lee Santos, Mandy Lamb
{"title":"游戏处方:在联邦合格的健康中心实施儿童游戏促进干预。","authors":"Rebecca L Emery Tavernier, May Oo, Shelby Anderson-Badbade, Lynsey G Huppe, Peyton Rogers, Ho-Choong Chang, Randall W Grout, Sal Anzalone, Kelechi Ngwangwa, Joan East, Jan Lee Santos, Mandy Lamb","doi":"10.1177/13674935251375123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prescription for Play (P4P) is a social impact program delivered during 18-36-month well-child checks to promote caregiver-directed play. To understand the impact of P4P on caregiver outcomes and whether it can be feasibly delivered in safety-net settings, this research evaluated P4P's implementation across six federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). The association of P4P on caregiver outcomes was assessed using an interrupted time series design in which two separate caregiver samples completed surveys before <i>(n = 180)</i> and after <i>(n = 262</i>) P4P implementation. Implementation of P4P was further assessed using a mixed methods evaluation of 27 staff surveys, 25 staff interviews, and 44 clinic observations. Caregivers reported positive views towards play and a strong desire to play with their children before and after P4P implementation; independent samples t-tests showed that group differences were not statistically significant for any survey construct. Triangulation of quantitative and qualitative implementation data showed that P4P can be implemented as designed within varied FQHC settings and is acceptable among clinic staff. AlthoughP4P does not appear to influence caregivers' positive views of and strong investment in play, this study offers important evidence that P4P can be implemented to fidelity within FQHCs, supporting its feasibility for delivery in safety-net settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":54388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"13674935251375123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescription for Play: Implementing a pediatric play promotion intervention in federally qualified health centers.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca L Emery Tavernier, May Oo, Shelby Anderson-Badbade, Lynsey G Huppe, Peyton Rogers, Ho-Choong Chang, Randall W Grout, Sal Anzalone, Kelechi Ngwangwa, Joan East, Jan Lee Santos, Mandy Lamb\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13674935251375123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prescription for Play (P4P) is a social impact program delivered during 18-36-month well-child checks to promote caregiver-directed play. To understand the impact of P4P on caregiver outcomes and whether it can be feasibly delivered in safety-net settings, this research evaluated P4P's implementation across six federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). The association of P4P on caregiver outcomes was assessed using an interrupted time series design in which two separate caregiver samples completed surveys before <i>(n = 180)</i> and after <i>(n = 262</i>) P4P implementation. Implementation of P4P was further assessed using a mixed methods evaluation of 27 staff surveys, 25 staff interviews, and 44 clinic observations. Caregivers reported positive views towards play and a strong desire to play with their children before and after P4P implementation; independent samples t-tests showed that group differences were not statistically significant for any survey construct. Triangulation of quantitative and qualitative implementation data showed that P4P can be implemented as designed within varied FQHC settings and is acceptable among clinic staff. AlthoughP4P does not appear to influence caregivers' positive views of and strong investment in play, this study offers important evidence that P4P can be implemented to fidelity within FQHCs, supporting its feasibility for delivery in safety-net settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Child Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13674935251375123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Child Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13674935251375123\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13674935251375123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

游戏处方(P4P)是一项社会影响计划,在18-36个月的健康儿童检查期间提供,以促进照顾者指导的游戏。为了了解P4P对护理人员结果的影响,以及它是否可以在安全网设置中实现,本研究评估了P4P在六个联邦合格医疗中心(fqhc)的实施情况。采用中断时间序列设计评估P4P与护理人员预后的关系,其中两个独立的护理人员样本在实施P4P之前(n = 180)和之后(n = 262)完成调查。通过27份工作人员调查、25份工作人员访谈和44份临床观察的混合方法,进一步评估P4P的实施情况。看护人报告说,在实施P4P之前和之后,他们对玩耍持积极态度,并强烈希望与孩子一起玩耍;独立样本t检验显示,任何调查结构的组间差异均无统计学意义。定量和定性实施数据的三角测量表明,P4P可以在不同的FQHC环境中按照设计实施,并且在临床工作人员中是可接受的。尽管P4P似乎并不影响照顾者对游戏的积极看法和强烈投资,但本研究提供了重要的证据,表明P4P可以在fqhc中实施,以提高保真度,支持其在安全网设置中交付的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prescription for Play: Implementing a pediatric play promotion intervention in federally qualified health centers.

Prescription for Play (P4P) is a social impact program delivered during 18-36-month well-child checks to promote caregiver-directed play. To understand the impact of P4P on caregiver outcomes and whether it can be feasibly delivered in safety-net settings, this research evaluated P4P's implementation across six federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). The association of P4P on caregiver outcomes was assessed using an interrupted time series design in which two separate caregiver samples completed surveys before (n = 180) and after (n = 262) P4P implementation. Implementation of P4P was further assessed using a mixed methods evaluation of 27 staff surveys, 25 staff interviews, and 44 clinic observations. Caregivers reported positive views towards play and a strong desire to play with their children before and after P4P implementation; independent samples t-tests showed that group differences were not statistically significant for any survey construct. Triangulation of quantitative and qualitative implementation data showed that P4P can be implemented as designed within varied FQHC settings and is acceptable among clinic staff. AlthoughP4P does not appear to influence caregivers' positive views of and strong investment in play, this study offers important evidence that P4P can be implemented to fidelity within FQHCs, supporting its feasibility for delivery in safety-net settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Child Health Care
Journal of Child Health Care NURSING-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.80%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Child Health Care is a broad ranging, international, professionally-oriented, interdisciplinary and peer reviewed journal. It focuses on issues related to the health and health care of neonates, children, young people and their families, including areas such as illness, disability, complex needs, well-being, quality of life and mental health care in a diverse range of settings. The Journal of Child Health Care publishes original theoretical, empirical and review papers which have application to a wide variety of disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信