{"title":"数字医疗工具的文化适应:护理人员和患者的横断面调查。","authors":"Shuya Zhou, Muzi Shen, Xinge Tao, Shasha Han","doi":"10.1186/s41256-025-00439-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimizing the cultural accessibility of digital healthcare tools requires understanding user perspectives on usability features and cultural appropriateness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of 3,030 caregivers (mean age 44.0, 52.9% female) and 2,108 inpatients (mean age 49.7, 54.0% female) at a Guangxi medical center (July-October 2024) assessed experiences with digital tools, support needs, and preferences for culturally adaptive features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Caregivers reported a higher adoption of digital tools than patients (caregivers: 87.1% vs. patients: 62.0%, P-value < .001), yet 81.1% of caregivers reported unmet needs. Both groups (caregivers: 67.0%; patients: 64.0%) prioritized integrating traditional medicine over other cultural factors (language diversity, traditional medicine, folk customs, and medical resource availability). Caregivers valued interactive health management tools (73.3% vs. 66.7% among patients, P-value < .001) and user feedback mechanisms (61.2% vs. 55.0% among patients, P-value < .001) more than patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite high adoption, caregivers report significant gaps in culturally relevant support. Digital health interventions should prioritize user-centered designs, incorporating traditional medicine and addressing the divergent preferences of caregivers and patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":52405,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Research and Policy","volume":"10 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultural adaptation of digital healthcare tools: a cross-sectional survey of caregivers and patients.\",\"authors\":\"Shuya Zhou, Muzi Shen, Xinge Tao, Shasha Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41256-025-00439-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimizing the cultural accessibility of digital healthcare tools requires understanding user perspectives on usability features and cultural appropriateness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of 3,030 caregivers (mean age 44.0, 52.9% female) and 2,108 inpatients (mean age 49.7, 54.0% female) at a Guangxi medical center (July-October 2024) assessed experiences with digital tools, support needs, and preferences for culturally adaptive features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Caregivers reported a higher adoption of digital tools than patients (caregivers: 87.1% vs. patients: 62.0%, P-value < .001), yet 81.1% of caregivers reported unmet needs. Both groups (caregivers: 67.0%; patients: 64.0%) prioritized integrating traditional medicine over other cultural factors (language diversity, traditional medicine, folk customs, and medical resource availability). Caregivers valued interactive health management tools (73.3% vs. 66.7% among patients, P-value < .001) and user feedback mechanisms (61.2% vs. 55.0% among patients, P-value < .001) more than patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite high adoption, caregivers report significant gaps in culturally relevant support. Digital health interventions should prioritize user-centered designs, incorporating traditional medicine and addressing the divergent preferences of caregivers and patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Health Research and Policy\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369145/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Health Research and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-025-00439-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-025-00439-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cultural adaptation of digital healthcare tools: a cross-sectional survey of caregivers and patients.
Background: Optimizing the cultural accessibility of digital healthcare tools requires understanding user perspectives on usability features and cultural appropriateness.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 3,030 caregivers (mean age 44.0, 52.9% female) and 2,108 inpatients (mean age 49.7, 54.0% female) at a Guangxi medical center (July-October 2024) assessed experiences with digital tools, support needs, and preferences for culturally adaptive features.
Results: Caregivers reported a higher adoption of digital tools than patients (caregivers: 87.1% vs. patients: 62.0%, P-value < .001), yet 81.1% of caregivers reported unmet needs. Both groups (caregivers: 67.0%; patients: 64.0%) prioritized integrating traditional medicine over other cultural factors (language diversity, traditional medicine, folk customs, and medical resource availability). Caregivers valued interactive health management tools (73.3% vs. 66.7% among patients, P-value < .001) and user feedback mechanisms (61.2% vs. 55.0% among patients, P-value < .001) more than patients.
Conclusions: Despite high adoption, caregivers report significant gaps in culturally relevant support. Digital health interventions should prioritize user-centered designs, incorporating traditional medicine and addressing the divergent preferences of caregivers and patients.
期刊介绍:
Global Health Research and Policy, an open-access, multidisciplinary journal, publishes research on various aspects of global health, addressing topics like health equity, health systems and policy, social determinants of health, disease burden, population health, and other urgent global health issues. It serves as a forum for high-quality research focused on regional and global health improvement, emphasizing solutions for health equity.