数字医疗工具的文化适应:护理人员和患者的横断面调查。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shuya Zhou, Muzi Shen, Xinge Tao, Shasha Han
{"title":"数字医疗工具的文化适应:护理人员和患者的横断面调查。","authors":"Shuya Zhou, Muzi Shen, Xinge Tao, Shasha Han","doi":"10.1186/s41256-025-00439-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimizing the cultural accessibility of digital healthcare tools requires understanding user perspectives on usability features and cultural appropriateness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of 3,030 caregivers (mean age 44.0, 52.9% female) and 2,108 inpatients (mean age 49.7, 54.0% female) at a Guangxi medical center (July-October 2024) assessed experiences with digital tools, support needs, and preferences for culturally adaptive features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Caregivers reported a higher adoption of digital tools than patients (caregivers: 87.1% vs. patients: 62.0%, P-value < .001), yet 81.1% of caregivers reported unmet needs. Both groups (caregivers: 67.0%; patients: 64.0%) prioritized integrating traditional medicine over other cultural factors (language diversity, traditional medicine, folk customs, and medical resource availability). Caregivers valued interactive health management tools (73.3% vs. 66.7% among patients, P-value < .001) and user feedback mechanisms (61.2% vs. 55.0% among patients, P-value < .001) more than patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite high adoption, caregivers report significant gaps in culturally relevant support. Digital health interventions should prioritize user-centered designs, incorporating traditional medicine and addressing the divergent preferences of caregivers and patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":52405,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Research and Policy","volume":"10 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultural adaptation of digital healthcare tools: a cross-sectional survey of caregivers and patients.\",\"authors\":\"Shuya Zhou, Muzi Shen, Xinge Tao, Shasha Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41256-025-00439-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimizing the cultural accessibility of digital healthcare tools requires understanding user perspectives on usability features and cultural appropriateness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of 3,030 caregivers (mean age 44.0, 52.9% female) and 2,108 inpatients (mean age 49.7, 54.0% female) at a Guangxi medical center (July-October 2024) assessed experiences with digital tools, support needs, and preferences for culturally adaptive features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Caregivers reported a higher adoption of digital tools than patients (caregivers: 87.1% vs. patients: 62.0%, P-value < .001), yet 81.1% of caregivers reported unmet needs. Both groups (caregivers: 67.0%; patients: 64.0%) prioritized integrating traditional medicine over other cultural factors (language diversity, traditional medicine, folk customs, and medical resource availability). Caregivers valued interactive health management tools (73.3% vs. 66.7% among patients, P-value < .001) and user feedback mechanisms (61.2% vs. 55.0% among patients, P-value < .001) more than patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite high adoption, caregivers report significant gaps in culturally relevant support. Digital health interventions should prioritize user-centered designs, incorporating traditional medicine and addressing the divergent preferences of caregivers and patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Health Research and Policy\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369145/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Health Research and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-025-00439-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-025-00439-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:优化数字医疗工具的文化可访问性需要了解用户对可用性特征和文化适宜性的看法。方法:对广西某医疗中心(2024年7月至10月)3030名护理人员(平均年龄44.0岁,女性52.9%)和2108名住院患者(平均年龄49.7岁,女性54.0%)进行横断面调查,评估数字化工具的使用体验、支持需求和文化适应性特征的偏好。结果:护理人员报告的数字工具采用率高于患者(护理人员:87.1%对患者:62.0%,p值结论:尽管采用率高,但护理人员报告的文化相关支持存在显著差距。数字卫生干预措施应优先考虑以用户为中心的设计,结合传统医学并解决护理人员和患者的不同偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cultural adaptation of digital healthcare tools: a cross-sectional survey of caregivers and patients.

Cultural adaptation of digital healthcare tools: a cross-sectional survey of caregivers and patients.

Background: Optimizing the cultural accessibility of digital healthcare tools requires understanding user perspectives on usability features and cultural appropriateness.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 3,030 caregivers (mean age 44.0, 52.9% female) and 2,108 inpatients (mean age 49.7, 54.0% female) at a Guangxi medical center (July-October 2024) assessed experiences with digital tools, support needs, and preferences for culturally adaptive features.

Results: Caregivers reported a higher adoption of digital tools than patients (caregivers: 87.1% vs. patients: 62.0%, P-value < .001), yet 81.1% of caregivers reported unmet needs. Both groups (caregivers: 67.0%; patients: 64.0%) prioritized integrating traditional medicine over other cultural factors (language diversity, traditional medicine, folk customs, and medical resource availability). Caregivers valued interactive health management tools (73.3% vs. 66.7% among patients, P-value < .001) and user feedback mechanisms (61.2% vs. 55.0% among patients, P-value < .001) more than patients.

Conclusions: Despite high adoption, caregivers report significant gaps in culturally relevant support. Digital health interventions should prioritize user-centered designs, incorporating traditional medicine and addressing the divergent preferences of caregivers and patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Health Research and Policy
Global Health Research and Policy Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
1.10%
发文量
43
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Research and Policy, an open-access, multidisciplinary journal, publishes research on various aspects of global health, addressing topics like health equity, health systems and policy, social determinants of health, disease burden, population health, and other urgent global health issues. It serves as a forum for high-quality research focused on regional and global health improvement, emphasizing solutions for health equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信