{"title":"比较全球哮喘倡议指南方法与12岁及以上青少年哮喘控制。","authors":"Danish Abdul Aziz, Werdah Viquar","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2025.3444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines for asthma management in children and adolescents aged 12 years and older present two treatment tracks. Track 1, the preferred option, involves as-needed low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) combined with formoterol. Track 2 involves as-needed ICS with a short-acting β-agonist for step 1 and low-dose maintenance ICS for step 2. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Track 1 and Track 2 in managing asthma in pediatric patients aged 12 years or older. This was a retrospective study that was conducted at Aga Khan University Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan, from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. The study included children and adolescents aged 12 years or older, diagnosed with asthma exacerbations, who were discharged on reliever therapy following the GINA guidelines for steps 1 and 2. Patients were followed for re-admission within 30 days, emergency room (ER) visits, annual admissions, length of stay, and the need for intensive care. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were performed at 1 week and 3 months post-discharge. A total of 90 patients were enrolled and divided into Track 1 (n=43) and Track 2 (n=47). Track 1 patients had significantly fewer readmissions (4.65% vs. 19.15%, p=0.036), fewer ER visits (1.69±1.31 vs. 2.8±1.37, p<0.001), and fewer hospital admissions (1.37±0.85 vs. 2.1±0.84, p<0.001). Track 1 patients also required less intensive care (9.3% vs. 27.66%, p=0.034). PFTs showed greater improvement in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and the FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio for Track 1 compared to Track 2 at three months (p=0.026 and p<0.001, respectively). The study found that treatment with as-needed ICS/formoterol (Track 1) was more effective in managing asthma compared to the alternative treatment strategies in Track 2.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Global Initiative for Asthma guideline approaches to asthma control in adolescents aged 12 and above.\",\"authors\":\"Danish Abdul Aziz, Werdah Viquar\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/monaldi.2025.3444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines for asthma management in children and adolescents aged 12 years and older present two treatment tracks. Track 1, the preferred option, involves as-needed low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) combined with formoterol. Track 2 involves as-needed ICS with a short-acting β-agonist for step 1 and low-dose maintenance ICS for step 2. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Track 1 and Track 2 in managing asthma in pediatric patients aged 12 years or older. This was a retrospective study that was conducted at Aga Khan University Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan, from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. The study included children and adolescents aged 12 years or older, diagnosed with asthma exacerbations, who were discharged on reliever therapy following the GINA guidelines for steps 1 and 2. Patients were followed for re-admission within 30 days, emergency room (ER) visits, annual admissions, length of stay, and the need for intensive care. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were performed at 1 week and 3 months post-discharge. A total of 90 patients were enrolled and divided into Track 1 (n=43) and Track 2 (n=47). Track 1 patients had significantly fewer readmissions (4.65% vs. 19.15%, p=0.036), fewer ER visits (1.69±1.31 vs. 2.8±1.37, p<0.001), and fewer hospital admissions (1.37±0.85 vs. 2.1±0.84, p<0.001). Track 1 patients also required less intensive care (9.3% vs. 27.66%, p=0.034). PFTs showed greater improvement in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and the FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio for Track 1 compared to Track 2 at three months (p=0.026 and p<0.001, respectively). The study found that treatment with as-needed ICS/formoterol (Track 1) was more effective in managing asthma compared to the alternative treatment strategies in Track 2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2025.3444\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2025.3444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
12岁及以上儿童和青少年哮喘管理全球哮喘倡议(GINA)指南提出了两种治疗方法。第一阶段是首选方案,涉及按需低剂量吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)联合福莫特罗。第二阶段包括按需使用短效β激动剂的ICS,以及用于第二阶段的低剂量维持ICS。本研究旨在比较Track 1和Track 2治疗12岁及以上儿童哮喘患者的有效性。这是一项回顾性研究,于2022年1月1日至2023年12月31日在巴基斯坦卡拉奇的阿迦汗大学医院进行。该研究包括12岁或以上的儿童和青少年,诊断为哮喘加重,根据GINA指南第1步和第2步接受缓解治疗出院。随访患者在30天内再次入院、急诊室(ER)就诊、年度入院次数、住院时间和重症监护需求。分别于出院后1周和3个月进行肺功能检查(PFTs)。共有90例患者入组,分为1组(n=43)和2组(n=47)。1组患者再入院率显著降低(4.65% vs. 19.15%, p=0.036),急诊室就诊率显著降低(1.69±1.31 vs. 2.8±1.37,p=0.036)
Comparing Global Initiative for Asthma guideline approaches to asthma control in adolescents aged 12 and above.
The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines for asthma management in children and adolescents aged 12 years and older present two treatment tracks. Track 1, the preferred option, involves as-needed low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) combined with formoterol. Track 2 involves as-needed ICS with a short-acting β-agonist for step 1 and low-dose maintenance ICS for step 2. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Track 1 and Track 2 in managing asthma in pediatric patients aged 12 years or older. This was a retrospective study that was conducted at Aga Khan University Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan, from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. The study included children and adolescents aged 12 years or older, diagnosed with asthma exacerbations, who were discharged on reliever therapy following the GINA guidelines for steps 1 and 2. Patients were followed for re-admission within 30 days, emergency room (ER) visits, annual admissions, length of stay, and the need for intensive care. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were performed at 1 week and 3 months post-discharge. A total of 90 patients were enrolled and divided into Track 1 (n=43) and Track 2 (n=47). Track 1 patients had significantly fewer readmissions (4.65% vs. 19.15%, p=0.036), fewer ER visits (1.69±1.31 vs. 2.8±1.37, p<0.001), and fewer hospital admissions (1.37±0.85 vs. 2.1±0.84, p<0.001). Track 1 patients also required less intensive care (9.3% vs. 27.66%, p=0.034). PFTs showed greater improvement in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and the FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio for Track 1 compared to Track 2 at three months (p=0.026 and p<0.001, respectively). The study found that treatment with as-needed ICS/formoterol (Track 1) was more effective in managing asthma compared to the alternative treatment strategies in Track 2.