Michelle Trivedi, Michelle Spano, Christine Frisard, Sybil Crawford, Grace Ryan, Melissa Goulding, Sonia Radu, Juliana Arenas, Sarah Becker, Layana Al-Halbouni, Jordan Alter, Nancy Byatt, Wanda Phipatanakul, Milagros C Rosal, Stephenie C Lemon, Lynn B Gerald, Lori Pbert
{"title":"一项学校监督治疗改善儿童哮喘控制的试点实用群随机试验。","authors":"Michelle Trivedi, Michelle Spano, Christine Frisard, Sybil Crawford, Grace Ryan, Melissa Goulding, Sonia Radu, Juliana Arenas, Sarah Becker, Layana Al-Halbouni, Jordan Alter, Nancy Byatt, Wanda Phipatanakul, Milagros C Rosal, Stephenie C Lemon, Lynn B Gerald, Lori Pbert","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.07.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although school-supervised inhaled corticosteroid administration has potential to improve asthma morbidity, there has yet to be an evaluation of the pediatric practice as a setting to identify children with asthma and connect them to school-supervised asthma therapy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Conduct a pragmatic pilot trial of Asthma Link, a model that connects children with asthma seen in pediatric practice to supervised asthma therapy in the school setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four pediatric practices were pair-matched and randomized to (1) Asthma Link plus an asthma educational workbook or (2) Enhanced Usual Care, the same workbook alone. We recruited children 6 to 17 years old with poorly controlled asthma, prescribed a daily inhaled corticosteroid. Parent-child dyads completed surveys at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Primary outcomes: </strong>recruitment/retention of pediatric practices and parent-child dyads and intervention fidelity.</p><p><strong>Secondary outcomes: </strong>asthma symptoms, medication adherence, emergency room visits, hospital admissions, oral steroid use, missed schooldays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four pediatric practices and 66 parent-child dyads were recruited (average child age 9 y, 44% female, 65% Hispanic, 23% Black, 62% low income). All (4 of 4) practices were retained throughout the study and retention of parent-child dyads was 95%, 91%, and 89% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. All (31 of 31) Asthma Link families brought their child's preventive inhaler into school; children received school health staff-supervised therapy on more than 95% of schooldays over 12 months. Children in the Asthma Link group had greater improvement in Asthma Control Test scores, longer time to first asthma exacerbation, less oral steroid use, and better medication adherence compared with the Enhanced Usual Care group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Extending the reach of pediatric practices to facilitate the delivery of daily asthma prevention medication at school was feasible and improved pediatric asthma morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380124/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pilot Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial of School-Supervised Therapy to Improve Pediatric Asthma Control.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Trivedi, Michelle Spano, Christine Frisard, Sybil Crawford, Grace Ryan, Melissa Goulding, Sonia Radu, Juliana Arenas, Sarah Becker, Layana Al-Halbouni, Jordan Alter, Nancy Byatt, Wanda Phipatanakul, Milagros C Rosal, Stephenie C Lemon, Lynn B Gerald, Lori Pbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.07.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although school-supervised inhaled corticosteroid administration has potential to improve asthma morbidity, there has yet to be an evaluation of the pediatric practice as a setting to identify children with asthma and connect them to school-supervised asthma therapy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Conduct a pragmatic pilot trial of Asthma Link, a model that connects children with asthma seen in pediatric practice to supervised asthma therapy in the school setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four pediatric practices were pair-matched and randomized to (1) Asthma Link plus an asthma educational workbook or (2) Enhanced Usual Care, the same workbook alone. We recruited children 6 to 17 years old with poorly controlled asthma, prescribed a daily inhaled corticosteroid. Parent-child dyads completed surveys at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Primary outcomes: </strong>recruitment/retention of pediatric practices and parent-child dyads and intervention fidelity.</p><p><strong>Secondary outcomes: </strong>asthma symptoms, medication adherence, emergency room visits, hospital admissions, oral steroid use, missed schooldays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four pediatric practices and 66 parent-child dyads were recruited (average child age 9 y, 44% female, 65% Hispanic, 23% Black, 62% low income). All (4 of 4) practices were retained throughout the study and retention of parent-child dyads was 95%, 91%, and 89% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. All (31 of 31) Asthma Link families brought their child's preventive inhaler into school; children received school health staff-supervised therapy on more than 95% of schooldays over 12 months. Children in the Asthma Link group had greater improvement in Asthma Control Test scores, longer time to first asthma exacerbation, less oral steroid use, and better medication adherence compared with the Enhanced Usual Care group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Extending the reach of pediatric practices to facilitate the delivery of daily asthma prevention medication at school was feasible and improved pediatric asthma morbidity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380124/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2025.07.022\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2025.07.022","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Pilot Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial of School-Supervised Therapy to Improve Pediatric Asthma Control.
Background: Although school-supervised inhaled corticosteroid administration has potential to improve asthma morbidity, there has yet to be an evaluation of the pediatric practice as a setting to identify children with asthma and connect them to school-supervised asthma therapy.
Objective: Conduct a pragmatic pilot trial of Asthma Link, a model that connects children with asthma seen in pediatric practice to supervised asthma therapy in the school setting.
Methods: Four pediatric practices were pair-matched and randomized to (1) Asthma Link plus an asthma educational workbook or (2) Enhanced Usual Care, the same workbook alone. We recruited children 6 to 17 years old with poorly controlled asthma, prescribed a daily inhaled corticosteroid. Parent-child dyads completed surveys at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months.
Primary outcomes: recruitment/retention of pediatric practices and parent-child dyads and intervention fidelity.
Results: Four pediatric practices and 66 parent-child dyads were recruited (average child age 9 y, 44% female, 65% Hispanic, 23% Black, 62% low income). All (4 of 4) practices were retained throughout the study and retention of parent-child dyads was 95%, 91%, and 89% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. All (31 of 31) Asthma Link families brought their child's preventive inhaler into school; children received school health staff-supervised therapy on more than 95% of schooldays over 12 months. Children in the Asthma Link group had greater improvement in Asthma Control Test scores, longer time to first asthma exacerbation, less oral steroid use, and better medication adherence compared with the Enhanced Usual Care group.
Conclusions: Extending the reach of pediatric practices to facilitate the delivery of daily asthma prevention medication at school was feasible and improved pediatric asthma morbidity.
期刊介绍:
JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases.
This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders.
The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.