蒙特利尔认知评估的预后效用。

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Oscar R Kronenberger, Alyssa N Kaser, Vishal J Thakkar, Laura H Lacritz, Jeff Schaffert
{"title":"蒙特利尔认知评估的预后效用。","authors":"Oscar R Kronenberger, Alyssa N Kaser, Vishal J Thakkar, Laura H Lacritz, Jeff Schaffert","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2539990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a widely applied cognitive screening instrument, with a supplemental Memory Index Score (MIS) which has been suggested to predict conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's Clinical Syndrome (ACS). This study compared the prognostic utility of the MIS to other MoCA metrics in predicting conversion to ACS or other dementias (OD). We analyzed National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center data from 2900 participants aged 50 years or older, diagnosed with MCI at baseline, with at least one follow-up visit. Multinomial logistic regression models assessed whether baseline MoCA Total Score (TS) or MIS predicted final diagnoses, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves examined the clinical utility of baseline MoCA TS, MIS, Free Recall Score (FRS) and TS+MIS for identifying ACS converters at 1-, 3-, and 5-year follow-ups. Over an average follow-up of 4.65 years, 26.5% converted to ACS and 7.4% to OD. Higher baseline TS was associated with lower odds of conversion to ACS (OR = 0.82) and OD (OR = 0.86), while higher MIS was associated with lower odds of ACS (OR = 0.82) but not OD (OR = 0.97). For identifying ACS, ROC area under the curve ranges showed modest advantage for FRS (0.70-0.73), MIS (0.71-0.74), and TS+MIS (0.70-0.74) over the TS (0.63-0.70). MoCA memory subscores were the strongest baseline indicator of later ACS conversion, but no cut-off score displayed acceptable sensitivity and specificity. Future research may explore if MoCA memory subscores display greater prognostic utility in combination with other ACS features.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic utility of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Oscar R Kronenberger, Alyssa N Kaser, Vishal J Thakkar, Laura H Lacritz, Jeff Schaffert\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2025.2539990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a widely applied cognitive screening instrument, with a supplemental Memory Index Score (MIS) which has been suggested to predict conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's Clinical Syndrome (ACS). This study compared the prognostic utility of the MIS to other MoCA metrics in predicting conversion to ACS or other dementias (OD). We analyzed National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center data from 2900 participants aged 50 years or older, diagnosed with MCI at baseline, with at least one follow-up visit. Multinomial logistic regression models assessed whether baseline MoCA Total Score (TS) or MIS predicted final diagnoses, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves examined the clinical utility of baseline MoCA TS, MIS, Free Recall Score (FRS) and TS+MIS for identifying ACS converters at 1-, 3-, and 5-year follow-ups. Over an average follow-up of 4.65 years, 26.5% converted to ACS and 7.4% to OD. Higher baseline TS was associated with lower odds of conversion to ACS (OR = 0.82) and OD (OR = 0.86), while higher MIS was associated with lower odds of ACS (OR = 0.82) but not OD (OR = 0.97). For identifying ACS, ROC area under the curve ranges showed modest advantage for FRS (0.70-0.73), MIS (0.71-0.74), and TS+MIS (0.70-0.74) over the TS (0.63-0.70). MoCA memory subscores were the strongest baseline indicator of later ACS conversion, but no cut-off score displayed acceptable sensitivity and specificity. Future research may explore if MoCA memory subscores display greater prognostic utility in combination with other ACS features.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2539990\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2539990","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)是一种广泛应用的认知筛查工具,其补充的记忆指数评分(MIS)已被建议用于预测轻度认知障碍(MCI)向阿尔茨海默氏临床综合征(ACS)的转化。本研究比较了MIS与其他MoCA指标在预测转化为ACS或其他痴呆(OD)方面的预后效用。我们分析了国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心2900名年龄在50岁或以上的参与者的数据,这些参与者在基线时被诊断为轻度认知障碍,并至少进行了一次随访。多项逻辑回归模型评估基线MoCA总分(TS)或MIS是否预测最终诊断,受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线检验基线MoCA TS、MIS、自由回忆评分(FRS)和TS+MIS在1年、3年和5年随访中识别ACS转换者的临床应用。在平均4.65年的随访中,26.5%转化为ACS, 7.4%转化为OD。较高的基线TS与较低的ACS (OR = 0.82)和OD (OR = 0.86)相关,而较高的MIS与较低的ACS (OR = 0.82)相关,但与OD无关(OR = 0.97)。对于ACS的识别,曲线下的ROC面积FRS(0.70-0.73)、MIS(0.71-0.74)和TS+MIS(0.70-0.74)较TS(0.63-0.70)有一定优势。MoCA记忆亚评分是晚期ACS转换的最强基线指标,但没有一个截止评分显示出可接受的敏感性和特异性。未来的研究可能会探索MoCA记忆评分是否与其他ACS特征一起显示出更大的预后效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic utility of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a widely applied cognitive screening instrument, with a supplemental Memory Index Score (MIS) which has been suggested to predict conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's Clinical Syndrome (ACS). This study compared the prognostic utility of the MIS to other MoCA metrics in predicting conversion to ACS or other dementias (OD). We analyzed National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center data from 2900 participants aged 50 years or older, diagnosed with MCI at baseline, with at least one follow-up visit. Multinomial logistic regression models assessed whether baseline MoCA Total Score (TS) or MIS predicted final diagnoses, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves examined the clinical utility of baseline MoCA TS, MIS, Free Recall Score (FRS) and TS+MIS for identifying ACS converters at 1-, 3-, and 5-year follow-ups. Over an average follow-up of 4.65 years, 26.5% converted to ACS and 7.4% to OD. Higher baseline TS was associated with lower odds of conversion to ACS (OR = 0.82) and OD (OR = 0.86), while higher MIS was associated with lower odds of ACS (OR = 0.82) but not OD (OR = 0.97). For identifying ACS, ROC area under the curve ranges showed modest advantage for FRS (0.70-0.73), MIS (0.71-0.74), and TS+MIS (0.70-0.74) over the TS (0.63-0.70). MoCA memory subscores were the strongest baseline indicator of later ACS conversion, but no cut-off score displayed acceptable sensitivity and specificity. Future research may explore if MoCA memory subscores display greater prognostic utility in combination with other ACS features.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信