Joshua D Hoddinott, Molly J Henry, Jessica A Grahn
{"title":"经验驱动的可预测性不影响神经对节拍的卷入。","authors":"Joshua D Hoddinott, Molly J Henry, Jessica A Grahn","doi":"10.1162/jocn.a.95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humans spontaneously synchronize movements to a perceived underlying pulse, or beat, in music. Beat perception may be indexed by the synchronization of neural oscillations to the beat, marked by increases in EEG amplitude at the beat frequency [Nozaradan, S., Peretz, I., Missal, M., & Mouraux, A. Tagging the neuronal entrainment to beat and meter. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 10234-10240, 2011]. Indeed, neural synchronization to the beat appears stronger for strong-beat than non-beat rhythms [Tal, I., Large, E. W., Rabinovitch, E., Wei, Y., Schroeder, C. E., Poeppel, D., et al. Neural entrainment to the beat: The \"missing-pulse\" phenomenon. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37, 6331-6341, 2017] and may underlie the generation of an internal representation of beat. However, because we are exposed disproportionately to strong-beat rhythms (e.g., most Western music) in the environment, comparisons of neural responses to strong-beat and non-beat rhythms may be confounded by relative differences in familiarity. Here, we dissociated beat-related and familiarity-related neural responses by comparing EEG amplitudes during the perception of strong-beat and non-beat rhythms that were either novel or made familiar through training. First, we recorded EEG from participants while they listened to a set of strong-beat, weak-beat, and non-beat rhythms. Then, they were trained on half of the rhythms over four behavioral sessions by listening to and tapping along with them, such that half of the rhythms were familiar by the end of training. Finally, EEG responses to the full rhythm set (half now familiar, half still unfamiliar) were recorded posttraining. Results show no effect of training on EEG amplitude at beat or stimulus-related frequencies and little evidence of familiarity-driven changes in EEG amplitude for weak- and non-beat rhythms. This suggests that oscillatory entrainment to the beat is not driven by familiarity and therefore likely reflects beat processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":51081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experience-driven Predictability Does Not Influence Neural Entrainment to the Beat.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua D Hoddinott, Molly J Henry, Jessica A Grahn\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/jocn.a.95\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Humans spontaneously synchronize movements to a perceived underlying pulse, or beat, in music. Beat perception may be indexed by the synchronization of neural oscillations to the beat, marked by increases in EEG amplitude at the beat frequency [Nozaradan, S., Peretz, I., Missal, M., & Mouraux, A. Tagging the neuronal entrainment to beat and meter. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 10234-10240, 2011]. Indeed, neural synchronization to the beat appears stronger for strong-beat than non-beat rhythms [Tal, I., Large, E. W., Rabinovitch, E., Wei, Y., Schroeder, C. E., Poeppel, D., et al. Neural entrainment to the beat: The \\\"missing-pulse\\\" phenomenon. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37, 6331-6341, 2017] and may underlie the generation of an internal representation of beat. However, because we are exposed disproportionately to strong-beat rhythms (e.g., most Western music) in the environment, comparisons of neural responses to strong-beat and non-beat rhythms may be confounded by relative differences in familiarity. Here, we dissociated beat-related and familiarity-related neural responses by comparing EEG amplitudes during the perception of strong-beat and non-beat rhythms that were either novel or made familiar through training. First, we recorded EEG from participants while they listened to a set of strong-beat, weak-beat, and non-beat rhythms. Then, they were trained on half of the rhythms over four behavioral sessions by listening to and tapping along with them, such that half of the rhythms were familiar by the end of training. Finally, EEG responses to the full rhythm set (half now familiar, half still unfamiliar) were recorded posttraining. Results show no effect of training on EEG amplitude at beat or stimulus-related frequencies and little evidence of familiarity-driven changes in EEG amplitude for weak- and non-beat rhythms. This suggests that oscillatory entrainment to the beat is not driven by familiarity and therefore likely reflects beat processing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.a.95\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.a.95","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
人类会自发地将动作与音乐中感知到的潜在脉搏或节拍同步。节拍感知可以通过神经振荡与节拍的同步来索引,其标志是在节拍频率下脑电图振幅的增加[Nozaradan, S., Peretz, I., Missal, M., & Mouraux, A.标记神经元的节拍和节拍。神经科学学报,31 (1),2011 [j]。事实上,对于强节拍的神经同步似乎比非节拍节奏更强[Tal, I., Large, E. W., Rabinovitch, E., Wei, Y., Schroeder, C. E., Poeppel, D.,等]。神经对节拍的干扰:“脉搏缺失”现象。神经科学学报,37(6):631 - 631,2017]。然而,由于我们在环境中过多地接触到强拍节奏(例如,大多数西方音乐),比较神经对强拍和非强拍节奏的反应可能会因熟悉程度的相对差异而混淆。在这里,我们通过比较在感知强节拍和非节拍节奏时的脑电图振幅来分离与节拍相关和熟悉相关的神经反应,这些节奏要么是新的,要么是通过训练熟悉的。首先,我们记录了参与者在听一组强拍、弱拍和无拍节奏时的脑电图。然后,在四次行为训练中,他们通过听和跟着打拍子来训练一半的节奏,这样在训练结束时,一半的节奏就熟悉了。最后,在训练后记录对完整节奏组(一半熟悉,一半仍然不熟悉)的脑电图反应。结果表明,训练对搏动或刺激相关频率的脑电图振幅没有影响,并且几乎没有证据表明熟悉性导致弱和非搏动节奏的脑电图振幅变化。这表明对节拍的振荡卷入不是由熟悉度驱动的,因此可能反映了节拍处理。
Experience-driven Predictability Does Not Influence Neural Entrainment to the Beat.
Humans spontaneously synchronize movements to a perceived underlying pulse, or beat, in music. Beat perception may be indexed by the synchronization of neural oscillations to the beat, marked by increases in EEG amplitude at the beat frequency [Nozaradan, S., Peretz, I., Missal, M., & Mouraux, A. Tagging the neuronal entrainment to beat and meter. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 10234-10240, 2011]. Indeed, neural synchronization to the beat appears stronger for strong-beat than non-beat rhythms [Tal, I., Large, E. W., Rabinovitch, E., Wei, Y., Schroeder, C. E., Poeppel, D., et al. Neural entrainment to the beat: The "missing-pulse" phenomenon. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37, 6331-6341, 2017] and may underlie the generation of an internal representation of beat. However, because we are exposed disproportionately to strong-beat rhythms (e.g., most Western music) in the environment, comparisons of neural responses to strong-beat and non-beat rhythms may be confounded by relative differences in familiarity. Here, we dissociated beat-related and familiarity-related neural responses by comparing EEG amplitudes during the perception of strong-beat and non-beat rhythms that were either novel or made familiar through training. First, we recorded EEG from participants while they listened to a set of strong-beat, weak-beat, and non-beat rhythms. Then, they were trained on half of the rhythms over four behavioral sessions by listening to and tapping along with them, such that half of the rhythms were familiar by the end of training. Finally, EEG responses to the full rhythm set (half now familiar, half still unfamiliar) were recorded posttraining. Results show no effect of training on EEG amplitude at beat or stimulus-related frequencies and little evidence of familiarity-driven changes in EEG amplitude for weak- and non-beat rhythms. This suggests that oscillatory entrainment to the beat is not driven by familiarity and therefore likely reflects beat processing.