非体弱、体弱和体弱老年人运动行为改变的独特机会和动机目标。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Laura E Finch, Sylvia C Brown, Corliss Taylor, Benjamin Mendez, Samantha M Sawicki, Alan Gonzolez, M Lucia Madariaga, Daniel S Rubin, Nabiel A Mir, Lauren J Gleason, Margaret K Danilovich, David E Conroy, Megan J Huisingh-Scheetz
{"title":"非体弱、体弱和体弱老年人运动行为改变的独特机会和动机目标。","authors":"Laura E Finch, Sylvia C Brown, Corliss Taylor, Benjamin Mendez, Samantha M Sawicki, Alan Gonzolez, M Lucia Madariaga, Daniel S Rubin, Nabiel A Mir, Lauren J Gleason, Margaret K Danilovich, David E Conroy, Megan J Huisingh-Scheetz","doi":"10.1123/japa.2024-0196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Exercise is the most effective frailty mitigation intervention studied to date, yet frail older adults may face unique hurdles to exercise behavior change.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to compare perceived opportunities and motivation for physical activity among subgroups with varying physical capability to inform frailty intervention development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed cross-sectional survey data from n = 101 community-dwelling, older adults (n = 30 nonfrail, n = 59 prefrail, n = 12 frail; 93% African-American). Measures were organized by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior change framework. The capability factor included the frailty phenotype (nonfrail, prefrail, or frail). \"Opportunity\" factors included: barrier and resource identification, local program awareness, the Exercise Barriers Subscale, and exercise preferences. \"Motivation\" factors, included the Self-Rated Abilities for Health Practices Exercise Subscale; perceived exercise need, benefits, and harms; the Outcome Expectations for Exercise Scale; and personal health goals. Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests identified between-group quantitative differences. Open-ended survey responses were evaluated qualitatively for themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Frail adults had worse Exercise Barriers Subscale scores (p = .005); reported more barriers and fewer resources; were less aware of local exercise facilities; and had a narrower scope of exercise preferences. Frail adults also had worse Self-Rated Abilities for Health Practices Exercise Subscale scores (p = .004); were more likely to indicate they needed exercise; perceived more psychological exercise benefits than physical; but had worse Outcome Expectations for Exercise Scale scores (p < .001). One-year health goal themes were similar among frailty groups, with the majority identifying functional goals. Conclusion and Significance/Implications: This study identified opportunity and motivation factors unique to frail adults that could inform behavior change discussions and interventions in frail adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":51073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unique Opportunity and Motivational Targets for Exercise Behavior Change Among Nonfrail, Prefrail, and Frail Older Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Laura E Finch, Sylvia C Brown, Corliss Taylor, Benjamin Mendez, Samantha M Sawicki, Alan Gonzolez, M Lucia Madariaga, Daniel S Rubin, Nabiel A Mir, Lauren J Gleason, Margaret K Danilovich, David E Conroy, Megan J Huisingh-Scheetz\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/japa.2024-0196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Exercise is the most effective frailty mitigation intervention studied to date, yet frail older adults may face unique hurdles to exercise behavior change.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to compare perceived opportunities and motivation for physical activity among subgroups with varying physical capability to inform frailty intervention development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed cross-sectional survey data from n = 101 community-dwelling, older adults (n = 30 nonfrail, n = 59 prefrail, n = 12 frail; 93% African-American). Measures were organized by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior change framework. The capability factor included the frailty phenotype (nonfrail, prefrail, or frail). \\\"Opportunity\\\" factors included: barrier and resource identification, local program awareness, the Exercise Barriers Subscale, and exercise preferences. \\\"Motivation\\\" factors, included the Self-Rated Abilities for Health Practices Exercise Subscale; perceived exercise need, benefits, and harms; the Outcome Expectations for Exercise Scale; and personal health goals. Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests identified between-group quantitative differences. Open-ended survey responses were evaluated qualitatively for themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Frail adults had worse Exercise Barriers Subscale scores (p = .005); reported more barriers and fewer resources; were less aware of local exercise facilities; and had a narrower scope of exercise preferences. Frail adults also had worse Self-Rated Abilities for Health Practices Exercise Subscale scores (p = .004); were more likely to indicate they needed exercise; perceived more psychological exercise benefits than physical; but had worse Outcome Expectations for Exercise Scale scores (p < .001). One-year health goal themes were similar among frailty groups, with the majority identifying functional goals. Conclusion and Significance/Implications: This study identified opportunity and motivation factors unique to frail adults that could inform behavior change discussions and interventions in frail adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2024-0196\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2024-0196","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:运动是迄今为止研究的最有效的虚弱缓解干预措施,然而虚弱的老年人在改变运动行为方面可能面临独特的障碍。目的:我们的目的是比较具有不同身体能力的亚组中感知到的体育活动机会和动机,为虚弱干预的发展提供信息。方法:我们分析了101名社区老年人的横断面调查数据(n = 30名非体弱者,n = 59名体弱者,n = 12名体弱者,93%是非裔美国人)。测量是由能力,机会,动机-行为改变框架组织的。能力因素包括虚弱表型(非虚弱、虚弱或虚弱)。“机会”因素包括:障碍和资源识别、当地项目意识、运动障碍子量表和运动偏好。“动机”因素包括健康实践运动量表自评能力;感知到的锻炼需求、益处和危害;运动结果预期量表;还有个人健康目标。Kruskal-Wallis检验和卡方检验确定了组间数量差异。对开放式调查的回答进行主题定性评估。结果:体弱成人的运动障碍亚量表得分较差(p = 0.005);报告障碍更多,资源更少;不太了解当地的健身设施;他们的运动偏好范围更窄。体弱多病的成年人在健康实践锻炼亚量表得分上的自评能力也较差(p = 0.004);更有可能表示自己需要锻炼;认为心理锻炼比身体锻炼更有益;但运动量表评分结果预期较差(p < 0.001)。一年健康目标主题在虚弱群体中相似,大多数确定功能目标。结论和意义/启示:本研究确定了体弱多病成年人特有的机会和动机因素,可以为体弱多病成年人的行为改变讨论和干预提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unique Opportunity and Motivational Targets for Exercise Behavior Change Among Nonfrail, Prefrail, and Frail Older Adults.

Introduction: Exercise is the most effective frailty mitigation intervention studied to date, yet frail older adults may face unique hurdles to exercise behavior change.

Objective: Our objective was to compare perceived opportunities and motivation for physical activity among subgroups with varying physical capability to inform frailty intervention development.

Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional survey data from n = 101 community-dwelling, older adults (n = 30 nonfrail, n = 59 prefrail, n = 12 frail; 93% African-American). Measures were organized by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior change framework. The capability factor included the frailty phenotype (nonfrail, prefrail, or frail). "Opportunity" factors included: barrier and resource identification, local program awareness, the Exercise Barriers Subscale, and exercise preferences. "Motivation" factors, included the Self-Rated Abilities for Health Practices Exercise Subscale; perceived exercise need, benefits, and harms; the Outcome Expectations for Exercise Scale; and personal health goals. Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests identified between-group quantitative differences. Open-ended survey responses were evaluated qualitatively for themes.

Results: Frail adults had worse Exercise Barriers Subscale scores (p = .005); reported more barriers and fewer resources; were less aware of local exercise facilities; and had a narrower scope of exercise preferences. Frail adults also had worse Self-Rated Abilities for Health Practices Exercise Subscale scores (p = .004); were more likely to indicate they needed exercise; perceived more psychological exercise benefits than physical; but had worse Outcome Expectations for Exercise Scale scores (p < .001). One-year health goal themes were similar among frailty groups, with the majority identifying functional goals. Conclusion and Significance/Implications: This study identified opportunity and motivation factors unique to frail adults that could inform behavior change discussions and interventions in frail adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging and Physical Activity (JAPA) is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes peer-reviewed original research reports, scholarly reviews, and professional-application articles on the relationship between physical activity and the aging process. The journal encourages the submission of articles that can contribute to an understanding of (a) the impact of physical activity on physiological, psychological, and social aspects of older adults and (b) the effect of advancing age or the aging process on physical activity among older adults. In addition to publishing research reports and reviews, JAPA publishes articles that examine the development, implementation, and evaluation of physical activity programs among older adults. Articles from the biological, behavioral, and social sciences, as well as from fields such as medicine, clinical psychology, physical and recreational therapy, health, physical education, and recreation, are appropriate for the journal. Studies using animal models do not fit within our mission statement and should be submitted elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信