二甲双胍联合或不联合胰岛素治疗妊娠期糖尿病的母婴结局。

IF 0.6 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Abhinav Kumar, J Muthukrishnan, Ankita Patel, Burle Chaitanya Kiran
{"title":"二甲双胍联合或不联合胰岛素治疗妊娠期糖尿病的母婴结局。","authors":"Abhinav Kumar, J Muthukrishnan, Ankita Patel, Burle Chaitanya Kiran","doi":"10.1007/s13224-025-02124-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is linked with a multitude of adverse perinatal outcomes. There is a want for standard guidelines regarding the usage of Metformin in GDM. We aimed to study the perinatal outcomes in women diagnosed with GDM treated primarily with Metformin with or without Insulin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled pilot study. with a total of 75 women, divided into three groups: GDM treated with Metformin with or without Insulin (Group M), GDM on Insulin alone (Group I), and healthy pregnant women as controls (Group H), with 25 subjects in each group. At delivery, fetal and maternal outcomes were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age in groups M, I and H were 27.4, 26.2, and 27.3 years respectively. The baseline mean HOMA-IR were 3.9 and 4.1 for Group M and Group I, respectively (<i>p</i>-0.560). The mean fetal birth weight was 2.95 ± 0.54 kg, 2.8 ± 0.41 kg, and 2.97 ± 0.65 kg in Groups M, H, and I, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.527). The mean newborn HOMA-IR in Groups M and I was 1.8 ± 0.4 and 1.7 ± 0.5, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.185). The adverse events in newborns were 20% (<i>n</i> = 5), 16% (<i>n</i> = 4) and 16% (<i>n</i> = 4) in Groups M, H, and I respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.403). The incidence of caesarean deliveries was 40% (<i>n</i> = 10), 48% (<i>n</i> = 12) and 24% (<i>n</i> = 6) in Groups M, H, and I respectively (<i>p</i>-0.253).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study revealed identical maternal and fetal outcomes in women treated with Metformin as the primary drug compared to conventional treatment with Insulin in GDM.</p>","PeriodicalId":51563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","volume":"75 4","pages":"304-310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12367571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Treated with Metformin with or Without Insulin.\",\"authors\":\"Abhinav Kumar, J Muthukrishnan, Ankita Patel, Burle Chaitanya Kiran\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13224-025-02124-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is linked with a multitude of adverse perinatal outcomes. There is a want for standard guidelines regarding the usage of Metformin in GDM. We aimed to study the perinatal outcomes in women diagnosed with GDM treated primarily with Metformin with or without Insulin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled pilot study. with a total of 75 women, divided into three groups: GDM treated with Metformin with or without Insulin (Group M), GDM on Insulin alone (Group I), and healthy pregnant women as controls (Group H), with 25 subjects in each group. At delivery, fetal and maternal outcomes were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age in groups M, I and H were 27.4, 26.2, and 27.3 years respectively. The baseline mean HOMA-IR were 3.9 and 4.1 for Group M and Group I, respectively (<i>p</i>-0.560). The mean fetal birth weight was 2.95 ± 0.54 kg, 2.8 ± 0.41 kg, and 2.97 ± 0.65 kg in Groups M, H, and I, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.527). The mean newborn HOMA-IR in Groups M and I was 1.8 ± 0.4 and 1.7 ± 0.5, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.185). The adverse events in newborns were 20% (<i>n</i> = 5), 16% (<i>n</i> = 4) and 16% (<i>n</i> = 4) in Groups M, H, and I respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.403). The incidence of caesarean deliveries was 40% (<i>n</i> = 10), 48% (<i>n</i> = 12) and 24% (<i>n</i> = 6) in Groups M, H, and I respectively (<i>p</i>-0.253).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study revealed identical maternal and fetal outcomes in women treated with Metformin as the primary drug compared to conventional treatment with Insulin in GDM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India\",\"volume\":\"75 4\",\"pages\":\"304-310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12367571/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-025-02124-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-025-02124-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)与许多不良的围产期结局有关。关于二甲双胍在GDM中的使用,需要一个标准的指南。我们的目的是研究诊断为GDM的妇女主要用二甲双胍加或不加胰岛素治疗的围产期结局。方法:采用随机对照先导研究。共75名妇女,分为三组:使用二甲双胍加或不加胰岛素治疗的GDM (M组)、单独使用胰岛素治疗的GDM (I组)和健康孕妇作为对照(H组),每组25名受试者。分娩时,记录胎儿和母亲的结局。结果:M、I、H组患者平均年龄分别为27.4岁、26.2岁、27.3岁。M组和I组的基线平均HOMA-IR分别为3.9和4.1 (p-0.560)。M组、H组和I组的平均出生体重分别为2.95±0.54 kg、2.8±0.41 kg和2.97±0.65 kg (p = 0.527)。M组和I组新生儿平均HOMA-IR分别为1.8±0.4和1.7±0.5 (p = 0.185)。M、H、I组新生儿不良事件发生率分别为20% (n = 5)、16% (n = 4)、16% (n = 4) (p = 0.403)。M组、H组和I组剖宫产发生率分别为40% (n = 10)、48% (n = 12)和24% (n = 6) (p = 0.253)。结论:该研究显示,与常规胰岛素治疗相比,以二甲双胍作为主要药物治疗的GDM妇女的母胎结局相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Treated with Metformin with or Without Insulin.

Background: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is linked with a multitude of adverse perinatal outcomes. There is a want for standard guidelines regarding the usage of Metformin in GDM. We aimed to study the perinatal outcomes in women diagnosed with GDM treated primarily with Metformin with or without Insulin.

Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled pilot study. with a total of 75 women, divided into three groups: GDM treated with Metformin with or without Insulin (Group M), GDM on Insulin alone (Group I), and healthy pregnant women as controls (Group H), with 25 subjects in each group. At delivery, fetal and maternal outcomes were documented.

Results: The mean age in groups M, I and H were 27.4, 26.2, and 27.3 years respectively. The baseline mean HOMA-IR were 3.9 and 4.1 for Group M and Group I, respectively (p-0.560). The mean fetal birth weight was 2.95 ± 0.54 kg, 2.8 ± 0.41 kg, and 2.97 ± 0.65 kg in Groups M, H, and I, respectively (p = 0.527). The mean newborn HOMA-IR in Groups M and I was 1.8 ± 0.4 and 1.7 ± 0.5, respectively (p = 0.185). The adverse events in newborns were 20% (n = 5), 16% (n = 4) and 16% (n = 4) in Groups M, H, and I respectively (p = 0.403). The incidence of caesarean deliveries was 40% (n = 10), 48% (n = 12) and 24% (n = 6) in Groups M, H, and I respectively (p-0.253).

Conclusion: The study revealed identical maternal and fetal outcomes in women treated with Metformin as the primary drug compared to conventional treatment with Insulin in GDM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (JOGI) is the official journal of the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies of India (FOGSI). This is a peer- reviewed journal and features articles pertaining to the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal is published six times a year on a bimonthly basis. Articles contributed by clinicians involved in patient care and research, and basic science researchers are considered. It publishes clinical and basic research of all aspects of obstetrics and gynecology, community obstetrics and family welfare and subspecialty subjects including gynecological endoscopy, infertility, oncology and ultrasonography, provided they have scientific merit and represent an important advance in knowledge. The journal believes in diversity and welcomes and encourages relevant contributions from world over. The types of articles published are: ·         Original Article·         Case Report ·         Instrumentation and Techniques ·         Short Commentary ·         Correspondence (Letter to the Editor) ·         Pictorial Essay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信