{"title":"赞比亚儿童发病率的分类水平:小面积估算法的应用。","authors":"Audrey M Kalindi, Sumonkanti Das","doi":"10.1186/s12963-025-00413-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High rates of child morbidity and developmental challenges among children under five remain critical challenges in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite Zambia's progress in reducing under-five morbidity, the rates remain high, with provincial-level disparities. These disparities are likely to be more pronounced at finer geographic levels, such as districts. However, demographic health surveys, designed for national and provincial estimates, lack sufficient data to produce reliable district-level morbidity statistics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigates the geospatial distribution of child morbidity prevalence across disaggregated administrative units using small area estimation (SAE) methods.</p><p><strong>Data and methods: </strong>Data from the 2018 Zambia Demographic and Health Survey and the 2010 Zambian Census were used to derive direct estimates of child morbidity for small domains cross-classified by district and age group. A hierarchical Bayesian SAE model was developed to account for spatial and unobserved heterogeneity at provincial and district levels, including cross-classifications by age group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Model-based estimates show lower standard errors compared to the direct estimates and significant differences in morbidity levels within and between districts and provinces. Under-five morbidity prevalence remains high at 25%, with the highest rates in Luapula (approximately 40%) and Western provinces (around 35%) and among children aged 11-23 months (nearly 40%). SAE estimates at the district and district-by-age levels were numerically consistent when aggregated to higher levels, such as province or child age group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data-driven detailed level estimates provide critical insights into the spatial distribution of child morbidity, supporting targeted interventions and informed policymaking at disaggregated levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":51476,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Metrics","volume":"23 1","pages":"51"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392499/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disaggregated level child morbidity in Zambia: an application of small area estimation method.\",\"authors\":\"Audrey M Kalindi, Sumonkanti Das\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12963-025-00413-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High rates of child morbidity and developmental challenges among children under five remain critical challenges in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite Zambia's progress in reducing under-five morbidity, the rates remain high, with provincial-level disparities. These disparities are likely to be more pronounced at finer geographic levels, such as districts. However, demographic health surveys, designed for national and provincial estimates, lack sufficient data to produce reliable district-level morbidity statistics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigates the geospatial distribution of child morbidity prevalence across disaggregated administrative units using small area estimation (SAE) methods.</p><p><strong>Data and methods: </strong>Data from the 2018 Zambia Demographic and Health Survey and the 2010 Zambian Census were used to derive direct estimates of child morbidity for small domains cross-classified by district and age group. A hierarchical Bayesian SAE model was developed to account for spatial and unobserved heterogeneity at provincial and district levels, including cross-classifications by age group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Model-based estimates show lower standard errors compared to the direct estimates and significant differences in morbidity levels within and between districts and provinces. Under-five morbidity prevalence remains high at 25%, with the highest rates in Luapula (approximately 40%) and Western provinces (around 35%) and among children aged 11-23 months (nearly 40%). SAE estimates at the district and district-by-age levels were numerically consistent when aggregated to higher levels, such as province or child age group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data-driven detailed level estimates provide critical insights into the spatial distribution of child morbidity, supporting targeted interventions and informed policymaking at disaggregated levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Population Health Metrics\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392499/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Population Health Metrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-025-00413-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Metrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-025-00413-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disaggregated level child morbidity in Zambia: an application of small area estimation method.
Background: High rates of child morbidity and developmental challenges among children under five remain critical challenges in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite Zambia's progress in reducing under-five morbidity, the rates remain high, with provincial-level disparities. These disparities are likely to be more pronounced at finer geographic levels, such as districts. However, demographic health surveys, designed for national and provincial estimates, lack sufficient data to produce reliable district-level morbidity statistics.
Objective: This study investigates the geospatial distribution of child morbidity prevalence across disaggregated administrative units using small area estimation (SAE) methods.
Data and methods: Data from the 2018 Zambia Demographic and Health Survey and the 2010 Zambian Census were used to derive direct estimates of child morbidity for small domains cross-classified by district and age group. A hierarchical Bayesian SAE model was developed to account for spatial and unobserved heterogeneity at provincial and district levels, including cross-classifications by age group.
Results: Model-based estimates show lower standard errors compared to the direct estimates and significant differences in morbidity levels within and between districts and provinces. Under-five morbidity prevalence remains high at 25%, with the highest rates in Luapula (approximately 40%) and Western provinces (around 35%) and among children aged 11-23 months (nearly 40%). SAE estimates at the district and district-by-age levels were numerically consistent when aggregated to higher levels, such as province or child age group.
Conclusion: These data-driven detailed level estimates provide critical insights into the spatial distribution of child morbidity, supporting targeted interventions and informed policymaking at disaggregated levels.
期刊介绍:
Population Health Metrics aims to advance the science of population health assessment, and welcomes papers relating to concepts, methods, ethics, applications, and summary measures of population health. The journal provides a unique platform for population health researchers to share their findings with the global community. We seek research that addresses the communication of population health measures and policy implications to stakeholders; this includes papers related to burden estimation and risk assessment, and research addressing population health across the full range of development. Population Health Metrics covers a broad range of topics encompassing health state measurement and valuation, summary measures of population health, descriptive epidemiology at the population level, burden of disease and injury analysis, disease and risk factor modeling for populations, and comparative assessment of risks to health at the population level. The journal is also interested in how to use and communicate indicators of population health to reduce disease burden, and the approaches for translating from indicators of population health to health-advancing actions. As a cross-cutting topic of importance, we are particularly interested in inequalities in population health and their measurement.