Mianli Xiao, Zailing Xing, Douglas D Schocken, Janice C Zgibor, Amy C Alman
{"title":"长期服用阿司匹林与心力衰竭发生率:一项患者水平的汇总分析研究。","authors":"Mianli Xiao, Zailing Xing, Douglas D Schocken, Janice C Zgibor, Amy C Alman","doi":"10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.08.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effect of chronic aspirin use on the development of heart failure remains uncertain, and no prior observational study has evaluated it as a time-dependent exposure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from four prospective cohort studies involving 26,941 individuals free of cardiovascular disease but at risk for heart failure. The baseline mean age was 60.7 years; 55.6% were female and 65.4% were White. Time-dependent information on aspirin use and heart failure risk factors was systematically collected, and participants were longitudinally followed for incident heart failure. Using the parametric g-formula, we estimated the effect of two hypothetical interventions-consistent aspirin use and never using aspirin-on heart failure incidence. Covariates included baseline age, sex, race, smoking, alcohol consumption, study-related factors, and time-dependent variables such as body mass index, systolic blood pressure, low-density lipids, triglycerides, blood glucose, creatinine, and medication use (anti-hypertensive, anti-diabetic, lipid-lowering, and anticoagulant).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median follow-up of 14.8 years (IQR: 8.5-22.5), 5,899 heart failure cases occurred. At year 32, as estimated by the model and compared with the natural course (no intervention), continuous aspirin use increased heart failure risk by 7% (risk ratio [RR] 1.07, 95% CI 1.05-1.08), while never using aspirin decreased risk by 6% (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.95). These effects persisted in subgroup analyses by sex and by baseline age (<60/≥60 years).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-term aspirin use increased the risk of heart failure in individuals free of cardiovascular disease, as estimated through a hypothetical intervention using the g-formula.</p>","PeriodicalId":50807,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term aspirin use and heart failure incidence: A patient-level pooled analysis study.\",\"authors\":\"Mianli Xiao, Zailing Xing, Douglas D Schocken, Janice C Zgibor, Amy C Alman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.08.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effect of chronic aspirin use on the development of heart failure remains uncertain, and no prior observational study has evaluated it as a time-dependent exposure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from four prospective cohort studies involving 26,941 individuals free of cardiovascular disease but at risk for heart failure. The baseline mean age was 60.7 years; 55.6% were female and 65.4% were White. Time-dependent information on aspirin use and heart failure risk factors was systematically collected, and participants were longitudinally followed for incident heart failure. Using the parametric g-formula, we estimated the effect of two hypothetical interventions-consistent aspirin use and never using aspirin-on heart failure incidence. Covariates included baseline age, sex, race, smoking, alcohol consumption, study-related factors, and time-dependent variables such as body mass index, systolic blood pressure, low-density lipids, triglycerides, blood glucose, creatinine, and medication use (anti-hypertensive, anti-diabetic, lipid-lowering, and anticoagulant).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median follow-up of 14.8 years (IQR: 8.5-22.5), 5,899 heart failure cases occurred. At year 32, as estimated by the model and compared with the natural course (no intervention), continuous aspirin use increased heart failure risk by 7% (risk ratio [RR] 1.07, 95% CI 1.05-1.08), while never using aspirin decreased risk by 6% (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.95). These effects persisted in subgroup analyses by sex and by baseline age (<60/≥60 years).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-term aspirin use increased the risk of heart failure in individuals free of cardiovascular disease, as estimated through a hypothetical intervention using the g-formula.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.08.025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.08.025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:长期服用阿司匹林对心力衰竭发展的影响仍不确定,之前没有观察性研究将其评估为时间依赖性暴露。方法:我们分析了四项前瞻性队列研究的数据,涉及26,941名无心血管疾病但有心力衰竭风险的个体。基线平均年龄为60.7岁;55.6%为女性,65.4%为白人。系统地收集了阿司匹林使用和心力衰竭危险因素的时间依赖性信息,并对参与者进行了心力衰竭事件的纵向随访。使用参数g公式,我们估计了两种假设干预措施——持续使用阿司匹林和从不使用阿司匹林——对心力衰竭发生率的影响。协变量包括基线年龄、性别、种族、吸烟、饮酒、研究相关因素和时间相关变量,如体重指数、收缩压、低密度脂、甘油三酯、血糖、肌酐和药物使用(抗高血压、抗糖尿病、降脂和抗凝)。结果:中位随访14.8年(IQR: 8.5-22.5),发生了5899例心力衰竭。在第32年,根据模型估计,与自然病程(无干预)相比,持续使用阿司匹林使心力衰竭风险增加7%(风险比[RR] 1.07, 95% CI 1.05-1.08),而从不使用阿司匹林使风险降低6% (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.95)。这些影响在按性别和基线年龄进行的亚组分析中持续存在(结论:通过使用g公式的假设干预估计,长期使用阿司匹林会增加无心血管疾病个体的心力衰竭风险。
Long-term aspirin use and heart failure incidence: A patient-level pooled analysis study.
Background: The effect of chronic aspirin use on the development of heart failure remains uncertain, and no prior observational study has evaluated it as a time-dependent exposure.
Methods: We analyzed data from four prospective cohort studies involving 26,941 individuals free of cardiovascular disease but at risk for heart failure. The baseline mean age was 60.7 years; 55.6% were female and 65.4% were White. Time-dependent information on aspirin use and heart failure risk factors was systematically collected, and participants were longitudinally followed for incident heart failure. Using the parametric g-formula, we estimated the effect of two hypothetical interventions-consistent aspirin use and never using aspirin-on heart failure incidence. Covariates included baseline age, sex, race, smoking, alcohol consumption, study-related factors, and time-dependent variables such as body mass index, systolic blood pressure, low-density lipids, triglycerides, blood glucose, creatinine, and medication use (anti-hypertensive, anti-diabetic, lipid-lowering, and anticoagulant).
Results: Over a median follow-up of 14.8 years (IQR: 8.5-22.5), 5,899 heart failure cases occurred. At year 32, as estimated by the model and compared with the natural course (no intervention), continuous aspirin use increased heart failure risk by 7% (risk ratio [RR] 1.07, 95% CI 1.05-1.08), while never using aspirin decreased risk by 6% (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.95). These effects persisted in subgroup analyses by sex and by baseline age (<60/≥60 years).
Conclusion: Long-term aspirin use increased the risk of heart failure in individuals free of cardiovascular disease, as estimated through a hypothetical intervention using the g-formula.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Medicine - "The Green Journal" - publishes original clinical research of interest to physicians in internal medicine, both in academia and community-based practice. AJM is the official journal of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, a prestigious group comprising internal medicine department chairs at more than 125 medical schools across the U.S. Each issue carries useful reviews as well as seminal articles of immediate interest to the practicing physician, including peer-reviewed, original scientific studies that have direct clinical significance and position papers on health care issues, medical education, and public policy.