整合持续专业发展、持续教育与品质改善:个案研究与实务启示。

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Sharisse M Arnold Rehring, John F Steiner, Brian Wong, Joanne Goldman
{"title":"整合持续专业发展、持续教育与品质改善:个案研究与实务启示。","authors":"Sharisse M Arnold Rehring, John F Steiner, Brian Wong, Joanne Goldman","doi":"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Continuing professional development (CPD) and quality improvement (QI) are both dedicated to improving clinical practice and health outcomes. Although leaders in both disciplines have long recommended closer alignment, few case studies have demonstrated how such alignment can be developed and sustained within a health care system. Kaiser Permanente Colorado is an integrated health care delivery system in the United States that has worked toward coordination of CPD and QI for >20 years. Alignment of departmental reporting structures, interdisciplinary teams of educators, incorporation of quality concerns into continuing education (CE) activities, coordination of CE activities with implementation of decision support tools, and reliance on evidence-based educational practices have all contributed to a unique organizational culture of education. Published research has shown that their approach can lead to sustainable practice change. Many elements of this approach are potentially applicable to other systems, including consistent use of interprofessional teams, recognizing the organizational context, development of a theory of change to address education and quality gaps, coordination of CE and quality interventions, and using educational and clinical data to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions. Because these changes have occurred within an evolving environment of real-world practice, the effectiveness of specific components or the interactions between them are difficult to establish. Nonetheless, the Kaiser Permanente Colorado model provides one example of coordination between CPD and QI experts to achieve their shared goal of improving clinician practice, patient care, and system performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating Continuing Professional Development, Continuing Education, and Quality Improvement: A Case Study and Implications for Practice.\",\"authors\":\"Sharisse M Arnold Rehring, John F Steiner, Brian Wong, Joanne Goldman\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Continuing professional development (CPD) and quality improvement (QI) are both dedicated to improving clinical practice and health outcomes. Although leaders in both disciplines have long recommended closer alignment, few case studies have demonstrated how such alignment can be developed and sustained within a health care system. Kaiser Permanente Colorado is an integrated health care delivery system in the United States that has worked toward coordination of CPD and QI for >20 years. Alignment of departmental reporting structures, interdisciplinary teams of educators, incorporation of quality concerns into continuing education (CE) activities, coordination of CE activities with implementation of decision support tools, and reliance on evidence-based educational practices have all contributed to a unique organizational culture of education. Published research has shown that their approach can lead to sustainable practice change. Many elements of this approach are potentially applicable to other systems, including consistent use of interprofessional teams, recognizing the organizational context, development of a theory of change to address education and quality gaps, coordination of CE and quality interventions, and using educational and clinical data to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions. Because these changes have occurred within an evolving environment of real-world practice, the effectiveness of specific components or the interactions between them are difficult to establish. Nonetheless, the Kaiser Permanente Colorado model provides one example of coordination between CPD and QI experts to achieve their shared goal of improving clinician practice, patient care, and system performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000618\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000618","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:持续专业发展(CPD)和质量改进(QI)都致力于改善临床实践和健康结果。尽管这两个学科的领导者长期以来都建议更密切的协调,但很少有案例研究表明如何在卫生保健系统内发展和维持这种协调。Kaiser Permanente Colorado是美国的一个综合医疗服务系统,致力于CPD和QI的协调已有20多年。部门报告结构的一致性,跨学科的教育工作者团队,将质量问题纳入继续教育活动,协调教育活动与决策支持工具的实施,以及对循证教育实践的依赖,都有助于形成独特的教育组织文化。已发表的研究表明,他们的方法可以导致可持续的实践变化。该方法的许多要素可能适用于其他系统,包括一致使用跨专业团队,认识组织环境,发展变革理论以解决教育和质量差距,协调CE和质量干预措施,以及使用教育和临床数据来评估这些干预措施的有效性。由于这些变化发生在不断发展的现实世界实践环境中,因此很难确定特定组件的有效性或它们之间的相互作用。尽管如此,Kaiser Permanente Colorado的模式提供了CPD和QI专家之间协调的一个例子,以实现他们改善临床医生实践、患者护理和系统性能的共同目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating Continuing Professional Development, Continuing Education, and Quality Improvement: A Case Study and Implications for Practice.

Abstract: Continuing professional development (CPD) and quality improvement (QI) are both dedicated to improving clinical practice and health outcomes. Although leaders in both disciplines have long recommended closer alignment, few case studies have demonstrated how such alignment can be developed and sustained within a health care system. Kaiser Permanente Colorado is an integrated health care delivery system in the United States that has worked toward coordination of CPD and QI for >20 years. Alignment of departmental reporting structures, interdisciplinary teams of educators, incorporation of quality concerns into continuing education (CE) activities, coordination of CE activities with implementation of decision support tools, and reliance on evidence-based educational practices have all contributed to a unique organizational culture of education. Published research has shown that their approach can lead to sustainable practice change. Many elements of this approach are potentially applicable to other systems, including consistent use of interprofessional teams, recognizing the organizational context, development of a theory of change to address education and quality gaps, coordination of CE and quality interventions, and using educational and clinical data to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions. Because these changes have occurred within an evolving environment of real-world practice, the effectiveness of specific components or the interactions between them are difficult to establish. Nonetheless, the Kaiser Permanente Colorado model provides one example of coordination between CPD and QI experts to achieve their shared goal of improving clinician practice, patient care, and system performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信