数字体育活动干预对社区老年人肌肉机械功能的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.5 1区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Carlo Della Valle, Charlotte Gatti, Alessio Bricca, Valentina Mancini, Orgesa Qipo, Nerijus Masiulis, Jon André Christensen, Mohammad Mosaferi Ziaaldini, Günay Yildizer, Soran Aminiaghdam, Paolo Caserotti
{"title":"数字体育活动干预对社区老年人肌肉机械功能的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Carlo Della Valle, Charlotte Gatti, Alessio Bricca, Valentina Mancini, Orgesa Qipo, Nerijus Masiulis, Jon André Christensen, Mohammad Mosaferi Ziaaldini, Günay Yildizer, Soran Aminiaghdam, Paolo Caserotti","doi":"10.1186/s11556-025-00380-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the effect of digital exercise interventions on muscle mechanical function in community-dwelling older adults aged 60 and above.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science until end of March 2024. The Cochrane RoB2.0 tool and GRADE were employed for quality assessment. We performed meta-analysis using random-effects model and sub-group and meta-regression analyses to investigate the robustness of the findings. GRADE was used to assess the overall certainty of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty RCTs, comprising 1697 participants with a mean age of 71.27 years, were included in the data analysis. The meta-analysis revealed a significant overall effect of technology-based physical activity intervention on muscle mechanical function (Hedge's g = 0.27, p = < 0.001). In the sub-analysis, 18 studies focused on interactive interventions on handgrip strength (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.38) and leg strength (SMD 0.56, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.93). The overall certainty of the evidence was deemed low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital interventions focusing on physical activity interventions have generally shown small but significant improvements in older adults. Interactive and semi-interactive interventions were effective, while passive ones were not.</p>","PeriodicalId":50477,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity","volume":"22 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of digital physical activity interventions on muscle mechanical function in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Carlo Della Valle, Charlotte Gatti, Alessio Bricca, Valentina Mancini, Orgesa Qipo, Nerijus Masiulis, Jon André Christensen, Mohammad Mosaferi Ziaaldini, Günay Yildizer, Soran Aminiaghdam, Paolo Caserotti\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s11556-025-00380-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the effect of digital exercise interventions on muscle mechanical function in community-dwelling older adults aged 60 and above.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science until end of March 2024. The Cochrane RoB2.0 tool and GRADE were employed for quality assessment. We performed meta-analysis using random-effects model and sub-group and meta-regression analyses to investigate the robustness of the findings. GRADE was used to assess the overall certainty of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty RCTs, comprising 1697 participants with a mean age of 71.27 years, were included in the data analysis. The meta-analysis revealed a significant overall effect of technology-based physical activity intervention on muscle mechanical function (Hedge's g = 0.27, p = < 0.001). In the sub-analysis, 18 studies focused on interactive interventions on handgrip strength (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.38) and leg strength (SMD 0.56, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.93). The overall certainty of the evidence was deemed low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital interventions focusing on physical activity interventions have generally shown small but significant improvements in older adults. Interactive and semi-interactive interventions were effective, while passive ones were not.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403258/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-025-00380-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-025-00380-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨数字运动干预对60岁及以上社区老年人肌肉机械功能的影响。方法:对2024年3月底前从PubMed、EMBASE (Ovid)、Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials和Web of Science检索的随机对照试验(RCTs)进行系统评价。采用Cochrane RoB2.0工具和GRADE进行质量评价。我们使用随机效应模型和亚组和元回归分析进行meta分析,以调查研究结果的稳健性。GRADE用于评估证据的总体确定性。结果:数据分析纳入30项随机对照试验,包括1697名参与者,平均年龄71.27岁。荟萃分析揭示了基于技术的体育活动干预对肌肉机械功能的显着总体影响(Hedge's g = 0.27, p =结论:以体育活动干预为重点的数字干预通常在老年人中显示出微小但显著的改善。互动和半互动干预有效,而被动干预无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of digital physical activity interventions on muscle mechanical function in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aim: To investigate the effect of digital exercise interventions on muscle mechanical function in community-dwelling older adults aged 60 and above.

Methods: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science until end of March 2024. The Cochrane RoB2.0 tool and GRADE were employed for quality assessment. We performed meta-analysis using random-effects model and sub-group and meta-regression analyses to investigate the robustness of the findings. GRADE was used to assess the overall certainty of the evidence.

Results: Thirty RCTs, comprising 1697 participants with a mean age of 71.27 years, were included in the data analysis. The meta-analysis revealed a significant overall effect of technology-based physical activity intervention on muscle mechanical function (Hedge's g = 0.27, p = < 0.001). In the sub-analysis, 18 studies focused on interactive interventions on handgrip strength (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.38) and leg strength (SMD 0.56, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.93). The overall certainty of the evidence was deemed low.

Conclusion: Digital interventions focusing on physical activity interventions have generally shown small but significant improvements in older adults. Interactive and semi-interactive interventions were effective, while passive ones were not.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.60%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Review of Aging and Physical Activity (EURAPA) disseminates research on the biomedical and behavioural aspects of physical activity and aging. The main issues addressed by EURAPA are the impact of physical activity or exercise on cognitive, physical, and psycho-social functioning of older people, physical activity patterns in advanced age, and the relationship between physical activity and health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信