{"title":"减轻美国PFAS污染:评估2018年至2022年加州立法对饮用水质量的影响。","authors":"Sameer D Bagga, Iris J N Parshley, Lindsay Tallon","doi":"10.1057/s41271-025-00594-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates the impact of California's specific per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) legislation on perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) contamination levels in public drinking water. We conducted a comparative statistical analysis using data collected by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rules (UCMRs), specifically UCMR 3 and UCMR 5. To assess PFOA and PFOS levels in active public water systems during the pre-legislation period (2017) and the post-legislation period (2023) we applied Levene's test to assess differences in variances, followed by unpaired and Welch's t-tests to compare mean PFAS concentrations between the two time periods. We detected a significant decline in both PFOA and PFOS levels post-legislation, suggesting that robust state-level regulatory measures can effectively reduce PFAS contamination. Findings highlight the potential for California's comprehensive approach to serve as a model for national policy to mitigate PFAS exposure and protect public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":50070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mitigating PFAS contamination in the United States: assessing the impact of California's legislation from 2018 to 2022 on drinking water quality.\",\"authors\":\"Sameer D Bagga, Iris J N Parshley, Lindsay Tallon\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41271-025-00594-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluates the impact of California's specific per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) legislation on perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) contamination levels in public drinking water. We conducted a comparative statistical analysis using data collected by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rules (UCMRs), specifically UCMR 3 and UCMR 5. To assess PFOA and PFOS levels in active public water systems during the pre-legislation period (2017) and the post-legislation period (2023) we applied Levene's test to assess differences in variances, followed by unpaired and Welch's t-tests to compare mean PFAS concentrations between the two time periods. We detected a significant decline in both PFOA and PFOS levels post-legislation, suggesting that robust state-level regulatory measures can effectively reduce PFAS contamination. Findings highlight the potential for California's comprehensive approach to serve as a model for national policy to mitigate PFAS exposure and protect public health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-025-00594-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-025-00594-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mitigating PFAS contamination in the United States: assessing the impact of California's legislation from 2018 to 2022 on drinking water quality.
This study evaluates the impact of California's specific per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) legislation on perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) contamination levels in public drinking water. We conducted a comparative statistical analysis using data collected by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rules (UCMRs), specifically UCMR 3 and UCMR 5. To assess PFOA and PFOS levels in active public water systems during the pre-legislation period (2017) and the post-legislation period (2023) we applied Levene's test to assess differences in variances, followed by unpaired and Welch's t-tests to compare mean PFAS concentrations between the two time periods. We detected a significant decline in both PFOA and PFOS levels post-legislation, suggesting that robust state-level regulatory measures can effectively reduce PFAS contamination. Findings highlight the potential for California's comprehensive approach to serve as a model for national policy to mitigate PFAS exposure and protect public health.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Public Health Policy (JPHP) will continue its 35 year tradition: an accessible source of scholarly articles on the epidemiologic and social foundations of public health policy, rigorously edited, and progressive.
JPHP aims to create a more inclusive public health policy dialogue, within nations and among them. It broadens public health policy debates beyond the ''health system'' to examine all forces and environments that impinge on the health of populations. It provides an exciting platform for airing controversy and framing policy debates - honing policies to solve new problems and unresolved old ones.
JPHP welcomes unsolicited original scientific and policy contributions on all public health topics. New authors are particularly encouraged to enter debates about how to improve the health of populations and reduce health disparities.