Evaluation of radiation doses and the impact of operator variability on radiation exposure in fluoroscopy-guided procedures: insights from Sri Lanka.

Fluoroscopy-guided diagnostic and therapeutic procedures often result in higher radiation exposure compared to other imaging techniques. This study evaluated radiation doses and the effect of operator variability in such procedures, aiming to enhance patient safety by minimizing exposure through the establishment of National Diagnostic Reference Levels (NDRLs). Data on air kerma area product (P_KA), cumulative air kerma (Ka,r), and fluoroscopy time were retrospectively collected from 11 hospitals, totaling 6670 cases. NDRLs were determined as the third quartile of the median dose distributions for five commonly performed procedures, while tentative Diagnostic Reference Levels were proposed for others using the 75th percentile of available data. The analysis also assessed the influence of operators on radiation doses. The proposed NDRLs for coronary angiogram (CA), lower extremity angioplasty (single leg), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI-single stent), CA + PCI (single stent), and barium swallow procedures were 16, 54, 26, 58, and 20 Gy·cm²for theP_KAdose estimator, respectively. Notable variability in radiation doses was observed across operators, with cardiologist having a more significant impact, particularly in complex procedures like PCI. However, the complexity of the procedures was not considered, making the assessment of operator variability challenging given the fact that more complex cases may inherently require higher radiation exposure. The findings highlight the importance of establishing and adhering to DRLs, as the absence of such benchmarks may contribute to elevated radiation doses, particularly in complex fluoroscopy guided interventions like transarterial chemoembolization and cerebrovascular embolization. By addressing the observed variability in radiation doses, particularly those influenced by operator practices, NDRLs can guide the refinement of procedural protocols, promote consistency across institutions, and ultimately enhance patient safety by minimizing unnecessary radiation exposure.