比较反复静脉注射氯胺酮和电休克治疗对难治性抑郁症患者的认知效果:ELEKT-D试验的二次分析

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Kristina T Kumpf, Samuel T Wilkinson, Bo Hu, Ruoying Chen, Kamini Krishnan, Shinjon Chakrabarti, Taeho Greg Rhee, Tiffany Grezmak, Sanjay J Mathew, Gerard Sanacora, James W Murrough, Fernando S Goes, Katherine A Collins, Brian S Barnett, Amit Anand
{"title":"比较反复静脉注射氯胺酮和电休克治疗对难治性抑郁症患者的认知效果:ELEKT-D试验的二次分析","authors":"Kristina T Kumpf, Samuel T Wilkinson, Bo Hu, Ruoying Chen, Kamini Krishnan, Shinjon Chakrabarti, Taeho Greg Rhee, Tiffany Grezmak, Sanjay J Mathew, Gerard Sanacora, James W Murrough, Fernando S Goes, Katherine A Collins, Brian S Barnett, Amit Anand","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25m15781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has potent antidepressant effects yet can lead to neurocognitive side effects. Ketamine is a rapid-acting antidepressant, which may be an alternative to ECT. Few have directly compared the cognitive effects of ECT and ketamine treatment.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> We compared cognitive effects of intravenous ketamine and ECT in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), collected through a multisite, randomized trial conducted between April 2017 and November 2022 (the ELEKT-D study). Participants received 6 IV ketamine treatments or 9 ECT sessions. Cognitive functioning was assessed through 4 validated cognitive tasks at pre- and posttreatment visits. The Squire Memory Complaint Questionnaire (SMCQ) and Global Self-Evaluation of Memory (GSE-My) were used to measure changes in memory functioning. Responders (those who achieved ≥50% reduction in depressive symptoms) were evaluated again at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up visits.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> In the intent-to-treat sample (N = 365), ECT recipients performed significantly worse than ketamine recipients on all cognitive tasks at end of treatment (<i>P</i> < .001), with no significant differences in task performance associated with response to either treatment. Among responders, we observed no significant group differences at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up. Analyses of subjective memory questionnaires were mixed. SMCQ scores improved for both groups with ketamine recipients reporting greater functional gains; ketamine-treated patients reported improvements in GSE-My scores while ECT-treated patients reported a decline in GSE-My scores. Within-group analyses in the ketamine group found improvements in executive functioning and cognitive flexibility. This survived adjustments for changes in depression, suggesting partial independence of cognitive and mood effects.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Patients treated with ketamine demonstrated superior cognitive functioning compared with those treated with ECT following a 3-week treatment course, with no differences between treatments observed among responders in follow-up. Findings support the short-term superiority of ketamine on cognitive functioning and the long-term cognitive safety of both treatments for TRD.</p><p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03113968.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"86 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Cognitive Effects of Repeated Intravenous Ketamine and Electroconvulsive Therapy in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Secondary Analysis of the ELEKT-D Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Kristina T Kumpf, Samuel T Wilkinson, Bo Hu, Ruoying Chen, Kamini Krishnan, Shinjon Chakrabarti, Taeho Greg Rhee, Tiffany Grezmak, Sanjay J Mathew, Gerard Sanacora, James W Murrough, Fernando S Goes, Katherine A Collins, Brian S Barnett, Amit Anand\",\"doi\":\"10.4088/JCP.25m15781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has potent antidepressant effects yet can lead to neurocognitive side effects. Ketamine is a rapid-acting antidepressant, which may be an alternative to ECT. Few have directly compared the cognitive effects of ECT and ketamine treatment.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> We compared cognitive effects of intravenous ketamine and ECT in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), collected through a multisite, randomized trial conducted between April 2017 and November 2022 (the ELEKT-D study). Participants received 6 IV ketamine treatments or 9 ECT sessions. Cognitive functioning was assessed through 4 validated cognitive tasks at pre- and posttreatment visits. The Squire Memory Complaint Questionnaire (SMCQ) and Global Self-Evaluation of Memory (GSE-My) were used to measure changes in memory functioning. Responders (those who achieved ≥50% reduction in depressive symptoms) were evaluated again at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up visits.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> In the intent-to-treat sample (N = 365), ECT recipients performed significantly worse than ketamine recipients on all cognitive tasks at end of treatment (<i>P</i> < .001), with no significant differences in task performance associated with response to either treatment. Among responders, we observed no significant group differences at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up. Analyses of subjective memory questionnaires were mixed. SMCQ scores improved for both groups with ketamine recipients reporting greater functional gains; ketamine-treated patients reported improvements in GSE-My scores while ECT-treated patients reported a decline in GSE-My scores. Within-group analyses in the ketamine group found improvements in executive functioning and cognitive flexibility. This survived adjustments for changes in depression, suggesting partial independence of cognitive and mood effects.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Patients treated with ketamine demonstrated superior cognitive functioning compared with those treated with ECT following a 3-week treatment course, with no differences between treatments observed among responders in follow-up. Findings support the short-term superiority of ketamine on cognitive functioning and the long-term cognitive safety of both treatments for TRD.</p><p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03113968.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"86 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.25m15781\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.25m15781","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:电痉挛疗法(ECT)具有有效的抗抑郁作用,但也可能导致神经认知方面的副作用。氯胺酮是一种速效抗抑郁药,可能是电痉挛疗法的替代品。很少有人直接比较电痉挛疗法和氯胺酮治疗的认知效果。方法:我们比较静脉注射氯胺酮和ECT对难治性抑郁症(TRD)患者的认知效果,这些患者是通过2017年4月至2022年11月进行的一项多地点随机试验(ELEKT-D研究)收集的。参与者接受6次静脉氯胺酮治疗或9次ECT治疗。在治疗前和治疗后的访问中,通过4个验证的认知任务来评估认知功能。采用Squire记忆抱怨问卷(SMCQ)和全局记忆自我评价问卷(GSE-My)测量记忆功能的变化。在1个月、3个月和6个月的随访中再次评估应答者(抑郁症状减轻≥50%的患者)。结果:在意向治疗样本(N = 365)中,ECT接受者在治疗结束时的所有认知任务上的表现明显差于氯胺酮接受者(P < 0.001),两种治疗的反应在任务表现上没有显著差异。在应答者中,我们在1个月、3个月和6个月的随访中没有观察到显著的组间差异。主观记忆问卷的分析是混合的。两组的SMCQ评分均有改善,氯胺酮接受者报告更大的功能获益;氯胺酮治疗的患者报告GSE-My评分改善,而ect治疗的患者报告GSE-My评分下降。在组内分析中,氯胺酮组的执行功能和认知灵活性有所改善。这在抑郁症变化的调整中幸存下来,表明认知和情绪影响的部分独立性。结论:在3周的治疗过程中,氯胺酮治疗的患者比ECT治疗的患者表现出更好的认知功能,在随访中观察到应答者之间的治疗没有差异。研究结果支持氯胺酮对认知功能的短期优势和两种治疗方法对TRD的长期认知安全性。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03113968。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing the Cognitive Effects of Repeated Intravenous Ketamine and Electroconvulsive Therapy in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Secondary Analysis of the ELEKT-D Trial.

Objective: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has potent antidepressant effects yet can lead to neurocognitive side effects. Ketamine is a rapid-acting antidepressant, which may be an alternative to ECT. Few have directly compared the cognitive effects of ECT and ketamine treatment.

Methods: We compared cognitive effects of intravenous ketamine and ECT in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), collected through a multisite, randomized trial conducted between April 2017 and November 2022 (the ELEKT-D study). Participants received 6 IV ketamine treatments or 9 ECT sessions. Cognitive functioning was assessed through 4 validated cognitive tasks at pre- and posttreatment visits. The Squire Memory Complaint Questionnaire (SMCQ) and Global Self-Evaluation of Memory (GSE-My) were used to measure changes in memory functioning. Responders (those who achieved ≥50% reduction in depressive symptoms) were evaluated again at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up visits.

Results: In the intent-to-treat sample (N = 365), ECT recipients performed significantly worse than ketamine recipients on all cognitive tasks at end of treatment (P < .001), with no significant differences in task performance associated with response to either treatment. Among responders, we observed no significant group differences at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up. Analyses of subjective memory questionnaires were mixed. SMCQ scores improved for both groups with ketamine recipients reporting greater functional gains; ketamine-treated patients reported improvements in GSE-My scores while ECT-treated patients reported a decline in GSE-My scores. Within-group analyses in the ketamine group found improvements in executive functioning and cognitive flexibility. This survived adjustments for changes in depression, suggesting partial independence of cognitive and mood effects.

Conclusions: Patients treated with ketamine demonstrated superior cognitive functioning compared with those treated with ECT following a 3-week treatment course, with no differences between treatments observed among responders in follow-up. Findings support the short-term superiority of ketamine on cognitive functioning and the long-term cognitive safety of both treatments for TRD.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03113968.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 75 years, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry has been a leading source of peer-reviewed articles offering the latest information on mental health topics to psychiatrists and other medical professionals.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry is the leading psychiatric resource for clinical information and covers disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, addiction, posttraumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder while exploring the newest advances in diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信