治疗难治性精神分裂症患者氯氮平优于第二代抗精神病药物:疑点。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Chittaranjan Andrade
{"title":"治疗难治性精神分裂症患者氯氮平优于第二代抗精神病药物:疑点。","authors":"Chittaranjan Andrade","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25f16038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Schizophrenia is a major mental illness with a median lifetime prevalence, across studies, of 0.5%. Across definitions of treatment resistance, about 37% of schizophrenia patients do not respond to treatment, and about 24% are treatment resistant from the first-episode, itself. Treatment resistance is addressed by trialing different antipsychotics and with antipsychotic augmentation strategies; what augmenting agent is used depends on what the target symptoms are. A landmark study in 1988 demonstrated the efficacy of clozapine in treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Confirmatory studies and meta-analyses followed, establishing clozapine as the drug of choice for TRS in schizophrenia treatment guidelines across the world. Between 2016 and 2025, 2 network meta analyses (NMAs) and 1 individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) examined randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of clozapine vs other antipsychotics in TRS. The NMAs found that clozapine was superior to first-generation antipsychotics; however, clozapine did not head rankings for overall symptoms, positive symptoms, or negative symptoms, and, in pairwise analyses, there was little difference between clozapine and olanzapine and clozapine and risperidone for overall symptoms, positive symptoms, and negative symptoms. The IPD-MA found that clozapine was no better than comparator second-generation antipsychotics, considered singly or together, for overall symptoms, positive symptoms, and negative symptoms, in the short term, intermediate term, and long term. These findings fly in the face of clinical experience and treatment guideline recommendations. Among possible explanations, notable was that clozapine was significantly superior to comparator drugs when disregarding RCTs sponsored by the manufacturer of olanzapine. Clozapine is associated with many inconveniencing, distressing, and serious adverse effects that may be rare or common. Given the findings that olanzapine and risperidone may be as good as clozapine in TRS, it may be worth trialing these drugs before clozapine in patients with TRS. These and related issues, including nuances, are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"86 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Superiority of Clozapine Over Second-Generation Antipsychotics in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: Room for Doubt.\",\"authors\":\"Chittaranjan Andrade\",\"doi\":\"10.4088/JCP.25f16038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Schizophrenia is a major mental illness with a median lifetime prevalence, across studies, of 0.5%. Across definitions of treatment resistance, about 37% of schizophrenia patients do not respond to treatment, and about 24% are treatment resistant from the first-episode, itself. Treatment resistance is addressed by trialing different antipsychotics and with antipsychotic augmentation strategies; what augmenting agent is used depends on what the target symptoms are. A landmark study in 1988 demonstrated the efficacy of clozapine in treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Confirmatory studies and meta-analyses followed, establishing clozapine as the drug of choice for TRS in schizophrenia treatment guidelines across the world. Between 2016 and 2025, 2 network meta analyses (NMAs) and 1 individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) examined randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of clozapine vs other antipsychotics in TRS. The NMAs found that clozapine was superior to first-generation antipsychotics; however, clozapine did not head rankings for overall symptoms, positive symptoms, or negative symptoms, and, in pairwise analyses, there was little difference between clozapine and olanzapine and clozapine and risperidone for overall symptoms, positive symptoms, and negative symptoms. The IPD-MA found that clozapine was no better than comparator second-generation antipsychotics, considered singly or together, for overall symptoms, positive symptoms, and negative symptoms, in the short term, intermediate term, and long term. These findings fly in the face of clinical experience and treatment guideline recommendations. Among possible explanations, notable was that clozapine was significantly superior to comparator drugs when disregarding RCTs sponsored by the manufacturer of olanzapine. Clozapine is associated with many inconveniencing, distressing, and serious adverse effects that may be rare or common. Given the findings that olanzapine and risperidone may be as good as clozapine in TRS, it may be worth trialing these drugs before clozapine in patients with TRS. These and related issues, including nuances, are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"86 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.25f16038\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.25f16038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精神分裂症是一种主要的精神疾病,在所有研究中,其终生患病率中位数为0.5%。根据治疗耐药的定义,约37%的精神分裂症患者对治疗没有反应,约24%的患者从首次发作起就有治疗耐药。通过试验不同的抗精神病药物和抗精神病药物增强策略来解决治疗耐药性;使用何种增强剂取决于目标症状是什么。1988年的一项具有里程碑意义的研究证实了氯氮平治疗难治性精神分裂症(TRS)的有效性。随后进行了验证性研究和荟萃分析,确定氯氮平是世界各地精神分裂症治疗指南中TRS的首选药物。2016年至2025年间,2项网络荟萃分析(nma)和1项个体参与者数据荟萃分析(IPD-MA)检查了氯氮平与其他抗精神病药物在TRS中的随机对照试验(rct)。nma发现氯氮平优于第一代抗精神病药物;然而,氯氮平在总体症状、阳性症状或阴性症状的排名中并不领先,并且,在两两分析中,氯氮平与奥氮平以及氯氮平与利培酮在总体症状、阳性症状和阴性症状方面几乎没有差异。IPD-MA发现,在短期、中期和长期的总体症状、阳性症状和阴性症状方面,氯氮平并不比比较药二代抗精神病药物更好,无论是单独使用还是联合使用。这些发现完全违背了临床经验和治疗指南的建议。在可能的解释中,值得注意的是,当忽略由奥氮平制造商赞助的随机对照试验时,氯氮平明显优于比较药物。氯氮平与许多不便、痛苦和严重的不良反应有关,这些不良反应可能罕见或常见。考虑到奥氮平和利培酮在TRS中的效果可能与氯氮平一样好,在TRS患者使用氯氮平之前试用这些药物是值得的。讨论了这些和相关的问题,包括细微差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Superiority of Clozapine Over Second-Generation Antipsychotics in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: Room for Doubt.

Schizophrenia is a major mental illness with a median lifetime prevalence, across studies, of 0.5%. Across definitions of treatment resistance, about 37% of schizophrenia patients do not respond to treatment, and about 24% are treatment resistant from the first-episode, itself. Treatment resistance is addressed by trialing different antipsychotics and with antipsychotic augmentation strategies; what augmenting agent is used depends on what the target symptoms are. A landmark study in 1988 demonstrated the efficacy of clozapine in treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Confirmatory studies and meta-analyses followed, establishing clozapine as the drug of choice for TRS in schizophrenia treatment guidelines across the world. Between 2016 and 2025, 2 network meta analyses (NMAs) and 1 individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) examined randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of clozapine vs other antipsychotics in TRS. The NMAs found that clozapine was superior to first-generation antipsychotics; however, clozapine did not head rankings for overall symptoms, positive symptoms, or negative symptoms, and, in pairwise analyses, there was little difference between clozapine and olanzapine and clozapine and risperidone for overall symptoms, positive symptoms, and negative symptoms. The IPD-MA found that clozapine was no better than comparator second-generation antipsychotics, considered singly or together, for overall symptoms, positive symptoms, and negative symptoms, in the short term, intermediate term, and long term. These findings fly in the face of clinical experience and treatment guideline recommendations. Among possible explanations, notable was that clozapine was significantly superior to comparator drugs when disregarding RCTs sponsored by the manufacturer of olanzapine. Clozapine is associated with many inconveniencing, distressing, and serious adverse effects that may be rare or common. Given the findings that olanzapine and risperidone may be as good as clozapine in TRS, it may be worth trialing these drugs before clozapine in patients with TRS. These and related issues, including nuances, are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 75 years, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry has been a leading source of peer-reviewed articles offering the latest information on mental health topics to psychiatrists and other medical professionals.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry is the leading psychiatric resource for clinical information and covers disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, addiction, posttraumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder while exploring the newest advances in diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信