婴儿喂养选择的判断与婴儿喂养信息的意见。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Kimberly N Doughty, Lliana Joe, Sarah N Taylor
{"title":"婴儿喂养选择的判断与婴儿喂养信息的意见。","authors":"Kimberly N Doughty, Lliana Joe, Sarah N Taylor","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2025.07.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess mothers' perceptions of judgment for infant feeding practices and opinions of the messages Breast is Best and Fed is Best, and investigate variation in these outcomes by sociodemographic characteristics and infant feeding practices.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey design.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>US women with children aged 1-4 years (n = 926) recruited from a national online opinion panel.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Perceptions of judgment for breastfeeding and formula feeding by health care providers and community members; opinions of infant feeding messages.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>We used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of each outcome measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 40% of participants who used infant formula felt judged for formula feeding by both health care providers and their community. Of those who ever breastfed, 17.0% and 26.3% felt judged for breastfeeding by providers and their community, respectively. More than half (56.1%) of respondents had a very positive opinion of Fed is Best, as compared with 33.3% for Breast is Best. Sociodemographic characteristics were significantly associated with perceived judgment and/or attitudes toward infant feeding messages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Perceptions of judgment were common. Opinions of Breast is Best were more negative than opinions of Fed is Best, suggesting a need for more effective and nuanced breastfeeding promotion messages.</p>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judgment for Infant Feeding Choices and Opinions of Infant Feeding Messages.\",\"authors\":\"Kimberly N Doughty, Lliana Joe, Sarah N Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneb.2025.07.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess mothers' perceptions of judgment for infant feeding practices and opinions of the messages Breast is Best and Fed is Best, and investigate variation in these outcomes by sociodemographic characteristics and infant feeding practices.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey design.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>US women with children aged 1-4 years (n = 926) recruited from a national online opinion panel.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Perceptions of judgment for breastfeeding and formula feeding by health care providers and community members; opinions of infant feeding messages.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>We used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of each outcome measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 40% of participants who used infant formula felt judged for formula feeding by both health care providers and their community. Of those who ever breastfed, 17.0% and 26.3% felt judged for breastfeeding by providers and their community, respectively. More than half (56.1%) of respondents had a very positive opinion of Fed is Best, as compared with 33.3% for Breast is Best. Sociodemographic characteristics were significantly associated with perceived judgment and/or attitudes toward infant feeding messages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Perceptions of judgment were common. Opinions of Breast is Best were more negative than opinions of Fed is Best, suggesting a need for more effective and nuanced breastfeeding promotion messages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2025.07.014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2025.07.014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估母亲对婴儿喂养方式的判断和对“母乳是最好的”和“母乳喂养是最好的”信息的看法,并调查社会人口统计学特征和婴儿喂养方式对这些结果的影响。设计:横断面调查设计。参与者:有1-4岁孩子的美国妇女(n = 926)从全国在线意见小组中招募。主要结果测量:卫生保健提供者和社区成员对母乳喂养和配方奶喂养判断的看法;对婴儿喂养信息的意见。分析:我们使用多变量逻辑回归来确定每个结果测量的预测因子。结果:大约40%的使用婴儿配方奶粉的参与者感到被卫生保健提供者和他们的社区评判配方喂养。在曾经母乳喂养的人中,分别有17.0%和26.3%的人感到母乳喂养受到提供者及其社区的评判。超过一半(56.1%)的受访者对“Fed是最好的”持非常积极的看法,而对“Breast是最好的”持非常积极看法的受访者为33.3%。社会人口学特征与感知判断和/或对婴儿喂养信息的态度显著相关。结论和启示:判断知觉是常见的。“母乳是最好的”的观点比“美联储是最好的”的观点更消极,这表明需要更有效、更细致的母乳喂养宣传信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Judgment for Infant Feeding Choices and Opinions of Infant Feeding Messages.

Objective: To assess mothers' perceptions of judgment for infant feeding practices and opinions of the messages Breast is Best and Fed is Best, and investigate variation in these outcomes by sociodemographic characteristics and infant feeding practices.

Design: Cross-sectional survey design.

Participants: US women with children aged 1-4 years (n = 926) recruited from a national online opinion panel.

Main outcome measures: Perceptions of judgment for breastfeeding and formula feeding by health care providers and community members; opinions of infant feeding messages.

Analysis: We used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of each outcome measure.

Results: Approximately 40% of participants who used infant formula felt judged for formula feeding by both health care providers and their community. Of those who ever breastfed, 17.0% and 26.3% felt judged for breastfeeding by providers and their community, respectively. More than half (56.1%) of respondents had a very positive opinion of Fed is Best, as compared with 33.3% for Breast is Best. Sociodemographic characteristics were significantly associated with perceived judgment and/or attitudes toward infant feeding messages.

Conclusions and implications: Perceptions of judgment were common. Opinions of Breast is Best were more negative than opinions of Fed is Best, suggesting a need for more effective and nuanced breastfeeding promotion messages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas. The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信