{"title":"食物不安全大学生群体间污名化类型的差异","authors":"Rachel L Vollmer, Teresa Drake, Sokonie Reed","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2025.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Compare stigma constructs across demographic and student characteristics among food-insecure college students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study recruited college students with food insecurity to complete an online survey to report food security status, food insecurity-related stigma (personalized stigma, disclosure concerns, negative self-image, and public attitudes), and demographic characteristics. One-way analysis of variance and independent t tests were used to assess differences in stigma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven students with food insecurity completed the online survey. First-generation students with very low food security reported higher disclosure concerns than students with marginal/food security (F[2,73] = 3.16, P = 0.05) and non-first-generation students (t[74] = -1.99, P = 0.05), respectively. White students reported less personalized stigma than non-White students (t[72] = 2.01, P = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>This research identifies groups of students who may have higher disclosure stigma and past stigmatizing experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Types of Stigma Between Demographic Groups Among College Students With Food Insecurity.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel L Vollmer, Teresa Drake, Sokonie Reed\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneb.2025.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Compare stigma constructs across demographic and student characteristics among food-insecure college students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study recruited college students with food insecurity to complete an online survey to report food security status, food insecurity-related stigma (personalized stigma, disclosure concerns, negative self-image, and public attitudes), and demographic characteristics. One-way analysis of variance and independent t tests were used to assess differences in stigma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven students with food insecurity completed the online survey. First-generation students with very low food security reported higher disclosure concerns than students with marginal/food security (F[2,73] = 3.16, P = 0.05) and non-first-generation students (t[74] = -1.99, P = 0.05), respectively. White students reported less personalized stigma than non-White students (t[72] = 2.01, P = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>This research identifies groups of students who may have higher disclosure stigma and past stigmatizing experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2025.08.004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2025.08.004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的：比较食物不安全大学生的人口学特征和学生特征的污名结构。方法：本横断面研究招募有食物不安全的大学生完成一项在线调查，报告食物安全状况、食物不安全相关的污名（个性化污名、披露担忧、负面自我形象和公众态度）和人口统计学特征。采用单因素方差分析和独立t检验评估病耻感的差异。结果：77名食品不安全学生完成了在线调查。食品安全水平非常低的第一代学生比边缘/食品安全的学生（F[2,73] = 3.16, P = 0.05）和非第一代学生（t[74] = -1.99, P = 0.05）对信息披露的担忧程度更高。白人学生比非白人学生报告更少的个性化耻辱（t[72] = 2.01, P = 0.04）。结论和启示：本研究确定了可能有较高披露污名和过去污名经历的学生群体。
Differences in Types of Stigma Between Demographic Groups Among College Students With Food Insecurity.
Objective: Compare stigma constructs across demographic and student characteristics among food-insecure college students.
Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited college students with food insecurity to complete an online survey to report food security status, food insecurity-related stigma (personalized stigma, disclosure concerns, negative self-image, and public attitudes), and demographic characteristics. One-way analysis of variance and independent t tests were used to assess differences in stigma.
Results: Seventy-seven students with food insecurity completed the online survey. First-generation students with very low food security reported higher disclosure concerns than students with marginal/food security (F[2,73] = 3.16, P = 0.05) and non-first-generation students (t[74] = -1.99, P = 0.05), respectively. White students reported less personalized stigma than non-White students (t[72] = 2.01, P = 0.04).
Conclusions and implications: This research identifies groups of students who may have higher disclosure stigma and past stigmatizing experiences.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas.
The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
