加拿大安大略省一家三级医院巨细胞动脉炎相关视力结果的评估

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Mats L Junek, Rahul Chanchlani, Amadeo R Rodriguez, Nader Khalidi, Amber O Molnar
{"title":"加拿大安大略省一家三级医院巨细胞动脉炎相关视力结果的评估","authors":"Mats L Junek, Rahul Chanchlani, Amadeo R Rodriguez, Nader Khalidi, Amber O Molnar","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There are limited data concerning outcomes in those with giant cell arteritis (GCA)-associated vision changes (GCAVCs). We estimated the association of intravenous (IV), compared to oral, glucocorticoids (GCs) with outcomes in GCAVCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary healthcare facility in Ontario, Canada. Individuals aged ≥ 50 years with an International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, diagnostic code for GCA associated with a healthcare visit between November 2017 to December 2023 were identified for inclusion. Diagnoses of GCA were verified as the final diagnosis of the treating clinician and were required to be supported by histologic, radiographic, and/or biochemical evidence of inflammatory vasculopathy. GCAVCs were identified by clinical assessments. Treatment exposures were defined as whether the individual was first exposed to IV or oral GCs. The primary outcome was reported visual improvement after treatment. We used logistic regression to estimate treatment effects, adjusting for demographic and disease factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 289 patients with GCA, 77 (26.6%) had GCAVCs. Of these, 70.1% of GCAVCs led to permanent vision loss, and visual recovery was seen in 16% of participants. We found no difference in outcomes for those first treated with IV vs oral GCs (adjusted odds ratios 0.43-1.72; 95% CI 0.02-123.68).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GCAVCs are common and frequently associated with permanent vision loss. Although the precision of our results was limited by sample size, we did not find evidence that receiving IV GCs before oral GCs was associated with visual improvement in GCAVCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Giant Cell Arteritis-Associated Visual Outcomes at a Tertiary Hospital in Ontario, Canada.\",\"authors\":\"Mats L Junek, Rahul Chanchlani, Amadeo R Rodriguez, Nader Khalidi, Amber O Molnar\",\"doi\":\"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There are limited data concerning outcomes in those with giant cell arteritis (GCA)-associated vision changes (GCAVCs). We estimated the association of intravenous (IV), compared to oral, glucocorticoids (GCs) with outcomes in GCAVCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary healthcare facility in Ontario, Canada. Individuals aged ≥ 50 years with an International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, diagnostic code for GCA associated with a healthcare visit between November 2017 to December 2023 were identified for inclusion. Diagnoses of GCA were verified as the final diagnosis of the treating clinician and were required to be supported by histologic, radiographic, and/or biochemical evidence of inflammatory vasculopathy. GCAVCs were identified by clinical assessments. Treatment exposures were defined as whether the individual was first exposed to IV or oral GCs. The primary outcome was reported visual improvement after treatment. We used logistic regression to estimate treatment effects, adjusting for demographic and disease factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 289 patients with GCA, 77 (26.6%) had GCAVCs. Of these, 70.1% of GCAVCs led to permanent vision loss, and visual recovery was seen in 16% of participants. We found no difference in outcomes for those first treated with IV vs oral GCs (adjusted odds ratios 0.43-1.72; 95% CI 0.02-123.68).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GCAVCs are common and frequently associated with permanent vision loss. Although the precision of our results was limited by sample size, we did not find evidence that receiving IV GCs before oral GCs was associated with visual improvement in GCAVCs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2025-0459\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2025-0459","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关于巨细胞动脉炎相关视力改变(GCA, GCAVCs)患者预后的数据有限。与口服相比,我们估计静脉注射糖皮质激素与GCAVCs预后的关系。方法:我们在加拿大安大略省的一家三级医疗机构进行了一项回顾性队列研究。在2017年11月至2023年12月期间进行过医疗保健访问,并具有国际疾病分类第10版(ICD-10) GCA诊断代码的50岁或以上的个体被确定为纳入。GCA的诊断被证实为治疗临床医生的最终诊断,需要有炎症性血管病变的组织学、影像学和/或生化证据的支持。通过临床评估确定GCAVCs。治疗暴露被定义为个体是否首次暴露于静脉注射或口服糖皮质激素。治疗后的主要结果为视力改善。我们使用逻辑回归来估计经人口统计学和疾病因素调整后的治疗效果。结果:289例GCA患者中,77例(26.6%)存在gcavc。70.1%的GCAVCs导致永久性视力丧失,16.0%的参与者出现视力恢复。我们发现首次静脉注射糖皮质激素与口服糖皮质激素治疗的结果无差异(校正优势比为0.43-1.72,95%可信区间为0.02-123.68)。结论:gcavc是常见的,且常与永久性视力丧失相关。虽然我们的结果的准确性受到样本量的限制,但我们没有发现静脉注射前口服糖皮质激素与GCAVCs的视力改善相关的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Giant Cell Arteritis-Associated Visual Outcomes at a Tertiary Hospital in Ontario, Canada.

Objective: There are limited data concerning outcomes in those with giant cell arteritis (GCA)-associated vision changes (GCAVCs). We estimated the association of intravenous (IV), compared to oral, glucocorticoids (GCs) with outcomes in GCAVCs.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary healthcare facility in Ontario, Canada. Individuals aged ≥ 50 years with an International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, diagnostic code for GCA associated with a healthcare visit between November 2017 to December 2023 were identified for inclusion. Diagnoses of GCA were verified as the final diagnosis of the treating clinician and were required to be supported by histologic, radiographic, and/or biochemical evidence of inflammatory vasculopathy. GCAVCs were identified by clinical assessments. Treatment exposures were defined as whether the individual was first exposed to IV or oral GCs. The primary outcome was reported visual improvement after treatment. We used logistic regression to estimate treatment effects, adjusting for demographic and disease factors.

Results: In 289 patients with GCA, 77 (26.6%) had GCAVCs. Of these, 70.1% of GCAVCs led to permanent vision loss, and visual recovery was seen in 16% of participants. We found no difference in outcomes for those first treated with IV vs oral GCs (adjusted odds ratios 0.43-1.72; 95% CI 0.02-123.68).

Conclusion: GCAVCs are common and frequently associated with permanent vision loss. Although the precision of our results was limited by sample size, we did not find evidence that receiving IV GCs before oral GCs was associated with visual improvement in GCAVCs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rheumatology
Journal of Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rheumatology is a monthly international serial edited by Earl D. Silverman. The Journal features research articles on clinical subjects from scientists working in rheumatology and related fields, as well as proceedings of meetings as supplements to regular issues. Highlights of our 41 years serving Rheumatology include: groundbreaking and provocative editorials such as "Inverting the Pyramid," renowned Pediatric Rheumatology, proceedings of OMERACT and the Canadian Rheumatology Association, Cochrane Musculoskeletal Reviews, and supplements on emerging therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信