Brian J Kinsman, Sara Smolinski-Zhao, Fran D Soljacic, Lingshan Liu, Matthew R Smith, Ariel L Mueller, Timothy T Houle, Katarina J Ruscic
{"title":"麻醉类型和血管收缩剂使用与结内淋巴管造影时间的关系:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Brian J Kinsman, Sara Smolinski-Zhao, Fran D Soljacic, Lingshan Liu, Matthew R Smith, Ariel L Mueller, Timothy T Houle, Katarina J Ruscic","doi":"10.1016/j.jvir.2025.08.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate whether anesthesia type (sedation vs general anesthesia [GA]) or α<sub>1</sub>-adrenergic agonist vasoconstrictor administration is associated with faster intralymphatic contrast agent transit during intranodal lymphangiography in an effort to identify modifiable nonprocedural factors that may reduce procedure duration.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study reviewed intranodal lymphangiography from 2 academic hospitals (2015-2022). A multiple linear regression model assessed the association of anesthesia type and vasoconstrictor administration with intralymphatic contrast agent transit time, controlled for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 147 lymphangiograms from 141 patients (median age, 64 years [interquartile range, 56-72 years]) were reviewed. Sedation (vs GA) was associated with 43% shorter log-transformed contrast agent transit time (βˆ = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.04-1.97; P = .029), reflecting a 13-minute faster median contrast agent transit time (absolute standardized difference, 0.44). Vasoconstrictor administration was not associated with contrast agent transit time (bolus administration, βˆ = 0.79 [95% CI, 0.53-1.18; P = .251]; infusion and bolus administration, βˆ = 0.89 [95% CI, 0.63-1.25; P = .495]). In addition to its association with increased contrast agent transit time, GA also added a median of 16 minutes (range, 11.0-22.3 minutes) of anesthesiology care time to cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sedation (vs GA), but not vasoconstrictor administration, was associated with shorter contrast agent transit time and anesthesiology care time. This proof-of-concept clinical evidence that anesthesia may modulate lymphatic function sheds light on the lymphatic system as a collateral pharmacologic target of anesthetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":49962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Anesthesia Type and Vasoconstrictor Use with Intranodal Lymphangiography Duration: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Brian J Kinsman, Sara Smolinski-Zhao, Fran D Soljacic, Lingshan Liu, Matthew R Smith, Ariel L Mueller, Timothy T Houle, Katarina J Ruscic\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvir.2025.08.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate whether anesthesia type (sedation vs general anesthesia [GA]) or α<sub>1</sub>-adrenergic agonist vasoconstrictor administration is associated with faster intralymphatic contrast agent transit during intranodal lymphangiography in an effort to identify modifiable nonprocedural factors that may reduce procedure duration.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study reviewed intranodal lymphangiography from 2 academic hospitals (2015-2022). A multiple linear regression model assessed the association of anesthesia type and vasoconstrictor administration with intralymphatic contrast agent transit time, controlled for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 147 lymphangiograms from 141 patients (median age, 64 years [interquartile range, 56-72 years]) were reviewed. Sedation (vs GA) was associated with 43% shorter log-transformed contrast agent transit time (βˆ = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.04-1.97; P = .029), reflecting a 13-minute faster median contrast agent transit time (absolute standardized difference, 0.44). Vasoconstrictor administration was not associated with contrast agent transit time (bolus administration, βˆ = 0.79 [95% CI, 0.53-1.18; P = .251]; infusion and bolus administration, βˆ = 0.89 [95% CI, 0.63-1.25; P = .495]). In addition to its association with increased contrast agent transit time, GA also added a median of 16 minutes (range, 11.0-22.3 minutes) of anesthesiology care time to cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sedation (vs GA), but not vasoconstrictor administration, was associated with shorter contrast agent transit time and anesthesiology care time. This proof-of-concept clinical evidence that anesthesia may modulate lymphatic function sheds light on the lymphatic system as a collateral pharmacologic target of anesthetics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2025.08.026\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2025.08.026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:研究结内淋巴管造影时,麻醉类型(镇静与全麻)或α1肾上腺素能激动剂血管收缩剂是否与更快的淋巴内造影剂转运有关,以确定可能缩短手术时间的可改变的非程序性因素。方法:本回顾性观察性研究回顾了两所学术医院(2015 - 2022)的结内淋巴管造影。多元线性回归模型评估麻醉类型和血管收缩剂给药与淋巴内造影剂传递时间的关系,控制混杂因素。结果:141例患者147张淋巴管造影,中位年龄64岁[56-72岁IQR]。镇静(与全麻相比)与43%的对数转换造影剂传递时间缩短相关(β =1.43, 95% CI 1.04-1.97, P=0.029),反映了13分钟的中位造影剂传递时间缩短(ASD 0.44)。血管收缩剂给药与造影剂传递时间无相关性(大剂量给药:β - =0.79, 95% CI 0.53-1.18, P=0.251;输注和大剂量给药:β - =0.89, 95% CI 0.63-1.25, P=0.495)。除了增加造影剂传递时间外,全身麻醉还使病例的麻醉护理时间中位数增加了16[11.0 - 22.3]分钟。结论:镇静(与全麻相比),而不是血管收缩剂的使用,与更短的造影剂传递时间和麻醉护理时间相关。这一概念验证的临床证据表明,麻醉可以调节淋巴功能,从而阐明淋巴系统作为麻醉药的附带药理学靶点。
Association of Anesthesia Type and Vasoconstrictor Use with Intranodal Lymphangiography Duration: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.
Purpose: To investigate whether anesthesia type (sedation vs general anesthesia [GA]) or α1-adrenergic agonist vasoconstrictor administration is associated with faster intralymphatic contrast agent transit during intranodal lymphangiography in an effort to identify modifiable nonprocedural factors that may reduce procedure duration.
Materials and methods: This retrospective observational study reviewed intranodal lymphangiography from 2 academic hospitals (2015-2022). A multiple linear regression model assessed the association of anesthesia type and vasoconstrictor administration with intralymphatic contrast agent transit time, controlled for confounders.
Results: A total of 147 lymphangiograms from 141 patients (median age, 64 years [interquartile range, 56-72 years]) were reviewed. Sedation (vs GA) was associated with 43% shorter log-transformed contrast agent transit time (βˆ = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.04-1.97; P = .029), reflecting a 13-minute faster median contrast agent transit time (absolute standardized difference, 0.44). Vasoconstrictor administration was not associated with contrast agent transit time (bolus administration, βˆ = 0.79 [95% CI, 0.53-1.18; P = .251]; infusion and bolus administration, βˆ = 0.89 [95% CI, 0.63-1.25; P = .495]). In addition to its association with increased contrast agent transit time, GA also added a median of 16 minutes (range, 11.0-22.3 minutes) of anesthesiology care time to cases.
Conclusions: Sedation (vs GA), but not vasoconstrictor administration, was associated with shorter contrast agent transit time and anesthesiology care time. This proof-of-concept clinical evidence that anesthesia may modulate lymphatic function sheds light on the lymphatic system as a collateral pharmacologic target of anesthetics.
期刊介绍:
JVIR, published continuously since 1990, is an international, monthly peer-reviewed interventional radiology journal. As the official journal of the Society of Interventional Radiology, JVIR is the peer-reviewed journal of choice for interventional radiologists, radiologists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, neurosurgeons, and other clinicians who seek current and reliable information on every aspect of vascular and interventional radiology. Each issue of JVIR covers critical and cutting-edge medical minimally invasive, clinical, basic research, radiological, pathological, and socioeconomic issues of importance to the field.