用静态主观视觉垂直、动态主观视觉垂直和杆架测试评估晕车易感性的视觉-前庭相互作用。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Zahra Polat, Sare Çankaya, Burcu Deniz, Mert Kılıç
{"title":"用静态主观视觉垂直、动态主观视觉垂直和杆架测试评估晕车易感性的视觉-前庭相互作用。","authors":"Zahra Polat, Sare Çankaya, Burcu Deniz, Mert Kılıç","doi":"10.1177/09574271251371540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMotion sickness (MS) occurs when the brain receives conflicting signals about body movement from the visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive systems. The otolith organs play a key role in perceiving verticality, and their function may be influenced by MS susceptibility.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the effect of MS susceptibility on otolith-mediated verticality perception across different head positions.MethodsForty-seven participants were classified into two groups based on the Motion Sickness Susceptibility Questionnaire-Short Form (MSSQ-SF): an MS group (n = 24) and a control group (n = 23). All participants completed static Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV), dynamic Subjective Visual Vertical (DVV), and Rod-and-Frame Test (RFT) using a virtual reality system. Measurements were conducted in three head tilt (upright, 30° left, 30° right). The absolute deviation from true vertical was calculated for each test.ResultsWhile no significant differences were found in SVV performance between groups across head-tilt angles, the MS group exhibited significantly greater deviations in DVV at all positions and in RFT during 30° head tilts. Higher MSSQ scores correlated with greater deviations in DVV and RFT under tilt conditions.ConclusionsAlthough static verticality perception remains intact, individuals with MS exhibit greater deviations under dynamic and visually misleading conditions, suggesting subtle vestibular-perceptual deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":49960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","volume":" ","pages":"9574271251371540"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating visual-vestibular interactions in motion sickness susceptibility with static subjective visual vertical, dynamic subjective visual vertical, and rod-and-frame test.\",\"authors\":\"Zahra Polat, Sare Çankaya, Burcu Deniz, Mert Kılıç\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09574271251371540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundMotion sickness (MS) occurs when the brain receives conflicting signals about body movement from the visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive systems. The otolith organs play a key role in perceiving verticality, and their function may be influenced by MS susceptibility.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the effect of MS susceptibility on otolith-mediated verticality perception across different head positions.MethodsForty-seven participants were classified into two groups based on the Motion Sickness Susceptibility Questionnaire-Short Form (MSSQ-SF): an MS group (n = 24) and a control group (n = 23). All participants completed static Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV), dynamic Subjective Visual Vertical (DVV), and Rod-and-Frame Test (RFT) using a virtual reality system. Measurements were conducted in three head tilt (upright, 30° left, 30° right). The absolute deviation from true vertical was calculated for each test.ResultsWhile no significant differences were found in SVV performance between groups across head-tilt angles, the MS group exhibited significantly greater deviations in DVV at all positions and in RFT during 30° head tilts. Higher MSSQ scores correlated with greater deviations in DVV and RFT under tilt conditions.ConclusionsAlthough static verticality perception remains intact, individuals with MS exhibit greater deviations under dynamic and visually misleading conditions, suggesting subtle vestibular-perceptual deficits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9574271251371540\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09574271251371540\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09574271251371540","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当大脑从视觉系统、前庭系统和本体感觉系统接收到有关身体运动的相互冲突的信号时,就会发生晕动病(MS)。耳石器官在感知垂直度中起关键作用,其功能可能受到MS易感性的影响。目的探讨多发性硬化症易感性对不同头位耳石介导的垂直度感知的影响。方法根据运动病易感性问卷(MSSQ-SF)将47名参与者分为两组:运动病组(n = 24)和对照组(n = 23)。所有参与者使用虚拟现实系统完成了静态主观视觉垂直(SVV)、动态主观视觉垂直(DVV)和杆架测试(RFT)。测量在三个头部倾斜(直立,30°左,30°右)进行。计算每次试验与真垂直的绝对偏差。结果虽然不同头部倾斜角度组间SVV表现无显著差异,但MS组在所有位置的DVV和30°头部倾斜时的RFT表现出显著较大的偏差。在倾斜条件下,MSSQ得分越高,DVV和RFT的偏差越大。结论虽然静态垂直度知觉保持完整,但MS患者在动态和视觉误导条件下表现出更大的偏差,提示微妙的前庭知觉缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating visual-vestibular interactions in motion sickness susceptibility with static subjective visual vertical, dynamic subjective visual vertical, and rod-and-frame test.

BackgroundMotion sickness (MS) occurs when the brain receives conflicting signals about body movement from the visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive systems. The otolith organs play a key role in perceiving verticality, and their function may be influenced by MS susceptibility.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the effect of MS susceptibility on otolith-mediated verticality perception across different head positions.MethodsForty-seven participants were classified into two groups based on the Motion Sickness Susceptibility Questionnaire-Short Form (MSSQ-SF): an MS group (n = 24) and a control group (n = 23). All participants completed static Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV), dynamic Subjective Visual Vertical (DVV), and Rod-and-Frame Test (RFT) using a virtual reality system. Measurements were conducted in three head tilt (upright, 30° left, 30° right). The absolute deviation from true vertical was calculated for each test.ResultsWhile no significant differences were found in SVV performance between groups across head-tilt angles, the MS group exhibited significantly greater deviations in DVV at all positions and in RFT during 30° head tilts. Higher MSSQ scores correlated with greater deviations in DVV and RFT under tilt conditions.ConclusionsAlthough static verticality perception remains intact, individuals with MS exhibit greater deviations under dynamic and visually misleading conditions, suggesting subtle vestibular-perceptual deficits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Vestibular Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes experimental and observational studies, review papers, and theoretical papers based on current knowledge of the vestibular system. Subjects of the studies can include experimental animals, normal humans, and humans with vestibular or other related disorders. Study topics can include the following: Anatomy of the vestibular system, including vestibulo-ocular, vestibulo-spinal, and vestibulo-autonomic pathways Balance disorders Neurochemistry and neuropharmacology of balance, both at the systems and single neuron level Neurophysiology of balance, including the vestibular, ocular motor, autonomic, and postural control systems Psychophysics of spatial orientation Space and motion sickness Vestibular rehabilitation Vestibular-related human performance in various environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信