人工智能在抑郁症药物治疗增强(AID-ME):深度学习支持的个性化抑郁症治疗选择和管理临床决策支持系统的聚类随机试验。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
David Benrimoh, Kate Whitmore, Maud Richard, Grace Golden, Kelly Perlman, Sara Jalali, Timothy Friesen, Youcef Barkat, Joseph Mehltretter, Robert Fratila, Caitrin Armstrong, Sonia Israel, Christina Popescu, Jordan F Karp, Sagar V Parikh, Shirin Golchi, Erica E M Moodie, Junwei Shen, Anthony J Gifuni, Manuela Ferrari, Mamta Sapra, Stefan Kloiber, Georges-F Pinard, Boadie W Dunlop, Karl Looper, Mohini Ranganathan, Martin Enault, Serge Beaulieu, Soham Rej, Fanny Hersson-Edery, Warren Steiner, Alexandra Anacleto, Sabrina Qassim, Rebecca McGuire-Snieckus, Howard C Margolese
{"title":"人工智能在抑郁症药物治疗增强(AID-ME):深度学习支持的个性化抑郁症治疗选择和管理临床决策支持系统的聚类随机试验。","authors":"David Benrimoh, Kate Whitmore, Maud Richard, Grace Golden, Kelly Perlman, Sara Jalali, Timothy Friesen, Youcef Barkat, Joseph Mehltretter, Robert Fratila, Caitrin Armstrong, Sonia Israel, Christina Popescu, Jordan F Karp, Sagar V Parikh, Shirin Golchi, Erica E M Moodie, Junwei Shen, Anthony J Gifuni, Manuela Ferrari, Mamta Sapra, Stefan Kloiber, Georges-F Pinard, Boadie W Dunlop, Karl Looper, Mohini Ranganathan, Martin Enault, Serge Beaulieu, Soham Rej, Fanny Hersson-Edery, Warren Steiner, Alexandra Anacleto, Sabrina Qassim, Rebecca McGuire-Snieckus, Howard C Margolese","doi":"10.4088/JCP.24m15634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> There has been increasing interest in the use of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled clinical decision support systems (CDSS) for the personalization of major depressive disorder (MDD) treatment selection and management, but clinical studies are lacking. We tested whether a CDSS that combines an AI which predicts remission probabilities for individual antidepressants and a clinical algorithm based on treatment can improve MDD outcomes.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> This was a multicenter, cluster randomized, patient-and-rater blinded and clinician-partially-blinded, active-controlled trial that recruited outpatient adults with moderate or greater severity MDD. All patients had access to a patient portal to complete questionnaires. Clinicians in the active group had access to the CDSS; clinicians in the active-control group received patient questionnaires; both groups received guideline training. Primary outcome was remission (<11 points on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]) at study exit.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Forty-seven clinicians were recruited at 9 sites. Of 74 eligible patients, 61 patients completed a postbaseline MADRS and were analyzed. There were no differences in baseline MADRS (<i>P</i> = .153). There were more remitters in the active (n = 12, 28.6%) than in the active-control (0%) group (<i>P</i> = .012, Fisher's exact). Of 3 serious adverse events, none were caused by the CDSS. Speed of improvement was higher in the active than the control group (1.26 vs 0.37, <i>P</i> = .03).</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> While limited by sample size and the lack of primary care clinicians, these results demonstrate preliminary evidence that longitudinal use of an AI-CDSS can improve outcomes in moderate and greater severity MDD.</p><p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04655924.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"86 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence in Depression-Medication Enhancement (AID-ME): A Cluster Randomized Trial of a Deep-Learning-Enabled Clinical Decision Support System for Personalized Depression Treatment Selection and Management.\",\"authors\":\"David Benrimoh, Kate Whitmore, Maud Richard, Grace Golden, Kelly Perlman, Sara Jalali, Timothy Friesen, Youcef Barkat, Joseph Mehltretter, Robert Fratila, Caitrin Armstrong, Sonia Israel, Christina Popescu, Jordan F Karp, Sagar V Parikh, Shirin Golchi, Erica E M Moodie, Junwei Shen, Anthony J Gifuni, Manuela Ferrari, Mamta Sapra, Stefan Kloiber, Georges-F Pinard, Boadie W Dunlop, Karl Looper, Mohini Ranganathan, Martin Enault, Serge Beaulieu, Soham Rej, Fanny Hersson-Edery, Warren Steiner, Alexandra Anacleto, Sabrina Qassim, Rebecca McGuire-Snieckus, Howard C Margolese\",\"doi\":\"10.4088/JCP.24m15634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> There has been increasing interest in the use of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled clinical decision support systems (CDSS) for the personalization of major depressive disorder (MDD) treatment selection and management, but clinical studies are lacking. We tested whether a CDSS that combines an AI which predicts remission probabilities for individual antidepressants and a clinical algorithm based on treatment can improve MDD outcomes.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> This was a multicenter, cluster randomized, patient-and-rater blinded and clinician-partially-blinded, active-controlled trial that recruited outpatient adults with moderate or greater severity MDD. All patients had access to a patient portal to complete questionnaires. Clinicians in the active group had access to the CDSS; clinicians in the active-control group received patient questionnaires; both groups received guideline training. Primary outcome was remission (<11 points on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]) at study exit.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Forty-seven clinicians were recruited at 9 sites. Of 74 eligible patients, 61 patients completed a postbaseline MADRS and were analyzed. There were no differences in baseline MADRS (<i>P</i> = .153). There were more remitters in the active (n = 12, 28.6%) than in the active-control (0%) group (<i>P</i> = .012, Fisher's exact). Of 3 serious adverse events, none were caused by the CDSS. Speed of improvement was higher in the active than the control group (1.26 vs 0.37, <i>P</i> = .03).</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> While limited by sample size and the lack of primary care clinicians, these results demonstrate preliminary evidence that longitudinal use of an AI-CDSS can improve outcomes in moderate and greater severity MDD.</p><p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04655924.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"86 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.24m15634\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.24m15634","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人们对使用人工智能(AI)支持的临床决策支持系统(CDSS)进行重度抑郁症(MDD)治疗选择和管理的个性化越来越感兴趣,但缺乏临床研究。我们测试了结合预测个体抗抑郁药物缓解概率的人工智能和基于治疗的临床算法的CDSS是否可以改善重度抑郁症的结果。方法:这是一项多中心、集群随机、患者-评分盲和临床-部分盲、主动对照的试验,招募了患有中度或更严重重度重度抑郁症的门诊成年人。所有患者都可以访问患者门户网站来完成问卷调查。积极组临床医生可以使用CDSS;积极对照组的临床医生收到患者问卷;两组均接受指南培训。主要结局是缓解(结果:在9个地点招募了47名临床医生。在74名符合条件的患者中,61名患者完成了基线后MADRS并进行了分析。基线MADRS无差异(P = .153)。积极组(n = 12, 28.6%)的缓解者多于积极对照组(0%)(P = 0.012, Fisher精确)。3例严重不良事件中,无CDSS引起。治疗组改善速度高于对照组(1.26 vs 0.37, P = 0.03)。结论:虽然受样本量和缺乏初级保健临床医生的限制,这些结果显示了初步证据,即纵向使用AI-CDSS可以改善中度和更严重重度重度抑郁症的预后。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04655924。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Intelligence in Depression-Medication Enhancement (AID-ME): A Cluster Randomized Trial of a Deep-Learning-Enabled Clinical Decision Support System for Personalized Depression Treatment Selection and Management.

Background: There has been increasing interest in the use of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled clinical decision support systems (CDSS) for the personalization of major depressive disorder (MDD) treatment selection and management, but clinical studies are lacking. We tested whether a CDSS that combines an AI which predicts remission probabilities for individual antidepressants and a clinical algorithm based on treatment can improve MDD outcomes.

Methods: This was a multicenter, cluster randomized, patient-and-rater blinded and clinician-partially-blinded, active-controlled trial that recruited outpatient adults with moderate or greater severity MDD. All patients had access to a patient portal to complete questionnaires. Clinicians in the active group had access to the CDSS; clinicians in the active-control group received patient questionnaires; both groups received guideline training. Primary outcome was remission (<11 points on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]) at study exit.

Results: Forty-seven clinicians were recruited at 9 sites. Of 74 eligible patients, 61 patients completed a postbaseline MADRS and were analyzed. There were no differences in baseline MADRS (P = .153). There were more remitters in the active (n = 12, 28.6%) than in the active-control (0%) group (P = .012, Fisher's exact). Of 3 serious adverse events, none were caused by the CDSS. Speed of improvement was higher in the active than the control group (1.26 vs 0.37, P = .03).

Conclusions: While limited by sample size and the lack of primary care clinicians, these results demonstrate preliminary evidence that longitudinal use of an AI-CDSS can improve outcomes in moderate and greater severity MDD.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04655924.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 75 years, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry has been a leading source of peer-reviewed articles offering the latest information on mental health topics to psychiatrists and other medical professionals.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry is the leading psychiatric resource for clinical information and covers disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, addiction, posttraumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder while exploring the newest advances in diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信