{"title":"【住院治疗期间自杀的责任】。","authors":"Johannes Kornhuber, Antonia Stummvoll","doi":"10.1007/s00115-025-01889-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suicide during inpatient treatment represents distressing events for clinics and medical staff while raising questions about liability consequences. They require a differentiated approach balancing patient protection and therapeutic necessities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze long-standing case law to identify practice-relevant principles for clinical risk management regarding suicidal ideation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Systematic evaluation of 22 decisions from German high and supreme courts (1985-2025) concerning suicides during inpatient treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Case law acknowledges the impossibility of absolute suicide prevention and grants psychiatric treatment teams considerable discretionary latitude. The legal assessment is based on the treating physician's ex-ante perspective. Specific duties of care arise in cases of acute suicidal ideation, risk situations such as therapeutic relaxations and necessary structural and organizational measures. The balance between security interests and therapeutic requirements remains central.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The jurisprudence demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the clinical challenges in suicide prevention. The identified assessment standards provide orientation for the clinical practice and emphasize the necessity of individual risk assessments and documentation of all relevant decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49770,"journal":{"name":"Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Liability in cases of suicide during inpatient treatment].\",\"authors\":\"Johannes Kornhuber, Antonia Stummvoll\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00115-025-01889-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suicide during inpatient treatment represents distressing events for clinics and medical staff while raising questions about liability consequences. They require a differentiated approach balancing patient protection and therapeutic necessities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze long-standing case law to identify practice-relevant principles for clinical risk management regarding suicidal ideation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Systematic evaluation of 22 decisions from German high and supreme courts (1985-2025) concerning suicides during inpatient treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Case law acknowledges the impossibility of absolute suicide prevention and grants psychiatric treatment teams considerable discretionary latitude. The legal assessment is based on the treating physician's ex-ante perspective. Specific duties of care arise in cases of acute suicidal ideation, risk situations such as therapeutic relaxations and necessary structural and organizational measures. The balance between security interests and therapeutic requirements remains central.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The jurisprudence demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the clinical challenges in suicide prevention. The identified assessment standards provide orientation for the clinical practice and emphasize the necessity of individual risk assessments and documentation of all relevant decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nervenarzt\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nervenarzt\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-025-01889-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nervenarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-025-01889-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Liability in cases of suicide during inpatient treatment].
Background: Suicide during inpatient treatment represents distressing events for clinics and medical staff while raising questions about liability consequences. They require a differentiated approach balancing patient protection and therapeutic necessities.
Objective: To analyze long-standing case law to identify practice-relevant principles for clinical risk management regarding suicidal ideation.
Material and methods: Systematic evaluation of 22 decisions from German high and supreme courts (1985-2025) concerning suicides during inpatient treatment.
Results: Case law acknowledges the impossibility of absolute suicide prevention and grants psychiatric treatment teams considerable discretionary latitude. The legal assessment is based on the treating physician's ex-ante perspective. Specific duties of care arise in cases of acute suicidal ideation, risk situations such as therapeutic relaxations and necessary structural and organizational measures. The balance between security interests and therapeutic requirements remains central.
Conclusion: The jurisprudence demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the clinical challenges in suicide prevention. The identified assessment standards provide orientation for the clinical practice and emphasize the necessity of individual risk assessments and documentation of all relevant decisions.
期刊介绍:
Der Nervenarzt is an internationally recognized journal addressing neurologists and psychiatrists working in clinical or practical environments. Essential findings and current information from neurology, psychiatry as well as neuropathology, neurosurgery up to psychotherapy are presented.
Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of neurology and psychiatry.
Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange.
Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.