Yanzeng Zhao, Keyong Zhu, Wei Guo, Haixin Xu, Jun Zhang, Jiaying Zou, Runhao Li, Lijing Wang
{"title":"通过多模态生理学来区分飞行员的痛苦和压力:在智能驾驶舱中增强人类系统的整合。","authors":"Yanzeng Zhao, Keyong Zhu, Wei Guo, Haixin Xu, Jun Zhang, Jiaying Zou, Runhao Li, Lijing Wang","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2025.2553131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ensuring safety in next-generation intelligent cockpits demands accurate assessment of pilot states, particularly distinguishing between eustress and distress. Traditional stress monitoring lacks this nuance and struggles across varying flight tasks. This study proposes a multimodal neuro-cardiac framework combining functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and electrocardiography (ECG) to differentiate eustress and distress across tasks. Physiological data were collected from 35 participants under simulated flight missions inducing both stress types. Eleven features showing significant differentiation were identified and used to train classification models with machine learning algorithms. The model achieved 83.04% accuracy across tasks, and up to 90.83% within single tasks. These findings demonstrate the robustness of fNIRS-ECG-based monitoring in pilot stress classification. The proposed method offers objective biomarkers critical for adaptive intelligent cockpit systems, contributing directly to flight safety and human-machine interaction optimisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differentiating pilot distress and eustress via multimodal physiology: towards enhanced human-system integration in intelligent cockpits.\",\"authors\":\"Yanzeng Zhao, Keyong Zhu, Wei Guo, Haixin Xu, Jun Zhang, Jiaying Zou, Runhao Li, Lijing Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00140139.2025.2553131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ensuring safety in next-generation intelligent cockpits demands accurate assessment of pilot states, particularly distinguishing between eustress and distress. Traditional stress monitoring lacks this nuance and struggles across varying flight tasks. This study proposes a multimodal neuro-cardiac framework combining functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and electrocardiography (ECG) to differentiate eustress and distress across tasks. Physiological data were collected from 35 participants under simulated flight missions inducing both stress types. Eleven features showing significant differentiation were identified and used to train classification models with machine learning algorithms. The model achieved 83.04% accuracy across tasks, and up to 90.83% within single tasks. These findings demonstrate the robustness of fNIRS-ECG-based monitoring in pilot stress classification. The proposed method offers objective biomarkers critical for adaptive intelligent cockpit systems, contributing directly to flight safety and human-machine interaction optimisation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2553131\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2553131","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differentiating pilot distress and eustress via multimodal physiology: towards enhanced human-system integration in intelligent cockpits.
Ensuring safety in next-generation intelligent cockpits demands accurate assessment of pilot states, particularly distinguishing between eustress and distress. Traditional stress monitoring lacks this nuance and struggles across varying flight tasks. This study proposes a multimodal neuro-cardiac framework combining functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and electrocardiography (ECG) to differentiate eustress and distress across tasks. Physiological data were collected from 35 participants under simulated flight missions inducing both stress types. Eleven features showing significant differentiation were identified and used to train classification models with machine learning algorithms. The model achieved 83.04% accuracy across tasks, and up to 90.83% within single tasks. These findings demonstrate the robustness of fNIRS-ECG-based monitoring in pilot stress classification. The proposed method offers objective biomarkers critical for adaptive intelligent cockpit systems, contributing directly to flight safety and human-machine interaction optimisation.
期刊介绍:
Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives.
The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people.
All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.