心脏手术出血量的计算:如何监测?

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yerlan Orazymbetov, Serik Aitaliyev, Povilas Jakuška, Audronė Veikutienė, Tadas Lenkutis, Rassul Zhumagaliyev, Aušra Saudargienė, Rimantas Benetis
{"title":"心脏手术出血量的计算:如何监测?","authors":"Yerlan Orazymbetov, Serik Aitaliyev, Povilas Jakuška, Audronė Veikutienė, Tadas Lenkutis, Rassul Zhumagaliyev, Aušra Saudargienė, Rimantas Benetis","doi":"10.1177/02676591251370110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe bleeding in cardiac surgery remains a significant clinical problem. There is no \"gold standard\" method to quantify blood loss. Traditional measurement of drainage volume often underestimates or overestimates, as it does not consider the type of fluid. We hypothesized that blood loss could be more accurately calculated using the Hb/kg index in terms of haemoglobin (Hb) mass loss per kilogram of the patient's body mass. This study aimed to ObjectiveTo develop a novel approach for calculating actual blood loss using the Hb/kg index.MethodsThis single-center prospective study included 195 patients who underwent cardiac surgery between October 2023 and November 2024. The Hb/kg index was calculated based on intraoperative Hb loss, Hb loss via chest tubes, packed red blood cell transfusions and patient weight. Eighty-six additional clinical predictors were analyzed using conventional statistics and machine learning algorithms. Predictors with statistically significant Spearman correlations were included for further analysis.ResultsLasso regression achieved the best overall performance in predicting Hb/kg index. It yielded the lowest mean squared error (0.08 ± 0.04), mean absolute percentage error (0.18 ± 0.10), with the highest correlation (0.92 ± 0.06) and R² score (0.82 ± 0.13). BMI showed a significant negative relationship (-0.018, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Postoperative Hb and haematocrit values had negative correlation (-0.69, <i>p</i> < 0.001 and -0.07, <i>p</i> < 0.015), while initial Hb was positively correlated (0.85, <i>p</i> < 0.001).ConclusionsThis method provides a more reliable and clinically relevant tool to calculate actual blood loss and allows for a more precise assessment and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49707,"journal":{"name":"Perfusion-Uk","volume":" ","pages":"2676591251370110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calculation of blood loss in cardiac surgery: How should we monitor?\",\"authors\":\"Yerlan Orazymbetov, Serik Aitaliyev, Povilas Jakuška, Audronė Veikutienė, Tadas Lenkutis, Rassul Zhumagaliyev, Aušra Saudargienė, Rimantas Benetis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02676591251370110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundThe bleeding in cardiac surgery remains a significant clinical problem. There is no \\\"gold standard\\\" method to quantify blood loss. Traditional measurement of drainage volume often underestimates or overestimates, as it does not consider the type of fluid. We hypothesized that blood loss could be more accurately calculated using the Hb/kg index in terms of haemoglobin (Hb) mass loss per kilogram of the patient's body mass. This study aimed to ObjectiveTo develop a novel approach for calculating actual blood loss using the Hb/kg index.MethodsThis single-center prospective study included 195 patients who underwent cardiac surgery between October 2023 and November 2024. The Hb/kg index was calculated based on intraoperative Hb loss, Hb loss via chest tubes, packed red blood cell transfusions and patient weight. Eighty-six additional clinical predictors were analyzed using conventional statistics and machine learning algorithms. Predictors with statistically significant Spearman correlations were included for further analysis.ResultsLasso regression achieved the best overall performance in predicting Hb/kg index. It yielded the lowest mean squared error (0.08 ± 0.04), mean absolute percentage error (0.18 ± 0.10), with the highest correlation (0.92 ± 0.06) and R² score (0.82 ± 0.13). BMI showed a significant negative relationship (-0.018, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Postoperative Hb and haematocrit values had negative correlation (-0.69, <i>p</i> < 0.001 and -0.07, <i>p</i> < 0.015), while initial Hb was positively correlated (0.85, <i>p</i> < 0.001).ConclusionsThis method provides a more reliable and clinically relevant tool to calculate actual blood loss and allows for a more precise assessment and treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perfusion-Uk\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2676591251370110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perfusion-Uk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591251370110\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perfusion-Uk","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591251370110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景心脏手术出血是一个重要的临床问题。没有量化失血量的“金标准”方法。传统的排液量测量往往低估或高估了排液量,因为它没有考虑流体的类型。我们假设,根据每公斤患者体重的血红蛋白(Hb)质量损失,使用Hb/kg指数可以更准确地计算失血量。本研究旨在开发一种利用Hb/kg指数计算实际失血量的新方法。方法这项单中心前瞻性研究纳入了195例于2023年10月至2024年11月接受心脏手术的患者。Hb/kg指数根据术中Hb损失、胸管Hb损失、填充红细胞输注和患者体重计算。使用常规统计学和机器学习算法分析了86个额外的临床预测因子。统计上具有显著Spearman相关性的预测因子被纳入进一步分析。结果lasso回归预测Hb/kg指数的综合性能最好。均方误差最小(0.08±0.04),平均绝对百分比误差最小(0.18±0.10),相关系数最高(0.92±0.06),R²评分最高(0.82±0.13)。BMI呈显著负相关(-0.018,p < 0.001)。术后Hb与红细胞压积呈负相关(-0.69,p < 0.001和-0.07,p < 0.015),而初始Hb呈正相关(0.85,p < 0.001)。结论该方法为实际失血量的计算提供了一种更可靠和临床相关的工具,可以更精确地评估和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Calculation of blood loss in cardiac surgery: How should we monitor?

BackgroundThe bleeding in cardiac surgery remains a significant clinical problem. There is no "gold standard" method to quantify blood loss. Traditional measurement of drainage volume often underestimates or overestimates, as it does not consider the type of fluid. We hypothesized that blood loss could be more accurately calculated using the Hb/kg index in terms of haemoglobin (Hb) mass loss per kilogram of the patient's body mass. This study aimed to ObjectiveTo develop a novel approach for calculating actual blood loss using the Hb/kg index.MethodsThis single-center prospective study included 195 patients who underwent cardiac surgery between October 2023 and November 2024. The Hb/kg index was calculated based on intraoperative Hb loss, Hb loss via chest tubes, packed red blood cell transfusions and patient weight. Eighty-six additional clinical predictors were analyzed using conventional statistics and machine learning algorithms. Predictors with statistically significant Spearman correlations were included for further analysis.ResultsLasso regression achieved the best overall performance in predicting Hb/kg index. It yielded the lowest mean squared error (0.08 ± 0.04), mean absolute percentage error (0.18 ± 0.10), with the highest correlation (0.92 ± 0.06) and R² score (0.82 ± 0.13). BMI showed a significant negative relationship (-0.018, p < 0.001). Postoperative Hb and haematocrit values had negative correlation (-0.69, p < 0.001 and -0.07, p < 0.015), while initial Hb was positively correlated (0.85, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThis method provides a more reliable and clinically relevant tool to calculate actual blood loss and allows for a more precise assessment and treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perfusion-Uk
Perfusion-Uk 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perfusion is an ISI-ranked, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, which provides current information on all aspects of perfusion, oxygenation and biocompatibility and their use in modern cardiac surgery. The journal is at the forefront of international research and development and presents an appropriately multidisciplinary approach to perfusion science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信