通过基于场景的评估培养未来纳米科学专业人员的伦理责任。

IF 3 2区 哲学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Yana Suchikova, Serhii Kovachov, Olena Kryvylova, Anastasia Popova, Hanna Mytsyk, Maryna Nesterenko, Kristina Petryk, Natalia Tsybuliak, Hanna Lopatina
{"title":"通过基于场景的评估培养未来纳米科学专业人员的伦理责任。","authors":"Yana Suchikova, Serhii Kovachov, Olena Kryvylova, Anastasia Popova, Hanna Mytsyk, Maryna Nesterenko, Kristina Petryk, Natalia Tsybuliak, Hanna Lopatina","doi":"10.1007/s11948-025-00549-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates the formation of ethical responsibility among master's students enrolled in the \"Applied Physics and Nanomaterials\" program. Recognizing the pivotal role of ethics in the evolving field of nanoscience, the research implements a three-phase methodology that integrates an Initial Ethical Responsibility Assessment, a facilitator-led Group Discussion, and a Retest Ethical Responsibility Assessment. The assessments are based on realistic scenarios reflecting ethical dilemmas that students may encounter in professional practice. This dual approach - combining quantitative assessment with qualitative analysis - provides a comprehensive understanding of students' ethical reasoning and decision-making. Results indicate varying levels of ethical responsibility, underscoring the need for more integrated ethics education in nanoscience curricula. The study contributes to ongoing discussions on the importance of ethics in scientific training, especially in high-impact fields such as nanotechnology. It offers educators a structured framework for embedding ethics into technical education, ensuring that future nanomaterials specialists are not only proficient scientists but also ethically responsible professionals. The article concludes with recommendations for enhancing ethics education in nanoscience through interactive, scenario-based, and discussion-centered learning methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":49564,"journal":{"name":"Science and Engineering Ethics","volume":"31 5","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing Ethical Responsibility in Future Nanoscience Professionals Through Scenario-Based Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Yana Suchikova, Serhii Kovachov, Olena Kryvylova, Anastasia Popova, Hanna Mytsyk, Maryna Nesterenko, Kristina Petryk, Natalia Tsybuliak, Hanna Lopatina\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11948-025-00549-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluates the formation of ethical responsibility among master's students enrolled in the \\\"Applied Physics and Nanomaterials\\\" program. Recognizing the pivotal role of ethics in the evolving field of nanoscience, the research implements a three-phase methodology that integrates an Initial Ethical Responsibility Assessment, a facilitator-led Group Discussion, and a Retest Ethical Responsibility Assessment. The assessments are based on realistic scenarios reflecting ethical dilemmas that students may encounter in professional practice. This dual approach - combining quantitative assessment with qualitative analysis - provides a comprehensive understanding of students' ethical reasoning and decision-making. Results indicate varying levels of ethical responsibility, underscoring the need for more integrated ethics education in nanoscience curricula. The study contributes to ongoing discussions on the importance of ethics in scientific training, especially in high-impact fields such as nanotechnology. It offers educators a structured framework for embedding ethics into technical education, ensuring that future nanomaterials specialists are not only proficient scientists but also ethically responsible professionals. The article concludes with recommendations for enhancing ethics education in nanoscience through interactive, scenario-based, and discussion-centered learning methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science and Engineering Ethics\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370829/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science and Engineering Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-025-00549-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Engineering Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-025-00549-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了“应用物理与纳米材料”专业硕士生伦理责任的形成。认识到伦理在纳米科学发展领域中的关键作用,该研究实施了一个三阶段的方法,该方法集成了初始伦理责任评估、促进者领导的小组讨论和重新测试伦理责任评估。评估基于反映学生在专业实践中可能遇到的道德困境的现实情景。这种将定量评估与定性分析相结合的双重方法,提供了对学生道德推理和决策的全面理解。结果表明了不同程度的伦理责任,强调了在纳米科学课程中进行更综合的伦理教育的必要性。这项研究有助于正在进行的关于伦理在科学培训中的重要性的讨论,特别是在诸如纳米技术这样的高影响力领域。它为教育工作者提供了一个将伦理嵌入技术教育的结构化框架,确保未来的纳米材料专家不仅是精通的科学家,而且是有道德责任感的专业人士。文章最后提出了通过互动、基于场景和以讨论为中心的学习方法加强纳米科学伦理教育的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Developing Ethical Responsibility in Future Nanoscience Professionals Through Scenario-Based Assessment.

Developing Ethical Responsibility in Future Nanoscience Professionals Through Scenario-Based Assessment.

This study evaluates the formation of ethical responsibility among master's students enrolled in the "Applied Physics and Nanomaterials" program. Recognizing the pivotal role of ethics in the evolving field of nanoscience, the research implements a three-phase methodology that integrates an Initial Ethical Responsibility Assessment, a facilitator-led Group Discussion, and a Retest Ethical Responsibility Assessment. The assessments are based on realistic scenarios reflecting ethical dilemmas that students may encounter in professional practice. This dual approach - combining quantitative assessment with qualitative analysis - provides a comprehensive understanding of students' ethical reasoning and decision-making. Results indicate varying levels of ethical responsibility, underscoring the need for more integrated ethics education in nanoscience curricula. The study contributes to ongoing discussions on the importance of ethics in scientific training, especially in high-impact fields such as nanotechnology. It offers educators a structured framework for embedding ethics into technical education, ensuring that future nanomaterials specialists are not only proficient scientists but also ethically responsible professionals. The article concludes with recommendations for enhancing ethics education in nanoscience through interactive, scenario-based, and discussion-centered learning methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science and Engineering Ethics
Science and Engineering Ethics 综合性期刊-工程:综合
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Science and Engineering Ethics is an international multidisciplinary journal dedicated to exploring ethical issues associated with science and engineering, covering professional education, research and practice as well as the effects of technological innovations and research findings on society. While the focus of this journal is on science and engineering, contributions from a broad range of disciplines, including social sciences and humanities, are welcomed. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to, ethics of new and emerging technologies, research ethics, computer ethics, energy ethics, animals and human subjects ethics, ethics education in science and engineering, ethics in design, biomedical ethics, values in technology and innovation. We welcome contributions that deal with these issues from an international perspective, particularly from countries that are underrepresented in these discussions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信