Abdelaziz Amllay, Andrew B Koo, Daniela Renedo, Varun Padmanaban, Ben Teasdale, Ryan M Hebert, Anil Arat, Taylor Duda, Joseph Schindler, Christopher J Stapleton, James D Rabinov, Aman B Patel, Charles C Matouk, Nanthiya Sujijantarat
{"title":"现代颈动脉血管重建术:颈动脉内膜切除术、颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术以及经颈动脉血管重建术的比较综述。","authors":"Abdelaziz Amllay, Andrew B Koo, Daniela Renedo, Varun Padmanaban, Ben Teasdale, Ryan M Hebert, Anil Arat, Taylor Duda, Joseph Schindler, Christopher J Stapleton, James D Rabinov, Aman B Patel, Charles C Matouk, Nanthiya Sujijantarat","doi":"10.1055/a-2685-3141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carotid artery stenosis is a major cause of acute ischemic stroke, accounting for approximately 15% of cases. Although optimal medical therapy remains the cornerstone of management, current guidelines recommend consideration of surgical intervention for symptomatic patients with ≥50% stenosis and asymptomatic patients with ≥70% stenosis. Extensive evidence supports carotid endarterectomy (CEA) as the gold standard procedure, whereas transfemoral carotid angioplasty and stenting (TF-CAS) and transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) offer safe alternatives for patients with high surgical risk. Emerging data suggest that TCAR provides safety and efficacy profiles comparable to CEA and superior to TF-CAS in select patients. Considering these findings, selecting an appropriate revascularization strategy should rely on a multidisciplinary, individualized risk-benefit assessment. This article aims to provide a comparative review of the latest evidence on clinical indications, surgical techniques, and outcomes for current carotid revascularization strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49544,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carotid Revascularization in the Modern Era: A Comparative Review of Carotid Endarterectomy, Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting, and Transcarotid Artery Revascularization.\",\"authors\":\"Abdelaziz Amllay, Andrew B Koo, Daniela Renedo, Varun Padmanaban, Ben Teasdale, Ryan M Hebert, Anil Arat, Taylor Duda, Joseph Schindler, Christopher J Stapleton, James D Rabinov, Aman B Patel, Charles C Matouk, Nanthiya Sujijantarat\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2685-3141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Carotid artery stenosis is a major cause of acute ischemic stroke, accounting for approximately 15% of cases. Although optimal medical therapy remains the cornerstone of management, current guidelines recommend consideration of surgical intervention for symptomatic patients with ≥50% stenosis and asymptomatic patients with ≥70% stenosis. Extensive evidence supports carotid endarterectomy (CEA) as the gold standard procedure, whereas transfemoral carotid angioplasty and stenting (TF-CAS) and transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) offer safe alternatives for patients with high surgical risk. Emerging data suggest that TCAR provides safety and efficacy profiles comparable to CEA and superior to TF-CAS in select patients. Considering these findings, selecting an appropriate revascularization strategy should rely on a multidisciplinary, individualized risk-benefit assessment. This article aims to provide a comparative review of the latest evidence on clinical indications, surgical techniques, and outcomes for current carotid revascularization strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2685-3141\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2685-3141","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Carotid Revascularization in the Modern Era: A Comparative Review of Carotid Endarterectomy, Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting, and Transcarotid Artery Revascularization.
Carotid artery stenosis is a major cause of acute ischemic stroke, accounting for approximately 15% of cases. Although optimal medical therapy remains the cornerstone of management, current guidelines recommend consideration of surgical intervention for symptomatic patients with ≥50% stenosis and asymptomatic patients with ≥70% stenosis. Extensive evidence supports carotid endarterectomy (CEA) as the gold standard procedure, whereas transfemoral carotid angioplasty and stenting (TF-CAS) and transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) offer safe alternatives for patients with high surgical risk. Emerging data suggest that TCAR provides safety and efficacy profiles comparable to CEA and superior to TF-CAS in select patients. Considering these findings, selecting an appropriate revascularization strategy should rely on a multidisciplinary, individualized risk-benefit assessment. This article aims to provide a comparative review of the latest evidence on clinical indications, surgical techniques, and outcomes for current carotid revascularization strategies.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Neurology is a review journal on current trends in the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of neurological diseases. Areas of coverage include multiple sclerosis, central nervous system infections, muscular dystrophy, neuro-immunology, spinal disorders, strokes, epilepsy, motor neuron diseases, movement disorders, higher cortical function, neuro-genetics and neuro-ophthamology. Each issue is presented under the direction of an expert guest editor, and invited contributors focus on a single, high-interest clinical topic.
Up-to-the-minute coverage of the latest information in the field makes this journal an invaluable resource for neurologists and residents.