接受风险和信心评估雪崩地形和条件:一个大的横断面研究。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Cameron C Shonnard, Rondo J Bauer, Lingchen Wang, David C Fiore
{"title":"接受风险和信心评估雪崩地形和条件:一个大的横断面研究。","authors":"Cameron C Shonnard, Rondo J Bauer, Lingchen Wang, David C Fiore","doi":"10.1177/10806032251368754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic affected the ski industry globally, including limiting access to ski resorts and prompting more skiers and snowboarders to explore the backcountry. In this study, we quantified the willingness to take risks (risk propensity) and self-perceived ability to assess hazards in the backcountry and to explore correlations between these factors.MethodsWe based our study on a previously reported data set gathered under the supervision of our senior author, who collected anonymous responses to a 29-question online survey completed by 4792 self-identified backcountry skiers and snowboarders (aged ≥18 yr) in the United States and Canada. The survey was distributed primarily through regional avalanche centers, education providers, and skiing organizations. Pearson correlation coefficients and multivariable linear regression models were used to analyze associations among variables. More specifically, we examined the relationships among confidence in assessing avalanche terrain and willingness to take risks, level of avalanche training, years of experience, and days per season of backcountry skiing.ResultsWe identified a positive correlation between confidence in assessing avalanche terrain and willingness to take risks, level of avalanche training, years of experience, and days per season of backcountry skiing. Female respondents demonstrated lower risk willingness and self-reported ability to assess avalanche risk compared to males. Over 30% of individuals lacking level 1 avalanche training expressed confidence in appraising complex terrain. Our findings demonstrated a positive correlation between greater risk propensity, formal avalanche education, and increasing confidence in assessing avalanche terrain. However, we also observed concerningly high confidence levels among skiers with minimal or no training.ConclusionsAvalanche education should focus on aligning skiers' confidence with their actual abilities to reduce overconfidence and enhance safety. We recommend that future research aim to include a more diverse sample, especially those less engaged in formal avalanche education.</p>","PeriodicalId":49360,"journal":{"name":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"10806032251368754"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptance of Risk and Confidence Assessing Avalanche Terrain and Conditions: A Large Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Cameron C Shonnard, Rondo J Bauer, Lingchen Wang, David C Fiore\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10806032251368754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic affected the ski industry globally, including limiting access to ski resorts and prompting more skiers and snowboarders to explore the backcountry. In this study, we quantified the willingness to take risks (risk propensity) and self-perceived ability to assess hazards in the backcountry and to explore correlations between these factors.MethodsWe based our study on a previously reported data set gathered under the supervision of our senior author, who collected anonymous responses to a 29-question online survey completed by 4792 self-identified backcountry skiers and snowboarders (aged ≥18 yr) in the United States and Canada. The survey was distributed primarily through regional avalanche centers, education providers, and skiing organizations. Pearson correlation coefficients and multivariable linear regression models were used to analyze associations among variables. More specifically, we examined the relationships among confidence in assessing avalanche terrain and willingness to take risks, level of avalanche training, years of experience, and days per season of backcountry skiing.ResultsWe identified a positive correlation between confidence in assessing avalanche terrain and willingness to take risks, level of avalanche training, years of experience, and days per season of backcountry skiing. Female respondents demonstrated lower risk willingness and self-reported ability to assess avalanche risk compared to males. Over 30% of individuals lacking level 1 avalanche training expressed confidence in appraising complex terrain. Our findings demonstrated a positive correlation between greater risk propensity, formal avalanche education, and increasing confidence in assessing avalanche terrain. However, we also observed concerningly high confidence levels among skiers with minimal or no training.ConclusionsAvalanche education should focus on aligning skiers' confidence with their actual abilities to reduce overconfidence and enhance safety. We recommend that future research aim to include a more diverse sample, especially those less engaged in formal avalanche education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10806032251368754\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032251368754\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032251368754","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19大流行影响了全球的滑雪产业,包括限制进入滑雪场,并促使更多的滑雪者和滑雪板爱好者探索偏远地区。在这项研究中,我们量化了冒险意愿(风险倾向)和评估野外危险的自我感知能力,并探讨了这些因素之间的相关性。方法:我们的研究基于先前报道的数据集,这些数据集是在资深作者的监督下收集的,资深作者收集了4792名来自美国和加拿大的自称为野外滑雪和单板滑雪运动员(年龄≥18岁)的29个问题的在线调查的匿名回复。这项调查主要通过地区雪崩中心、教育机构和滑雪组织进行。采用Pearson相关系数和多变量线性回归模型分析变量间的相关性。更具体地说,我们研究了评估雪崩地形和冒险意愿的信心、雪崩训练水平、经验年数和每个季节的野外滑雪天数之间的关系。结果:我们发现,评估雪崩地形的信心与冒险意愿、雪崩训练水平、经验年数和每个季节的野外滑雪天数呈正相关。与男性相比,女性受访者表现出较低的风险意愿和自我报告评估雪崩风险的能力。超过30%缺乏一级雪崩训练的人对评估复杂地形有信心。我们的研究结果表明,更高的风险倾向、正规的雪崩教育和对雪崩地形评估的信心增加之间存在正相关关系。然而,我们也观察到很少或没有训练的滑雪者有很高的自信水平。结论雪崩教育应注重使滑雪者的自信心与实际能力保持一致,以减少过度自信,提高安全性。我们建议未来的研究目标包括更多样化的样本,特别是那些较少参与正规雪崩教育的样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acceptance of Risk and Confidence Assessing Avalanche Terrain and Conditions: A Large Cross-Sectional Study.

IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic affected the ski industry globally, including limiting access to ski resorts and prompting more skiers and snowboarders to explore the backcountry. In this study, we quantified the willingness to take risks (risk propensity) and self-perceived ability to assess hazards in the backcountry and to explore correlations between these factors.MethodsWe based our study on a previously reported data set gathered under the supervision of our senior author, who collected anonymous responses to a 29-question online survey completed by 4792 self-identified backcountry skiers and snowboarders (aged ≥18 yr) in the United States and Canada. The survey was distributed primarily through regional avalanche centers, education providers, and skiing organizations. Pearson correlation coefficients and multivariable linear regression models were used to analyze associations among variables. More specifically, we examined the relationships among confidence in assessing avalanche terrain and willingness to take risks, level of avalanche training, years of experience, and days per season of backcountry skiing.ResultsWe identified a positive correlation between confidence in assessing avalanche terrain and willingness to take risks, level of avalanche training, years of experience, and days per season of backcountry skiing. Female respondents demonstrated lower risk willingness and self-reported ability to assess avalanche risk compared to males. Over 30% of individuals lacking level 1 avalanche training expressed confidence in appraising complex terrain. Our findings demonstrated a positive correlation between greater risk propensity, formal avalanche education, and increasing confidence in assessing avalanche terrain. However, we also observed concerningly high confidence levels among skiers with minimal or no training.ConclusionsAvalanche education should focus on aligning skiers' confidence with their actual abilities to reduce overconfidence and enhance safety. We recommend that future research aim to include a more diverse sample, especially those less engaged in formal avalanche education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, the official journal of the Wilderness Medical Society, is the leading journal for physicians practicing medicine in austere environments. This quarterly journal features articles on all aspects of wilderness medicine, including high altitude and climbing, cold- and heat-related phenomena, natural environmental disasters, immersion and near-drowning, diving, and barotrauma, hazardous plants/animals/insects/marine animals, animal attacks, search and rescue, ethical and legal issues, aeromedial transport, survival physiology, medicine in remote environments, travel medicine, operational medicine, and wilderness trauma management. It presents original research and clinical reports from scientists and practitioners around the globe. WEM invites submissions from authors who want to take advantage of our established publication''s unique scope, wide readership, and international recognition in the field of wilderness medicine. Its readership is a diverse group of medical and outdoor professionals who choose WEM as their primary wilderness medical resource.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信