调查胫骨假体对齐实践:马来西亚,约旦和沙特阿拉伯的横断面研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Mohammad S Malaheem, Nasrul Anuar Abd Razak, Noor Azuan Abu Osman
{"title":"调查胫骨假体对齐实践:马来西亚,约旦和沙特阿拉伯的横断面研究。","authors":"Mohammad S Malaheem, Nasrul Anuar Abd Razak, Noor Azuan Abu Osman","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prosthetic alignment is a critical factor in the functionality and comfort of transtibial prostheses, which are still based on amputee's feedback prosthetist experience and clinical judgment. Proper alignment involves a series of procedures, including bench, static, and dynamic alignment, each contributing to the overall success of the prosthesis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This cross-sectional study aims to explore transtibial prosthetic alignment practices among prosthetists in Malaysia, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, focusing on the associations of demographic data, occupational status, and knowledge on common prosthetic alignment guidelines.Study Design:A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey-based approach among experienced prosthetists was conducted via Google Forms and distributed online through email and professional networks that had prosthetists' demographics, 3 main sections relevant to common guidelines regarding transtibial prosthetic alignment, and an open feedback question allowed respondents to give feedback on their current prosthetic alignment practices. Quantitative data analysis involved duplicate removal, categorizing responses into themes, and calculation of alignment scores, whereas associations of demographic data with engagement in prosthetic alignment were tested using χ2 tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed significant associations between higher education levels (P < 0.01) and monthly income (P < 0.01) in relation to average score of dynamic alignment practices. Despite the availability of advanced technology, 86.79% of prosthetists rely on traditional tools and qualitative methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights the need for standardized guidelines that incorporate personalized considerations to improve the quality and consistency of prosthetic alignment. These guidelines should address the diverse practices and preferences of prosthetists to enhance patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating transtibial prosthetic alignment practices: A cross-sectional study in Malaysia, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad S Malaheem, Nasrul Anuar Abd Razak, Noor Azuan Abu Osman\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prosthetic alignment is a critical factor in the functionality and comfort of transtibial prostheses, which are still based on amputee's feedback prosthetist experience and clinical judgment. Proper alignment involves a series of procedures, including bench, static, and dynamic alignment, each contributing to the overall success of the prosthesis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This cross-sectional study aims to explore transtibial prosthetic alignment practices among prosthetists in Malaysia, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, focusing on the associations of demographic data, occupational status, and knowledge on common prosthetic alignment guidelines.Study Design:A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey-based approach among experienced prosthetists was conducted via Google Forms and distributed online through email and professional networks that had prosthetists' demographics, 3 main sections relevant to common guidelines regarding transtibial prosthetic alignment, and an open feedback question allowed respondents to give feedback on their current prosthetic alignment practices. Quantitative data analysis involved duplicate removal, categorizing responses into themes, and calculation of alignment scores, whereas associations of demographic data with engagement in prosthetic alignment were tested using χ2 tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed significant associations between higher education levels (P < 0.01) and monthly income (P < 0.01) in relation to average score of dynamic alignment practices. Despite the availability of advanced technology, 86.79% of prosthetists rely on traditional tools and qualitative methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights the need for standardized guidelines that incorporate personalized considerations to improve the quality and consistency of prosthetic alignment. These guidelines should address the diverse practices and preferences of prosthetists to enhance patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prosthetics and Orthotics International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prosthetics and Orthotics International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000438\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000438","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:义肢的对准是决定义肢功能和舒适度的关键因素,而义肢的对准仍然是基于截肢者反馈的义肢专家经验和临床判断。正确的对准包括一系列的程序,包括长凳、静态和动态对准,每一个都有助于假体的整体成功。目的:本横断面研究旨在探讨马来西亚、约旦和沙特阿拉伯义肢医师的跨胫骨义肢对准实践,重点关注人口统计数据、职业状况和常见义肢对准指南知识之间的关联。研究设计:横断面研究。方法:通过谷歌表格对有经验的义肢医师进行调查,并通过电子邮件和专业网络在线分发,该表格包含义肢医师的人口统计资料、与跨胫骨义肢对准相关的3个主要部分,以及一个开放的反馈问题,允许受访者对他们目前的义肢对准实践进行反馈。定量数据分析包括重复删除、将响应分类为主题和计算对齐分数,而人口统计数据与参与假体对齐的关联使用χ2检验。结果:高等教育程度与月收入(P < 0.01)与动态对齐实践平均分呈显著相关(P < 0.01)。尽管有先进的技术,86.79%的义肢专家仍依赖传统的工具和定性方法。结论:该研究强调需要标准化的指南,包括个性化的考虑,以提高义肢对准的质量和一致性。这些指南应该针对不同的实践和义肢专家的偏好,以提高患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating transtibial prosthetic alignment practices: A cross-sectional study in Malaysia, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia.

Background: Prosthetic alignment is a critical factor in the functionality and comfort of transtibial prostheses, which are still based on amputee's feedback prosthetist experience and clinical judgment. Proper alignment involves a series of procedures, including bench, static, and dynamic alignment, each contributing to the overall success of the prosthesis.

Objective: This cross-sectional study aims to explore transtibial prosthetic alignment practices among prosthetists in Malaysia, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, focusing on the associations of demographic data, occupational status, and knowledge on common prosthetic alignment guidelines.Study Design:A cross-sectional study.

Methods: A survey-based approach among experienced prosthetists was conducted via Google Forms and distributed online through email and professional networks that had prosthetists' demographics, 3 main sections relevant to common guidelines regarding transtibial prosthetic alignment, and an open feedback question allowed respondents to give feedback on their current prosthetic alignment practices. Quantitative data analysis involved duplicate removal, categorizing responses into themes, and calculation of alignment scores, whereas associations of demographic data with engagement in prosthetic alignment were tested using χ2 tests.

Results: The findings revealed significant associations between higher education levels (P < 0.01) and monthly income (P < 0.01) in relation to average score of dynamic alignment practices. Despite the availability of advanced technology, 86.79% of prosthetists rely on traditional tools and qualitative methods.

Conclusions: The study highlights the need for standardized guidelines that incorporate personalized considerations to improve the quality and consistency of prosthetic alignment. These guidelines should address the diverse practices and preferences of prosthetists to enhance patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信