Wenling Jiang, Qian Zhou, Yan Ren, Haifeng Li, Zhiwu Huang
{"title":"中译本老年相关性听力损失患者听力自我效能感问卷及心理测量量表的编制。","authors":"Wenling Jiang, Qian Zhou, Yan Ren, Haifeng Li, Zhiwu Huang","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study developed and translated the Chinese version of the Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (C-LSEQ), tested its reliability and validity, and explored listening self-efficacy characteristics among older adults with age-related hearing loss (ARHL).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>One hundred seventy-two patients with ARHL aged ≥ 60 years completed the C-LSEQ by the direct interview method, as well as the pure-tone hearing threshold test, the speech recognition threshold test in noise, and the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Elderly-Screening. Using the random number table method, the C-LSEQ was resurveyed to 20 of the 172 study participants 2 weeks after the initial evaluation. The validity of C-LSEQ was further determined by comparing the scores of three groups: the young adults with normal-hearing group (<i>n</i> = 50), the older adults with normal-hearing group (<i>n</i> = 20), and the older adults with ARHL with no hearing aid use history. Analysis of variance and post hoc tests analyzed sex, education, and hearing loss's impact on listening self-efficacy in ARHL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(a) Reliability: The Cronbach's α coefficients were > .8, and the retest reliability was > 0.9 (<i>p</i> < .001). (b) Validity test: The composite reliability of the two subscales and the summary questionnaire were all > 0.7, and the average variance extracted was all > 0.5. The level of efficacy was higher with two normal-hearing groups compared to ARHL (<i>p</i> < .001). At a cutoff > 80, C-LSEQ distinguished ARHL from normal hearing with 100% sensitivity and 92.85% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The structure of the C-LSEQ was stable, with good reliability and validity, and it could be used to assess the listening self-efficacy of older adults.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.29954486.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":"34 3","pages":"722-733"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of the Chinese Version of the Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and Psychometric Evaluation for Older Adults With Age-Related Hearing Loss.\",\"authors\":\"Wenling Jiang, Qian Zhou, Yan Ren, Haifeng Li, Zhiwu Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study developed and translated the Chinese version of the Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (C-LSEQ), tested its reliability and validity, and explored listening self-efficacy characteristics among older adults with age-related hearing loss (ARHL).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>One hundred seventy-two patients with ARHL aged ≥ 60 years completed the C-LSEQ by the direct interview method, as well as the pure-tone hearing threshold test, the speech recognition threshold test in noise, and the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Elderly-Screening. Using the random number table method, the C-LSEQ was resurveyed to 20 of the 172 study participants 2 weeks after the initial evaluation. The validity of C-LSEQ was further determined by comparing the scores of three groups: the young adults with normal-hearing group (<i>n</i> = 50), the older adults with normal-hearing group (<i>n</i> = 20), and the older adults with ARHL with no hearing aid use history. Analysis of variance and post hoc tests analyzed sex, education, and hearing loss's impact on listening self-efficacy in ARHL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(a) Reliability: The Cronbach's α coefficients were > .8, and the retest reliability was > 0.9 (<i>p</i> < .001). (b) Validity test: The composite reliability of the two subscales and the summary questionnaire were all > 0.7, and the average variance extracted was all > 0.5. The level of efficacy was higher with two normal-hearing groups compared to ARHL (<i>p</i> < .001). At a cutoff > 80, C-LSEQ distinguished ARHL from normal hearing with 100% sensitivity and 92.85% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The structure of the C-LSEQ was stable, with good reliability and validity, and it could be used to assess the listening self-efficacy of older adults.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.29954486.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"722-733\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00033\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of the Chinese Version of the Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and Psychometric Evaluation for Older Adults With Age-Related Hearing Loss.
Purpose: This study developed and translated the Chinese version of the Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (C-LSEQ), tested its reliability and validity, and explored listening self-efficacy characteristics among older adults with age-related hearing loss (ARHL).
Method: One hundred seventy-two patients with ARHL aged ≥ 60 years completed the C-LSEQ by the direct interview method, as well as the pure-tone hearing threshold test, the speech recognition threshold test in noise, and the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Elderly-Screening. Using the random number table method, the C-LSEQ was resurveyed to 20 of the 172 study participants 2 weeks after the initial evaluation. The validity of C-LSEQ was further determined by comparing the scores of three groups: the young adults with normal-hearing group (n = 50), the older adults with normal-hearing group (n = 20), and the older adults with ARHL with no hearing aid use history. Analysis of variance and post hoc tests analyzed sex, education, and hearing loss's impact on listening self-efficacy in ARHL.
Results: (a) Reliability: The Cronbach's α coefficients were > .8, and the retest reliability was > 0.9 (p < .001). (b) Validity test: The composite reliability of the two subscales and the summary questionnaire were all > 0.7, and the average variance extracted was all > 0.5. The level of efficacy was higher with two normal-hearing groups compared to ARHL (p < .001). At a cutoff > 80, C-LSEQ distinguished ARHL from normal hearing with 100% sensitivity and 92.85% specificity.
Conclusion: The structure of the C-LSEQ was stable, with good reliability and validity, and it could be used to assess the listening self-efficacy of older adults.
期刊介绍：
Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
