预适应策略对腹腔镜袖胃切除术患者心理状态、糖代谢及术后预后的影响。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Yan Zhang, Bingquan Gao, Xiaocheng Zhang, Linru Zhao, Xu Han, Miaomiao Zhang, Guihua Zhang
{"title":"预适应策略对腹腔镜袖胃切除术患者心理状态、糖代谢及术后预后的影响。","authors":"Yan Zhang, Bingquan Gao, Xiaocheng Zhang, Linru Zhao, Xu Han, Miaomiao Zhang, Guihua Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-02973-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore the effects of prehabilitation strategies on the psychological state and glucose metabolism markers in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 eligible patients undergoing elective LSG between January 2024 and December 2024 were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned to either the control group or the observation group, with 60 patients in each group. The control group received routine care interventions, while the observation group received prehabilitation strategies. The outcomes were compared between the two groups, including body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage (PBF), visceral fat area (VFA), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), basal metabolic rate (BMR), glucose metabolism markers, psychological state, and incidence of postoperative complications, measured both one day before and six months after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One day before the intervention, there were no significant differences between the two groups in BMI, PBF, VFA, WHR, and BMR (P > 0.05). However, six months after the intervention, the observation group showed significantly lower BMI, PBF, VFA, WHR, and BMR compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, at six months post-surgery, the observation group had significantly lower HbA1c levels compared to the control group (P < 0.05), while the difference in fasting blood glucose (FBG) was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Regarding psychological state, the observation group showed significantly lower scores on the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) six months after the intervention (P < 0.05). Additionally, the incidence of postoperative minor complications was significantly lower in the observation group compared to the control group (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prehabilitation strategies can effectively improve the psychological state, reduce glycated hemoglobin levels, promote weight loss, and reduce the incidence of minor postoperative minor complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. These strategies appear to be safe and effective, and could be considered for wider clinical adoption.</p><p><strong>Clinical registration number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"394"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of prehabilitation strategies on psychological state, glucose metabolism, and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Yan Zhang, Bingquan Gao, Xiaocheng Zhang, Linru Zhao, Xu Han, Miaomiao Zhang, Guihua Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12893-025-02973-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore the effects of prehabilitation strategies on the psychological state and glucose metabolism markers in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 eligible patients undergoing elective LSG between January 2024 and December 2024 were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned to either the control group or the observation group, with 60 patients in each group. The control group received routine care interventions, while the observation group received prehabilitation strategies. The outcomes were compared between the two groups, including body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage (PBF), visceral fat area (VFA), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), basal metabolic rate (BMR), glucose metabolism markers, psychological state, and incidence of postoperative complications, measured both one day before and six months after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One day before the intervention, there were no significant differences between the two groups in BMI, PBF, VFA, WHR, and BMR (P > 0.05). However, six months after the intervention, the observation group showed significantly lower BMI, PBF, VFA, WHR, and BMR compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, at six months post-surgery, the observation group had significantly lower HbA1c levels compared to the control group (P < 0.05), while the difference in fasting blood glucose (FBG) was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Regarding psychological state, the observation group showed significantly lower scores on the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) six months after the intervention (P < 0.05). Additionally, the incidence of postoperative minor complications was significantly lower in the observation group compared to the control group (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prehabilitation strategies can effectively improve the psychological state, reduce glycated hemoglobin levels, promote weight loss, and reduce the incidence of minor postoperative minor complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. These strategies appear to be safe and effective, and could be considered for wider clinical adoption.</p><p><strong>Clinical registration number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379387/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02973-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02973-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨康复策略对腹腔镜袖胃切除术(LSG)患者心理状态及糖代谢指标的影响。方法:在2024年1月至2024年12月期间,共有120名符合条件的患者接受了选择性LSG。他们被随机分为对照组和观察组,每组60名患者。对照组采用常规护理干预,观察组采用康复策略。比较两组患者干预前1天和干预后6个月的体重指数(BMI)、体脂率(PBF)、内脏脂肪面积(VFA)、腰臀比(WHR)、基础代谢率(BMR)、糖代谢指标、心理状态和术后并发症发生率。结果:干预前1天,两组患者BMI、PBF、VFA、WHR、BMR比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。干预6个月后,观察组BMI、PBF、VFA、WHR、BMR均明显低于对照组(P < 0.05)。心理状态方面,观察组干预6个月后焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)得分均显著降低(P)。结论:预康复策略可有效改善腹腔镜胃袖切除术患者的心理状态,降低糖化血红蛋白水平,促进体重减轻,减少术后轻微并发症的发生率。这些策略似乎是安全有效的,可以考虑在更广泛的临床应用。临床注册号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The impact of prehabilitation strategies on psychological state, glucose metabolism, and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

The impact of prehabilitation strategies on psychological state, glucose metabolism, and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Objective: This study aims to explore the effects of prehabilitation strategies on the psychological state and glucose metabolism markers in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

Methods: A total of 120 eligible patients undergoing elective LSG between January 2024 and December 2024 were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned to either the control group or the observation group, with 60 patients in each group. The control group received routine care interventions, while the observation group received prehabilitation strategies. The outcomes were compared between the two groups, including body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage (PBF), visceral fat area (VFA), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), basal metabolic rate (BMR), glucose metabolism markers, psychological state, and incidence of postoperative complications, measured both one day before and six months after the intervention.

Results: One day before the intervention, there were no significant differences between the two groups in BMI, PBF, VFA, WHR, and BMR (P > 0.05). However, six months after the intervention, the observation group showed significantly lower BMI, PBF, VFA, WHR, and BMR compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, at six months post-surgery, the observation group had significantly lower HbA1c levels compared to the control group (P < 0.05), while the difference in fasting blood glucose (FBG) was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Regarding psychological state, the observation group showed significantly lower scores on the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) six months after the intervention (P < 0.05). Additionally, the incidence of postoperative minor complications was significantly lower in the observation group compared to the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Prehabilitation strategies can effectively improve the psychological state, reduce glycated hemoglobin levels, promote weight loss, and reduce the incidence of minor postoperative minor complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. These strategies appear to be safe and effective, and could be considered for wider clinical adoption.

Clinical registration number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信