黑山临床中心限制抗生素使用。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
the Indian Journal of Pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-22 DOI:10.4103/ijp.ijp_947_24
Dzana Lukac, Tanja Vojinovic, Pinaki Dutta, Hasib Lukac, Sanja Medenica, Arshiya Dutta, Mitar Delevic, Sanela Abazovic Hot, Dzihan Abazovic, Jovana Vukovic, Branislava Miljkovic
{"title":"黑山临床中心限制抗生素使用。","authors":"Dzana Lukac, Tanja Vojinovic, Pinaki Dutta, Hasib Lukac, Sanja Medenica, Arshiya Dutta, Mitar Delevic, Sanela Abazovic Hot, Dzihan Abazovic, Jovana Vukovic, Branislava Miljkovic","doi":"10.4103/ijp.ijp_947_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this century, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) presents a major public health problem, because it is a leading cause of death worldwide. Antimicrobial resistance is caused by the overprescription of antibiotics as well as self-medication. In 2010, antibiotics were the most commonly prescribed medications according to the Montenegrin Institute of Public Health. To reduce side effects, improve treatment efficacy, and prevent AMR, it is necessary to have greater control and help formulating national and international level policies over antibiotic prescription and their use.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This research focuses on the analysis of requests for the dispensing of reserve antibiotics and the justification of their prescription and use.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In the Clinical Center of Montenegro, 174 requests for restricted antibiotics were retrospectively analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analysis of 174 requests for restricted antibiotics determined that an antibiogram has been performed in only 21.84% of cases, which means that there were 78.16% of cases of empirical antibiotic use. In 72.25% of cases, restricted antibiotics were included in therapy without prior use of unrestricted antimicrobial therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on data analytics, it can be concluded that using restricted antibiotics in therapy is not completely in line with rational antibiotics implementation. Restricted antibiotics are used without culture sensitivity tests in more than 2/3rd of cases. Similarly, restricted antibiotics were used as first-line therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49189,"journal":{"name":"the Indian Journal of Pharmacy","volume":"57 5","pages":"338-343"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restricted antibiotic use in the clinical center of montenegro.\",\"authors\":\"Dzana Lukac, Tanja Vojinovic, Pinaki Dutta, Hasib Lukac, Sanja Medenica, Arshiya Dutta, Mitar Delevic, Sanela Abazovic Hot, Dzihan Abazovic, Jovana Vukovic, Branislava Miljkovic\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijp.ijp_947_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this century, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) presents a major public health problem, because it is a leading cause of death worldwide. Antimicrobial resistance is caused by the overprescription of antibiotics as well as self-medication. In 2010, antibiotics were the most commonly prescribed medications according to the Montenegrin Institute of Public Health. To reduce side effects, improve treatment efficacy, and prevent AMR, it is necessary to have greater control and help formulating national and international level policies over antibiotic prescription and their use.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This research focuses on the analysis of requests for the dispensing of reserve antibiotics and the justification of their prescription and use.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In the Clinical Center of Montenegro, 174 requests for restricted antibiotics were retrospectively analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analysis of 174 requests for restricted antibiotics determined that an antibiogram has been performed in only 21.84% of cases, which means that there were 78.16% of cases of empirical antibiotic use. In 72.25% of cases, restricted antibiotics were included in therapy without prior use of unrestricted antimicrobial therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on data analytics, it can be concluded that using restricted antibiotics in therapy is not completely in line with rational antibiotics implementation. Restricted antibiotics are used without culture sensitivity tests in more than 2/3rd of cases. Similarly, restricted antibiotics were used as first-line therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"the Indian Journal of Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"57 5\",\"pages\":\"338-343\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419576/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"the Indian Journal of Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijp.ijp_947_24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"the Indian Journal of Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijp.ijp_947_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在本世纪,抗菌素耐药性(AMR)是一个重大的公共卫生问题,因为它是世界范围内死亡的主要原因。抗菌素耐药性是由抗生素的过度处方以及自我用药引起的。根据黑山公共卫生研究所的数据,2010年抗生素是最常用的处方药。为了减少副作用,提高治疗效果,预防抗生素耐药性,有必要加强控制,并帮助制定国家和国际层面的抗生素处方和使用政策。目的:对我院储备抗生素调剂申请及处方、使用理由进行分析。材料与方法:对黑山临床中心174例限用抗菌药物申请进行回顾性分析。结果:对174例限用抗生素申请进行数据分析,仅21.84%的病例进行了抗生素摄影,即78.16%的病例是经验性使用抗生素。在72.25%的病例中,限制性抗生素被纳入治疗,此前未使用无限制抗菌药物治疗。结论:根据数据分析,在治疗中使用限制性抗生素并不完全符合合理使用抗生素的要求。超过2/3的病例在没有进行培养敏感性试验的情况下使用限制性抗生素。同样,限制性抗生素作为一线治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Restricted antibiotic use in the clinical center of montenegro.

Background: In this century, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) presents a major public health problem, because it is a leading cause of death worldwide. Antimicrobial resistance is caused by the overprescription of antibiotics as well as self-medication. In 2010, antibiotics were the most commonly prescribed medications according to the Montenegrin Institute of Public Health. To reduce side effects, improve treatment efficacy, and prevent AMR, it is necessary to have greater control and help formulating national and international level policies over antibiotic prescription and their use.

Aims: This research focuses on the analysis of requests for the dispensing of reserve antibiotics and the justification of their prescription and use.

Materials and methods: In the Clinical Center of Montenegro, 174 requests for restricted antibiotics were retrospectively analyzed.

Results: Data analysis of 174 requests for restricted antibiotics determined that an antibiogram has been performed in only 21.84% of cases, which means that there were 78.16% of cases of empirical antibiotic use. In 72.25% of cases, restricted antibiotics were included in therapy without prior use of unrestricted antimicrobial therapy.

Conclusions: Based on data analytics, it can be concluded that using restricted antibiotics in therapy is not completely in line with rational antibiotics implementation. Restricted antibiotics are used without culture sensitivity tests in more than 2/3rd of cases. Similarly, restricted antibiotics were used as first-line therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
the Indian Journal of Pharmacy
the Indian Journal of Pharmacy Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Pharmacology accepts, in English, review articles, articles for educational forum, original research articles (full length and short communications), letter to editor, case reports and interesting fillers. Articles concerning all aspects of pharmacology will be considered. Articles of general interest (e.g. methods, therapeutics, medical education, interesting websites, new drug information and commentary on a recent topic) are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信