直接到混合ct血管套件(Nexaris)减少中风血栓切除术(Direct- st)的治疗时间:一项前瞻性模拟研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Daryl Goldman, Henri Kolb, Kevin Buttet, Aliya Siddiqui, Devin Bageac, Matthew Bai, Tara Roche, Justin Tay, Xinyan Liu, J Mocco, Reade De Leacy
{"title":"直接到混合ct血管套件(Nexaris)减少中风血栓切除术(Direct- st)的治疗时间:一项前瞻性模拟研究。","authors":"Daryl Goldman, Henri Kolb, Kevin Buttet, Aliya Siddiqui, Devin Bageac, Matthew Bai, Tara Roche, Justin Tay, Xinyan Liu, J Mocco, Reade De Leacy","doi":"10.1177/15910199251369153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundRapid thrombectomy initiation is critical for improving outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). Direct transport to an angiography suite (DTAS), bypassing standard Emergency Department CT imaging, Direct to ED CT (DTCT), reduces door-to-puncture times. This study compares standard DTCT and expedited DTAS workflows using a hybrid multidetector CT (MDCT)-angiography suite.Materials and methodsThis single-center, prospective, blinded analysis study simulated AIS care using a medical mannequin. Twelve simulations were conducted (six per protocol): (a) Standard DTCT and (b) Direct DTAS. Simulations included ED arrival, triage, clinical assessment, imaging, and groin puncture. All mock patients had LVO and were thrombectomy candidates (S-LAMS ≥ 4) with contraindications to lysis. Time metrics were measured and compared.ResultsMean door-to-puncture time was significantly shorter in the DTAS group (DTCT: 39.83 [4.36] min vs DTAS: 22.17 [2.4] min (<i>P</i> < .0001). Door-to-CT start times were similar (DTCT: 19.5 [7.15] vs DTAS: 15.0 [2.97]; <i>P</i> = .1848). CT-to-puncture time was shorter with DTAS (DTCT: 20.33 [5.01] vs DTAS: 7.17 [1.47]; <i>P</i> = .0009). CT-complete to puncture time favored DTAS (DTCT: 12.33 [3.93] vs DTAS: 2.33 [1.03]; <i>P</i> = .0011). Mean time from CT completion to Angio suite arrival in DTCT was 6.67 min.ConclusionA direct-to-CT-Angio (DTAS) workflow using MDCT technology significantly reduces door-to-puncture times compared to standard DTCT, improving hospital workflow for LVO stroke patients. Further clinical studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251369153"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380727/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct to hybrid CT-angiosuite (Nexaris) reduces treatment time for stroke thrombectomy (Direct-ST): A prospective simulation study.\",\"authors\":\"Daryl Goldman, Henri Kolb, Kevin Buttet, Aliya Siddiqui, Devin Bageac, Matthew Bai, Tara Roche, Justin Tay, Xinyan Liu, J Mocco, Reade De Leacy\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199251369153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundRapid thrombectomy initiation is critical for improving outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). Direct transport to an angiography suite (DTAS), bypassing standard Emergency Department CT imaging, Direct to ED CT (DTCT), reduces door-to-puncture times. This study compares standard DTCT and expedited DTAS workflows using a hybrid multidetector CT (MDCT)-angiography suite.Materials and methodsThis single-center, prospective, blinded analysis study simulated AIS care using a medical mannequin. Twelve simulations were conducted (six per protocol): (a) Standard DTCT and (b) Direct DTAS. Simulations included ED arrival, triage, clinical assessment, imaging, and groin puncture. All mock patients had LVO and were thrombectomy candidates (S-LAMS ≥ 4) with contraindications to lysis. Time metrics were measured and compared.ResultsMean door-to-puncture time was significantly shorter in the DTAS group (DTCT: 39.83 [4.36] min vs DTAS: 22.17 [2.4] min (<i>P</i> < .0001). Door-to-CT start times were similar (DTCT: 19.5 [7.15] vs DTAS: 15.0 [2.97]; <i>P</i> = .1848). CT-to-puncture time was shorter with DTAS (DTCT: 20.33 [5.01] vs DTAS: 7.17 [1.47]; <i>P</i> = .0009). CT-complete to puncture time favored DTAS (DTCT: 12.33 [3.93] vs DTAS: 2.33 [1.03]; <i>P</i> = .0011). Mean time from CT completion to Angio suite arrival in DTCT was 6.67 min.ConclusionA direct-to-CT-Angio (DTAS) workflow using MDCT technology significantly reduces door-to-puncture times compared to standard DTCT, improving hospital workflow for LVO stroke patients. Further clinical studies are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15910199251369153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380727/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251369153\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251369153","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:快速取栓对于改善大血管闭塞(LVO)引起的急性缺血性卒中(AIS)的预后至关重要。直接运送到血管造影套件(DTAS),绕过标准的急诊科CT成像,直接到ED CT (DTCT),减少门到穿刺时间。本研究比较了使用混合多检测器CT (MDCT)-血管造影套件的标准DTCT和加速DTAS工作流程。材料和方法本研究采用单中心、前瞻性、盲法分析,使用人体模型模拟AIS护理。进行了12次模拟(每个方案6次):(a)标准dct和(b)直接DTAS。模拟包括急诊科到达、分诊、临床评估、成像和腹股沟穿刺。所有模拟患者均有LVO,并且是血栓切除术候选患者(S-LAMS≥4),有溶栓禁忌症。测量和比较时间指标。结果DTAS组平均开门至穿刺时间明显缩短(DTCT: 39.83 [4.36] min vs DTAS: 22.17 [2.4] min (P = 0.1848)。DTAS组ct至穿刺时间更短(DTCT: 20.33 [5.01] vs DTAS: 7.17 [1.47]; P = 0.0009)。ct完成到穿刺时间对DTAS有利(DTCT: 12.33 [3.93] vs DTAS: 2.33 [1.03]; P = 0.0011)。从CT完井到到达血管套房的平均时间为6.67分钟。结论与标准DTCT相比,使用MDCT技术的直接到ct血管成像(DTAS)工作流程显著减少了进门到穿刺时间,改善了左心室卒中患者的医院工作流程。需要进一步的临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Direct to hybrid CT-angiosuite (Nexaris) reduces treatment time for stroke thrombectomy (Direct-ST): A prospective simulation study.

BackgroundRapid thrombectomy initiation is critical for improving outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). Direct transport to an angiography suite (DTAS), bypassing standard Emergency Department CT imaging, Direct to ED CT (DTCT), reduces door-to-puncture times. This study compares standard DTCT and expedited DTAS workflows using a hybrid multidetector CT (MDCT)-angiography suite.Materials and methodsThis single-center, prospective, blinded analysis study simulated AIS care using a medical mannequin. Twelve simulations were conducted (six per protocol): (a) Standard DTCT and (b) Direct DTAS. Simulations included ED arrival, triage, clinical assessment, imaging, and groin puncture. All mock patients had LVO and were thrombectomy candidates (S-LAMS ≥ 4) with contraindications to lysis. Time metrics were measured and compared.ResultsMean door-to-puncture time was significantly shorter in the DTAS group (DTCT: 39.83 [4.36] min vs DTAS: 22.17 [2.4] min (P < .0001). Door-to-CT start times were similar (DTCT: 19.5 [7.15] vs DTAS: 15.0 [2.97]; P = .1848). CT-to-puncture time was shorter with DTAS (DTCT: 20.33 [5.01] vs DTAS: 7.17 [1.47]; P = .0009). CT-complete to puncture time favored DTAS (DTCT: 12.33 [3.93] vs DTAS: 2.33 [1.03]; P = .0011). Mean time from CT completion to Angio suite arrival in DTCT was 6.67 min.ConclusionA direct-to-CT-Angio (DTAS) workflow using MDCT technology significantly reduces door-to-puncture times compared to standard DTCT, improving hospital workflow for LVO stroke patients. Further clinical studies are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信