单腿下降和跳跃:洞察多段足部运动学,动力学和视觉焦点在健康年轻成年男性中的作用。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Nicolas Haelewijn, Filip Staes, Evie Vereecke, Stijn Rosseel, Kevin Deschamps
{"title":"单腿下降和跳跃:洞察多段足部运动学,动力学和视觉焦点在健康年轻成年男性中的作用。","authors":"Nicolas Haelewijn, Filip Staes, Evie Vereecke, Stijn Rosseel, Kevin Deschamps","doi":"10.1002/jfa2.70078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Understanding foot joint loading during different dynamic activities is essential information for guiding exercise progression in rehabilitation. While walking and running biomechanics are well studied, joint-specific kinetic data during a single leg drop and hop task, often used in rehabilitation, are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate (1) the kinetic behavior of the ankle, Chopart, Lisfranc, and MTP-1 joints during a drop-hop task under different visual constraints and (2) to contextualize these findings by comparing them with heel-strike running, to assess the relative loading demands of the drop-hop task.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen recreationally active male adults performed a single-leg drop and hop under two visual focus conditions: central (focusing on the landing spot) and peripheral (focusing straight ahead). Kinematics, moments, and power were analyzed using a four-segment foot model with statistical parametric mapping. Additionally, peak plantarflexion moments and power outputs were compared with existing data from heel-strike running data from a mixed-sex sample (4 males, 3 females) collected in a separate study using the same setup.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings revealed no differences between central and peripheral focus conditions. Heel-strike running shows similar joint loading, but higher power generation (p < 0.001) at the ankle and Chopart joint, higher absorption (p < 0.001) at the Chopart and MTP-1 (p < 0.05) joint and lower power absorption (p < 0.001) at the ankle and Lisfranc joint.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Visual input does not influence foot biomechanics during a single-leg drop and hop. This task produces similar joint loading patterns similar to heel-strike running but with reduced power generation at the ankle and midfoot. Contrary to global belief, the single leg drop-hop task is not excessively more demanding in terms of foot joint loading, supporting the earlier use of drop-hop exercises in rehabilitation programs. They offer a controlled way to reintroduce loading while avoiding the full propulsion demands of running, independent of visual focus.</p>","PeriodicalId":49164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","volume":"18 3","pages":"e70078"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12401937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single Leg Drop and Hop: Insight Into Multisegment Foot Kinematics, Kinetics and the Role of Visual Focus in Healthy Young Adult Males.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Haelewijn, Filip Staes, Evie Vereecke, Stijn Rosseel, Kevin Deschamps\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jfa2.70078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Understanding foot joint loading during different dynamic activities is essential information for guiding exercise progression in rehabilitation. While walking and running biomechanics are well studied, joint-specific kinetic data during a single leg drop and hop task, often used in rehabilitation, are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate (1) the kinetic behavior of the ankle, Chopart, Lisfranc, and MTP-1 joints during a drop-hop task under different visual constraints and (2) to contextualize these findings by comparing them with heel-strike running, to assess the relative loading demands of the drop-hop task.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen recreationally active male adults performed a single-leg drop and hop under two visual focus conditions: central (focusing on the landing spot) and peripheral (focusing straight ahead). Kinematics, moments, and power were analyzed using a four-segment foot model with statistical parametric mapping. Additionally, peak plantarflexion moments and power outputs were compared with existing data from heel-strike running data from a mixed-sex sample (4 males, 3 females) collected in a separate study using the same setup.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings revealed no differences between central and peripheral focus conditions. Heel-strike running shows similar joint loading, but higher power generation (p < 0.001) at the ankle and Chopart joint, higher absorption (p < 0.001) at the Chopart and MTP-1 (p < 0.05) joint and lower power absorption (p < 0.001) at the ankle and Lisfranc joint.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Visual input does not influence foot biomechanics during a single-leg drop and hop. This task produces similar joint loading patterns similar to heel-strike running but with reduced power generation at the ankle and midfoot. Contrary to global belief, the single leg drop-hop task is not excessively more demanding in terms of foot joint loading, supporting the earlier use of drop-hop exercises in rehabilitation programs. They offer a controlled way to reintroduce loading while avoiding the full propulsion demands of running, independent of visual focus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"e70078\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12401937/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70078\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70078","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:了解不同动态活动期间足关节负荷是指导康复运动进展的重要信息。虽然步行和跑步的生物力学已经得到了很好的研究,但在单腿下降和跳跃任务中,通常用于康复的关节特异性动力学数据却缺乏。本研究旨在评估(1)在不同视觉限制下,踝关节、Chopart关节、Lisfranc关节和MTP-1关节在落体跳任务中的动力学行为;(2)通过将这些结果与脚跟撞击跑步进行比较,来评估落体跳任务的相对负荷需求。方法:17名娱乐性活动男性成人在中央(聚焦着陆点)和周围(聚焦正前方)两种视觉聚焦条件下进行单腿下降和跳跃。运动学,力矩和功率分析使用四段足模型与统计参数映射。此外,将峰值跖屈力矩和功率输出与现有数据进行比较,这些数据来自于一个使用相同设置的混合性别样本(4名男性,3名女性)的脚跟撞击跑步数据。结果:研究结果显示中央和周围焦点状况无差异。脚后跟撞击跑步表现出类似的关节负荷,但产生的能量更高(p)。结论:视觉输入不影响单腿起跳时的足部生物力学。这项任务产生类似的关节负荷模式,类似于脚跟撞击跑步,但踝关节和足中部产生的能量减少。与人们普遍认为的相反,单腿落地跳任务对足关节负荷的要求并不高,这支持了早期在康复项目中使用落地跳练习。它们提供了一种受控的方式来重新引入负载,同时避免了运行时的全部推进需求,独立于视觉焦点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Single Leg Drop and Hop: Insight Into Multisegment Foot Kinematics, Kinetics and the Role of Visual Focus in Healthy Young Adult Males.

Single Leg Drop and Hop: Insight Into Multisegment Foot Kinematics, Kinetics and the Role of Visual Focus in Healthy Young Adult Males.

Single Leg Drop and Hop: Insight Into Multisegment Foot Kinematics, Kinetics and the Role of Visual Focus in Healthy Young Adult Males.

Single Leg Drop and Hop: Insight Into Multisegment Foot Kinematics, Kinetics and the Role of Visual Focus in Healthy Young Adult Males.

Introduction: Understanding foot joint loading during different dynamic activities is essential information for guiding exercise progression in rehabilitation. While walking and running biomechanics are well studied, joint-specific kinetic data during a single leg drop and hop task, often used in rehabilitation, are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate (1) the kinetic behavior of the ankle, Chopart, Lisfranc, and MTP-1 joints during a drop-hop task under different visual constraints and (2) to contextualize these findings by comparing them with heel-strike running, to assess the relative loading demands of the drop-hop task.

Methods: Seventeen recreationally active male adults performed a single-leg drop and hop under two visual focus conditions: central (focusing on the landing spot) and peripheral (focusing straight ahead). Kinematics, moments, and power were analyzed using a four-segment foot model with statistical parametric mapping. Additionally, peak plantarflexion moments and power outputs were compared with existing data from heel-strike running data from a mixed-sex sample (4 males, 3 females) collected in a separate study using the same setup.

Results: Findings revealed no differences between central and peripheral focus conditions. Heel-strike running shows similar joint loading, but higher power generation (p < 0.001) at the ankle and Chopart joint, higher absorption (p < 0.001) at the Chopart and MTP-1 (p < 0.05) joint and lower power absorption (p < 0.001) at the ankle and Lisfranc joint.

Conclusion: Visual input does not influence foot biomechanics during a single-leg drop and hop. This task produces similar joint loading patterns similar to heel-strike running but with reduced power generation at the ankle and midfoot. Contrary to global belief, the single leg drop-hop task is not excessively more demanding in terms of foot joint loading, supporting the earlier use of drop-hop exercises in rehabilitation programs. They offer a controlled way to reintroduce loading while avoiding the full propulsion demands of running, independent of visual focus.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, the official journal of the Australian Podiatry Association and The College of Podiatry (UK), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of policy, organisation, delivery and clinical practice related to the assessment, diagnosis, prevention and management of foot and ankle disorders. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research covers a wide range of clinical subject areas, including diabetology, paediatrics, sports medicine, gerontology and geriatrics, foot surgery, physical therapy, dermatology, wound management, radiology, biomechanics and bioengineering, orthotics and prosthetics, as well the broad areas of epidemiology, policy, organisation and delivery of services related to foot and ankle care. The journal encourages submissions from all health professionals who manage lower limb conditions, including podiatrists, nurses, physical therapists and physiotherapists, orthopaedists, manual therapists, medical specialists and general medical practitioners, as well as health service researchers concerned with foot and ankle care. The Australian Podiatry Association and the College of Podiatry (UK) have reserve funds to cover the article-processing charge for manuscripts submitted by its members. Society members can email the appropriate contact at Australian Podiatry Association or The College of Podiatry to obtain the corresponding code to enter on submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信