Safia S Jiwani, Assanatou Bamogo, Elizabeth A Hazel, Abdoulaye Maiga, Emily B Wilson, Gouda Roland Mesmer Mady, Agbessi Amouzou
{"title":"新生儿产后护理的有效覆盖:利用住户调查数据评估32个低收入和中等收入国家的服务接触内容差距。","authors":"Safia S Jiwani, Assanatou Bamogo, Elizabeth A Hazel, Abdoulaye Maiga, Emily B Wilson, Gouda Roland Mesmer Mady, Agbessi Amouzou","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-quality postnatal care (PNC) is essential for newborn survival. However, newborn PNC coverage indicators do not reflect the quality of care received. We estimated effective coverage of newborn PNC by incorporating content of care and calculated the contact-content gap in 32 low-and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using household survey data from 32 LMICs, we defined effective coverage of newborn PNC as the proportion of mothers or babies who received five essential signal functions as part of their newborn's PNC check by a medically trained provider within the first two days of birth. We calculated the contact-content gap as the absolute difference between service coverage of newborn PNC and effective coverage of newborn PNC, in percentage points (pp). We described inequalities in effective coverage of newborn PNC by mother's age, parity, wealth, education, residence, antenatal care seeking, delivery facility type, and managing authority.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median effective coverage of newborn PNC was 27.5% across countries, ranging from 2.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.6, 2.7) in Burundi to 78.3% (95% CI = 74.3, 81.8) in Armenia. We identified large PNC contact-content gaps, up to 52.6 pp in The Gambia. Content of care was generally poor, with only 37.1% of mothers across countries receiving counselling on newborn danger signs. We found important demographic, socioeconomic, and health systems inequalities in newborn PNC effective coverage, disproportionately favouring newborns whose mother was older (35-49 years), primiparous, lived in urban areas, belonged to the wealthiest households, had at least secondary education, and delivered in a hospital or the private sector in most countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In most countries, a substantial number of newborns who are checked during PNC do not receive all basic services. Effective coverage measures offer a more comprehensive estimate for assessing service gaps, driving action, and ensuring health gains. Addressing the missed opportunities of inadequate care content and focussing on equity will be critical to improve survival of all mothers and newborns.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04219"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective coverage of newborn postnatal care: assessing the service contact-content gap in 32 low- and middle-income countries using household survey data.\",\"authors\":\"Safia S Jiwani, Assanatou Bamogo, Elizabeth A Hazel, Abdoulaye Maiga, Emily B Wilson, Gouda Roland Mesmer Mady, Agbessi Amouzou\",\"doi\":\"10.7189/jogh.15.04219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-quality postnatal care (PNC) is essential for newborn survival. However, newborn PNC coverage indicators do not reflect the quality of care received. We estimated effective coverage of newborn PNC by incorporating content of care and calculated the contact-content gap in 32 low-and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using household survey data from 32 LMICs, we defined effective coverage of newborn PNC as the proportion of mothers or babies who received five essential signal functions as part of their newborn's PNC check by a medically trained provider within the first two days of birth. We calculated the contact-content gap as the absolute difference between service coverage of newborn PNC and effective coverage of newborn PNC, in percentage points (pp). We described inequalities in effective coverage of newborn PNC by mother's age, parity, wealth, education, residence, antenatal care seeking, delivery facility type, and managing authority.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median effective coverage of newborn PNC was 27.5% across countries, ranging from 2.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.6, 2.7) in Burundi to 78.3% (95% CI = 74.3, 81.8) in Armenia. We identified large PNC contact-content gaps, up to 52.6 pp in The Gambia. Content of care was generally poor, with only 37.1% of mothers across countries receiving counselling on newborn danger signs. We found important demographic, socioeconomic, and health systems inequalities in newborn PNC effective coverage, disproportionately favouring newborns whose mother was older (35-49 years), primiparous, lived in urban areas, belonged to the wealthiest households, had at least secondary education, and delivered in a hospital or the private sector in most countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In most countries, a substantial number of newborns who are checked during PNC do not receive all basic services. Effective coverage measures offer a more comprehensive estimate for assessing service gaps, driving action, and ensuring health gains. Addressing the missed opportunities of inadequate care content and focussing on equity will be critical to improve survival of all mothers and newborns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"04219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404218/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04219\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04219","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:高质量的产后护理(PNC)对新生儿的生存至关重要。然而,新生儿PNC覆盖率指标并不能反映所接受护理的质量。我们通过纳入护理内容来估计新生儿PNC的有效覆盖率,并计算了32个低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的接触-内容差距。方法:使用来自32个低收入国家的家庭调查数据,我们将新生儿PNC的有效覆盖率定义为母亲或婴儿在出生头两天内接受五种基本信号功能作为新生儿PNC检查的一部分的比例。我们计算了新生儿PNC服务覆盖率与新生儿PNC有效覆盖率之间的绝对差异,以百分点(pp)为单位。我们描述了新生儿PNC有效覆盖的不平等,包括母亲的年龄、平等、财富、教育、居住地、产前护理寻求、分娩设施类型和管理权限。结果:各国新生儿PNC的有效覆盖率中位数为27.5%,范围从布隆迪的2.1%(95%置信区间(CI) = 1.6, 2.7)到亚美尼亚的78.3% (95% CI = 74.3, 81.8)。我们发现了较大的PNC接触-内容差距,在冈比亚高达52.6 pp。护理的内容普遍较差,各国只有37.1%的母亲接受有关新生儿危险迹象的咨询。我们发现新生儿PNC有效覆盖方面存在重要的人口统计学、社会经济和卫生系统不平等,在大多数国家,母亲年龄较大(35-49岁)、初产、居住在城市地区、属于最富裕家庭、至少受过中等教育、在医院或私营部门分娩的新生儿不成比例地受益。结论:在大多数国家,在PNC期间接受检查的大量新生儿没有得到所有基本服务。有效的覆盖措施为评估服务差距、推动行动和确保健康收益提供了更全面的估计。解决因护理内容不足而错失的机会并注重公平,对于改善所有母亲和新生儿的生存至关重要。
Effective coverage of newborn postnatal care: assessing the service contact-content gap in 32 low- and middle-income countries using household survey data.
Background: High-quality postnatal care (PNC) is essential for newborn survival. However, newborn PNC coverage indicators do not reflect the quality of care received. We estimated effective coverage of newborn PNC by incorporating content of care and calculated the contact-content gap in 32 low-and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Methods: Using household survey data from 32 LMICs, we defined effective coverage of newborn PNC as the proportion of mothers or babies who received five essential signal functions as part of their newborn's PNC check by a medically trained provider within the first two days of birth. We calculated the contact-content gap as the absolute difference between service coverage of newborn PNC and effective coverage of newborn PNC, in percentage points (pp). We described inequalities in effective coverage of newborn PNC by mother's age, parity, wealth, education, residence, antenatal care seeking, delivery facility type, and managing authority.
Results: The median effective coverage of newborn PNC was 27.5% across countries, ranging from 2.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.6, 2.7) in Burundi to 78.3% (95% CI = 74.3, 81.8) in Armenia. We identified large PNC contact-content gaps, up to 52.6 pp in The Gambia. Content of care was generally poor, with only 37.1% of mothers across countries receiving counselling on newborn danger signs. We found important demographic, socioeconomic, and health systems inequalities in newborn PNC effective coverage, disproportionately favouring newborns whose mother was older (35-49 years), primiparous, lived in urban areas, belonged to the wealthiest households, had at least secondary education, and delivered in a hospital or the private sector in most countries.
Conclusions: In most countries, a substantial number of newborns who are checked during PNC do not receive all basic services. Effective coverage measures offer a more comprehensive estimate for assessing service gaps, driving action, and ensuring health gains. Addressing the missed opportunities of inadequate care content and focussing on equity will be critical to improve survival of all mothers and newborns.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.