用助听器对录制音乐的感知:压缩差异影响音乐场景分析和音乐音质。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Trends in Hearing Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-25 DOI:10.1177/23312165251368669
Robin Hake, Michel Bürgel, Christophe Lesimple, Matthias Vormann, Kirsten C Wagener, Volker Kuehnel, Kai Siedenburg
{"title":"用助听器对录制音乐的感知:压缩差异影响音乐场景分析和音乐音质。","authors":"Robin Hake, Michel Bürgel, Christophe Lesimple, Matthias Vormann, Kirsten C Wagener, Volker Kuehnel, Kai Siedenburg","doi":"10.1177/23312165251368669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hearing aids have traditionally been designed to facilitate speech perception. With regards to music perception, previous work indicates that hearing aid users frequently complain about music sound quality. Yet, the effects of hearing aid amplification on musical perception abilities are largely unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effects of hearing aid amplification and dynamic range compression (DRC) settings on musical scene analysis (MSA) abilities and sound quality ratings (SQR) using polyphonic music recordings. Additionally, speech reception thresholds in noise (SRT) were measured. Thirty-three hearing aid users with moderate to severe hearing loss participated in three conditions: unaided, and aided with either slow or fast DRC settings. Overall, MSA abilities, SQR and SRT significantly improved with the use of hearing aids compared to the unaided condition. Yet, differences were observed regarding the choice of compression settings. Fast DRC led to better MSA performance, reflecting enhanced selective listening in musical mixtures, while slow DRC elicited more favorable SQR. Despite these improvements, variability in amplification benefit across DRC settings and tasks remained considerable, with some individuals showing limited or no improvement. These findings highlight a trade-off between scene transparency (indexed by MSA) and perceived sound quality, with individual differences emerging as a key factor in shaping amplification outcomes. Our results underscore the potential benefits of hearing aids for music perception and indicate the need for personalized fitting strategies tailored to task-specific demands.</p>","PeriodicalId":48678,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Hearing","volume":"29 ","pages":"23312165251368669"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perception of Recorded Music With Hearing Aids: Compression Differentially Affects Musical Scene Analysis and Musical Sound Quality.\",\"authors\":\"Robin Hake, Michel Bürgel, Christophe Lesimple, Matthias Vormann, Kirsten C Wagener, Volker Kuehnel, Kai Siedenburg\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23312165251368669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hearing aids have traditionally been designed to facilitate speech perception. With regards to music perception, previous work indicates that hearing aid users frequently complain about music sound quality. Yet, the effects of hearing aid amplification on musical perception abilities are largely unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effects of hearing aid amplification and dynamic range compression (DRC) settings on musical scene analysis (MSA) abilities and sound quality ratings (SQR) using polyphonic music recordings. Additionally, speech reception thresholds in noise (SRT) were measured. Thirty-three hearing aid users with moderate to severe hearing loss participated in three conditions: unaided, and aided with either slow or fast DRC settings. Overall, MSA abilities, SQR and SRT significantly improved with the use of hearing aids compared to the unaided condition. Yet, differences were observed regarding the choice of compression settings. Fast DRC led to better MSA performance, reflecting enhanced selective listening in musical mixtures, while slow DRC elicited more favorable SQR. Despite these improvements, variability in amplification benefit across DRC settings and tasks remained considerable, with some individuals showing limited or no improvement. These findings highlight a trade-off between scene transparency (indexed by MSA) and perceived sound quality, with individual differences emerging as a key factor in shaping amplification outcomes. Our results underscore the potential benefits of hearing aids for music perception and indicate the need for personalized fitting strategies tailored to task-specific demands.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Hearing\",\"volume\":\"29 \",\"pages\":\"23312165251368669\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378302/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Hearing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23312165251368669\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23312165251368669","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统上,助听器的设计是为了促进语言感知。在音乐感知方面,之前的研究表明助听器使用者经常抱怨音乐音质。然而,助听器放大对音乐感知能力的影响在很大程度上是未知的。本研究旨在探讨助听器放大和动态范围压缩(DRC)设置对音乐场景分析(MSA)能力和音质评分(SQR)的影响。此外,测量了噪声下语音接收阈值(SRT)。33名中度至重度听力损失的助听器使用者参加了三种情况的研究:无辅助,以及使用慢速或快速DRC设置辅助。总体而言,使用助听器的MSA能力,SQR和SRT与未使用助听器的情况相比显着改善。然而,在压缩设置的选择上观察到差异。快速DRC导致更好的MSA表现,反映了在音乐混合中增强的选择性聆听,而缓慢DRC引起更有利的SQR。尽管有这些改善,但在刚果民主共和国环境和任务中,放大效益的差异仍然很大,有些人表现出有限的改善或没有改善。这些发现强调了场景透明度(由MSA索引)和感知音质之间的权衡,个体差异成为影响放大效果的关键因素。我们的研究结果强调了助听器对音乐感知的潜在好处,并表明需要针对特定任务需求量身定制个性化的配套件策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Perception of Recorded Music With Hearing Aids: Compression Differentially Affects Musical Scene Analysis and Musical Sound Quality.

Perception of Recorded Music With Hearing Aids: Compression Differentially Affects Musical Scene Analysis and Musical Sound Quality.

Perception of Recorded Music With Hearing Aids: Compression Differentially Affects Musical Scene Analysis and Musical Sound Quality.

Perception of Recorded Music With Hearing Aids: Compression Differentially Affects Musical Scene Analysis and Musical Sound Quality.

Hearing aids have traditionally been designed to facilitate speech perception. With regards to music perception, previous work indicates that hearing aid users frequently complain about music sound quality. Yet, the effects of hearing aid amplification on musical perception abilities are largely unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effects of hearing aid amplification and dynamic range compression (DRC) settings on musical scene analysis (MSA) abilities and sound quality ratings (SQR) using polyphonic music recordings. Additionally, speech reception thresholds in noise (SRT) were measured. Thirty-three hearing aid users with moderate to severe hearing loss participated in three conditions: unaided, and aided with either slow or fast DRC settings. Overall, MSA abilities, SQR and SRT significantly improved with the use of hearing aids compared to the unaided condition. Yet, differences were observed regarding the choice of compression settings. Fast DRC led to better MSA performance, reflecting enhanced selective listening in musical mixtures, while slow DRC elicited more favorable SQR. Despite these improvements, variability in amplification benefit across DRC settings and tasks remained considerable, with some individuals showing limited or no improvement. These findings highlight a trade-off between scene transparency (indexed by MSA) and perceived sound quality, with individual differences emerging as a key factor in shaping amplification outcomes. Our results underscore the potential benefits of hearing aids for music perception and indicate the need for personalized fitting strategies tailored to task-specific demands.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trends in Hearing
Trends in Hearing AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGYOTORH-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Trends in Hearing is an open access journal completely dedicated to publishing original research and reviews focusing on human hearing, hearing loss, hearing aids, auditory implants, and aural rehabilitation. Under its former name, Trends in Amplification, the journal established itself as a forum for concise explorations of all areas of translational hearing research by leaders in the field. Trends in Hearing has now expanded its focus to include original research articles, with the goal of becoming the premier venue for research related to human hearing and hearing loss.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信