渐进式核心稳定训练对优秀运动员无氧表现的有效性:一项随机对照试验。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Gülşah Başandaç, Gülşah Barğı, Volga Bayrakcı Tunay
{"title":"渐进式核心稳定训练对优秀运动员无氧表现的有效性:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Gülşah Başandaç, Gülşah Barğı, Volga Bayrakcı Tunay","doi":"10.1186/s13102-025-01283-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although progressive core stabilization training (PCST) improves sport-specific abilities, the effects of PCST on anaerobic performance and fatigue are still unclear today. Therefore, this prospective, single-blind (blinded: athletes, using placebo intervention), randomized (using random selection method) controlled study aimed to investigate the presence of these effects in elite athletes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Athletes were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 30, 21.70 ± 2.71 years) and control (n = 28, 21.71 ± 2.49 years) groups in this study. While standard core strengthening exercises (SCSE) (3 days/week for a total of 9 weeks) were given to the control group, PCST (3 days/week for a total of 9 weeks) was applied to the intervention group. Anaerobic capacity, anaerobic power, and fatigue index were evaluated using 30-second (s) Wingate Anaerobic Power test and vertical jump tests. The intra-group and inter-group changes in anaerobic power, anaerobic capacity, fatigue index, and jump variables were shown using Paired Sample T Test and Independent-Samples T Test, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a 9-week training, while intra-group difference (Δ) values before and after interventions for maximum anaerobic power, maximum anaerobic capacity, anaerobic power between 0 and 5 s, anaerobic capacity between 0 and 30 s, anaerobic power values at the 5th (effect size d: 0.67), 10th and 15th sec, and vertical countermovement jump (effect size d: 0.54) increased significantly more in the intervention group compared to control group, Δ values for anaerobic power at the 20th and 25th sec increased significantly in control group compared to intervention group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in Δ values for minimum anaerobic power, 30th sec anaerobic power, fatigue index and vertical squat jump between groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCST appears to be more effective than SCSE in enhancing anaerobic capacity and early-phase anaerobic power in elite athletes. While SCSE contributes to improvements in anaerobic power during the later stages of the Wingate test, PCST provides broader and more functionally relevant gains across key performance metrics. Therefore, PCST should be prioritized and integrated into athletic training programs aimed at improving overall anaerobic performance and optimizing athletic potential in elite athletes in taekwondo, weightlifting, volleyball, and badminton.</p><p><strong>Clinical trail trial registration: </strong>This study was retrospectively registered as a clinical trial with registration number NCT06042374 on 30/08/2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":48585,"journal":{"name":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"17 1","pages":"248"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of progressive core stabilization training on anaerobic performance in elite athletes: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Gülşah Başandaç, Gülşah Barğı, Volga Bayrakcı Tunay\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13102-025-01283-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although progressive core stabilization training (PCST) improves sport-specific abilities, the effects of PCST on anaerobic performance and fatigue are still unclear today. Therefore, this prospective, single-blind (blinded: athletes, using placebo intervention), randomized (using random selection method) controlled study aimed to investigate the presence of these effects in elite athletes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Athletes were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 30, 21.70 ± 2.71 years) and control (n = 28, 21.71 ± 2.49 years) groups in this study. While standard core strengthening exercises (SCSE) (3 days/week for a total of 9 weeks) were given to the control group, PCST (3 days/week for a total of 9 weeks) was applied to the intervention group. Anaerobic capacity, anaerobic power, and fatigue index were evaluated using 30-second (s) Wingate Anaerobic Power test and vertical jump tests. The intra-group and inter-group changes in anaerobic power, anaerobic capacity, fatigue index, and jump variables were shown using Paired Sample T Test and Independent-Samples T Test, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a 9-week training, while intra-group difference (Δ) values before and after interventions for maximum anaerobic power, maximum anaerobic capacity, anaerobic power between 0 and 5 s, anaerobic capacity between 0 and 30 s, anaerobic power values at the 5th (effect size d: 0.67), 10th and 15th sec, and vertical countermovement jump (effect size d: 0.54) increased significantly more in the intervention group compared to control group, Δ values for anaerobic power at the 20th and 25th sec increased significantly in control group compared to intervention group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in Δ values for minimum anaerobic power, 30th sec anaerobic power, fatigue index and vertical squat jump between groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCST appears to be more effective than SCSE in enhancing anaerobic capacity and early-phase anaerobic power in elite athletes. While SCSE contributes to improvements in anaerobic power during the later stages of the Wingate test, PCST provides broader and more functionally relevant gains across key performance metrics. Therefore, PCST should be prioritized and integrated into athletic training programs aimed at improving overall anaerobic performance and optimizing athletic potential in elite athletes in taekwondo, weightlifting, volleyball, and badminton.</p><p><strong>Clinical trail trial registration: </strong>This study was retrospectively registered as a clinical trial with registration number NCT06042374 on 30/08/2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382201/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01283-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01283-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然渐进式核心稳定训练(PCST)可以提高运动特异性能力,但PCST对无氧表现和疲劳的影响目前尚不清楚。因此,本前瞻性、单盲(盲法:运动员,采用安慰剂干预)、随机对照(采用随机选择方法)研究旨在调查这些效应在优秀运动员中的存在。方法:将运动员随机分为干预组(n = 30, 21.70±2.71年)和对照组(n = 28, 21.71±2.49年)。对照组采用标准核心强化训练(SCSE)(每周3天,共9周),干预组采用PCST(每周3天,共9周)。采用30秒Wingate无氧能力试验和垂直跳跃试验评估无氧能力、无氧功率和疲劳指数。组内和组间无氧功率、无氧能力、疲劳指数和跳跃变量的变化分别采用配对样本T检验和独立样本T检验。结果:9周训练后,干预前后最大无氧功率、最大无氧容量、0 ~ 5秒无氧功率、0 ~ 30秒无氧容量、第5秒无氧功率值(效应量d: 0.67)、第10秒、第15秒无氧功率值、垂直反动作跳跃(效应量d: 0.67)组内差异值(Δ):0.54)显著高于对照组,对照组第20、25秒厌氧能力Δ值显著高于干预组(p 0.05)。结论:PCST在提高优秀运动员的无氧能力和早期无氧能力方面似乎比SCSE更有效。在温盖特试验的后期阶段,SCSE有助于提高厌氧功率,而PCST在关键性能指标上提供了更广泛、更功能相关的收益。因此,应优先考虑PCST,并将其纳入旨在提高跆拳道、举重、排球和羽毛球精英运动员的整体无氧表现和优化运动潜力的运动训练计划中。临床试验注册:本研究于2023年8月30日回顾性注册为临床试验,注册号为NCT06042374。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effectiveness of progressive core stabilization training on anaerobic performance in elite athletes: a randomized controlled trial.

Effectiveness of progressive core stabilization training on anaerobic performance in elite athletes: a randomized controlled trial.

Effectiveness of progressive core stabilization training on anaerobic performance in elite athletes: a randomized controlled trial.

Effectiveness of progressive core stabilization training on anaerobic performance in elite athletes: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Although progressive core stabilization training (PCST) improves sport-specific abilities, the effects of PCST on anaerobic performance and fatigue are still unclear today. Therefore, this prospective, single-blind (blinded: athletes, using placebo intervention), randomized (using random selection method) controlled study aimed to investigate the presence of these effects in elite athletes.

Methods: Athletes were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 30, 21.70 ± 2.71 years) and control (n = 28, 21.71 ± 2.49 years) groups in this study. While standard core strengthening exercises (SCSE) (3 days/week for a total of 9 weeks) were given to the control group, PCST (3 days/week for a total of 9 weeks) was applied to the intervention group. Anaerobic capacity, anaerobic power, and fatigue index were evaluated using 30-second (s) Wingate Anaerobic Power test and vertical jump tests. The intra-group and inter-group changes in anaerobic power, anaerobic capacity, fatigue index, and jump variables were shown using Paired Sample T Test and Independent-Samples T Test, respectively.

Results: After a 9-week training, while intra-group difference (Δ) values before and after interventions for maximum anaerobic power, maximum anaerobic capacity, anaerobic power between 0 and 5 s, anaerobic capacity between 0 and 30 s, anaerobic power values at the 5th (effect size d: 0.67), 10th and 15th sec, and vertical countermovement jump (effect size d: 0.54) increased significantly more in the intervention group compared to control group, Δ values for anaerobic power at the 20th and 25th sec increased significantly in control group compared to intervention group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in Δ values for minimum anaerobic power, 30th sec anaerobic power, fatigue index and vertical squat jump between groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: PCST appears to be more effective than SCSE in enhancing anaerobic capacity and early-phase anaerobic power in elite athletes. While SCSE contributes to improvements in anaerobic power during the later stages of the Wingate test, PCST provides broader and more functionally relevant gains across key performance metrics. Therefore, PCST should be prioritized and integrated into athletic training programs aimed at improving overall anaerobic performance and optimizing athletic potential in elite athletes in taekwondo, weightlifting, volleyball, and badminton.

Clinical trail trial registration: This study was retrospectively registered as a clinical trial with registration number NCT06042374 on 30/08/2023.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of sports medicine and the exercise sciences, including rehabilitation, traumatology, cardiology, physiology, and nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信