“你经常考虑你的身份”:背景下的民族-种族身份和多样性。

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Sebastian Castrechini
{"title":"“你经常考虑你的身份”:背景下的民族-种族身份和多样性。","authors":"Sebastian Castrechini","doi":"10.1002/jad.70048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Context is important to how youth develop and experience their ethnic-racial identity (ERI), but few empirical studies of ERI measure context beyond the demographic composition of settings. This study examines how youth experiences of their ERI in interactions with peers of different ethnic-racial backgrounds are shaped by the organizational context and content of interactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>I draw on ethnographic interviews with participants in the United States at a high school debate program, an activity historically dominated by white males but with increasing participation of minoritized youth. I use a sensemaking lens to examine how youth in my study (N = 8; age 13-18; 2 male, 5 female, 1 nonbinary; 4 Asian American, 1 Black, 2 Latinx, 1 White) understand the salience of and public regard for their ethnicity-race in interactions during debate competitions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The combination of the ethnic-racial composition of settings and the content of interactions influenced ERI salience. Youth made sense of public regard for their ethnic-racial group from both peers' responses to their expressions of ERI and the validation or invalidation they received from those with authority in the organization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate the importance of examining organizational norms and power that uphold or interrupt white supremacy as a critical part of the context around ERI development. The data also show that gender, social class, and other social identities were intertwined with ethnicity-race in youth's sensemaking, pointing to the need for more qualitative research that captures intersectional identities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescence","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"You Think About Your Identity a Lot\\\": Ethnic-Racial Identity and Diversity, in Context.\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Castrechini\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jad.70048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Context is important to how youth develop and experience their ethnic-racial identity (ERI), but few empirical studies of ERI measure context beyond the demographic composition of settings. This study examines how youth experiences of their ERI in interactions with peers of different ethnic-racial backgrounds are shaped by the organizational context and content of interactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>I draw on ethnographic interviews with participants in the United States at a high school debate program, an activity historically dominated by white males but with increasing participation of minoritized youth. I use a sensemaking lens to examine how youth in my study (N = 8; age 13-18; 2 male, 5 female, 1 nonbinary; 4 Asian American, 1 Black, 2 Latinx, 1 White) understand the salience of and public regard for their ethnicity-race in interactions during debate competitions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The combination of the ethnic-racial composition of settings and the content of interactions influenced ERI salience. Youth made sense of public regard for their ethnic-racial group from both peers' responses to their expressions of ERI and the validation or invalidation they received from those with authority in the organization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate the importance of examining organizational norms and power that uphold or interrupt white supremacy as a critical part of the context around ERI development. The data also show that gender, social class, and other social identities were intertwined with ethnicity-race in youth's sensemaking, pointing to the need for more qualitative research that captures intersectional identities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Adolescence\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Adolescence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.70048\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.70048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景对青年如何发展和体验他们的族裔认同(ERI)很重要,但很少有关于ERI的实证研究测量背景超出了环境的人口组成。本研究考察了青年在与不同种族背景的同龄人互动时的ERI体验是如何受到组织背景和互动内容的影响的。方法:我对美国高中辩论项目的参与者进行了人种学采访,这一活动历来由白人男性主导,但少数族裔青年的参与越来越多。在我的研究中,我使用了一个意义建构的视角来研究年轻人(N = 8; 13-18岁;2名男性,5名女性,1名非二元性别;4名亚裔美国人,1名黑人,2名拉丁裔,1名白人)如何在辩论比赛的互动中理解他们的种族和种族的重要性和公众对他们的关注。结果:民族-种族构成环境和相互作用内容的组合影响ERI显著性。年轻人从同龄人对他们ERI表达的反应和他们从组织中权威人士那里得到的认可或不认可中了解到公众对他们的种族群体的尊重。结论:这些发现表明,作为ERI发展背景的关键部分,检查维护或中断白人至上主义的组织规范和权力的重要性。数据还显示,性别、社会阶层和其他社会身份在年轻人的感知中与种族和民族交织在一起,这表明需要更多的定性研究来捕捉交叉身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"You Think About Your Identity a Lot": Ethnic-Racial Identity and Diversity, in Context.

Introduction: Context is important to how youth develop and experience their ethnic-racial identity (ERI), but few empirical studies of ERI measure context beyond the demographic composition of settings. This study examines how youth experiences of their ERI in interactions with peers of different ethnic-racial backgrounds are shaped by the organizational context and content of interactions.

Methods: I draw on ethnographic interviews with participants in the United States at a high school debate program, an activity historically dominated by white males but with increasing participation of minoritized youth. I use a sensemaking lens to examine how youth in my study (N = 8; age 13-18; 2 male, 5 female, 1 nonbinary; 4 Asian American, 1 Black, 2 Latinx, 1 White) understand the salience of and public regard for their ethnicity-race in interactions during debate competitions.

Results: The combination of the ethnic-racial composition of settings and the content of interactions influenced ERI salience. Youth made sense of public regard for their ethnic-racial group from both peers' responses to their expressions of ERI and the validation or invalidation they received from those with authority in the organization.

Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the importance of examining organizational norms and power that uphold or interrupt white supremacy as a critical part of the context around ERI development. The data also show that gender, social class, and other social identities were intertwined with ethnicity-race in youth's sensemaking, pointing to the need for more qualitative research that captures intersectional identities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Adolescence
Journal of Adolescence PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: The Journal of Adolescence is an international, broad based, cross-disciplinary journal that addresses issues of professional and academic importance concerning development between puberty and the attainment of adult status within society. It provides a forum for all who are concerned with the nature of adolescence, whether involved in teaching, research, guidance, counseling, treatment, or other services. The aim of the journal is to encourage research and foster good practice through publishing both empirical and clinical studies as well as integrative reviews and theoretical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信