Marguerite Marlow, Sarah Skeen, Junita Henry, Moroesi Makhetha, Lucie Cluver, Lorraine Sherr, Mark Tomlinson
{"title":"使用自动测量技术测量莱索托农村儿童语言环境:在一项聚类随机对照试验中对儿童及其照顾者样本的调查结果。","authors":"Marguerite Marlow, Sarah Skeen, Junita Henry, Moroesi Makhetha, Lucie Cluver, Lorraine Sherr, Mark Tomlinson","doi":"10.1037/dev0002056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The quality of the home language environment and communicative interactions between caregivers and children are crucial components of child language development. We used the Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) technology to assess children's language environments (adult word count, conversational turns, and child vocalizations) among a sample of children and their caregivers in rural Lesotho. We assessed whether a parenting intervention led to improvements in children's language environments. LENA data were collected from a randomly selected subsample of children enrolled in a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Language environment data were collected at the 12-month follow-up from 607 children (50.4% female; 28-81 months of age) and their caregivers using two different methodological approaches. For the 299 children (157 intervention; 142 control) in Sample 1 who wore the LENA device at home over 2 days, children's home language environments did not differ significantly by intervention and control conditions. For the 308 children (152 intervention; 156 control) in Sample 2 who wore the LENA device during a brief video-recorded caregiver-child interaction task, adult word count (0.4 <i>SD</i>; CI [0.026, -0.76]), conversational turns (0.31 <i>SD</i>; CI [0.03, 0.59]), and child vocalization count (0.36 <i>SD</i>; CI [0.03, 0.68]) were significantly higher during the interaction task in the intervention arm compared to the control arm. Interactions in the intervention arm were also characterized by significantly less silence. Our study demonstrates that despite the challenges it presents, measuring children's development in majority world settings remains an important priority, and that consideration of the local context should be prioritized within this research agenda. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of children's language environments using automated measurement technology in rural Lesotho: Findings from a sample of children and their caregivers in a cluster-randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Marguerite Marlow, Sarah Skeen, Junita Henry, Moroesi Makhetha, Lucie Cluver, Lorraine Sherr, Mark Tomlinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/dev0002056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The quality of the home language environment and communicative interactions between caregivers and children are crucial components of child language development. We used the Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) technology to assess children's language environments (adult word count, conversational turns, and child vocalizations) among a sample of children and their caregivers in rural Lesotho. We assessed whether a parenting intervention led to improvements in children's language environments. LENA data were collected from a randomly selected subsample of children enrolled in a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Language environment data were collected at the 12-month follow-up from 607 children (50.4% female; 28-81 months of age) and their caregivers using two different methodological approaches. For the 299 children (157 intervention; 142 control) in Sample 1 who wore the LENA device at home over 2 days, children's home language environments did not differ significantly by intervention and control conditions. For the 308 children (152 intervention; 156 control) in Sample 2 who wore the LENA device during a brief video-recorded caregiver-child interaction task, adult word count (0.4 <i>SD</i>; CI [0.026, -0.76]), conversational turns (0.31 <i>SD</i>; CI [0.03, 0.59]), and child vocalization count (0.36 <i>SD</i>; CI [0.03, 0.68]) were significantly higher during the interaction task in the intervention arm compared to the control arm. Interactions in the intervention arm were also characterized by significantly less silence. Our study demonstrates that despite the challenges it presents, measuring children's development in majority world settings remains an important priority, and that consideration of the local context should be prioritized within this research agenda. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002056\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Measurement of children's language environments using automated measurement technology in rural Lesotho: Findings from a sample of children and their caregivers in a cluster-randomized controlled trial.
The quality of the home language environment and communicative interactions between caregivers and children are crucial components of child language development. We used the Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) technology to assess children's language environments (adult word count, conversational turns, and child vocalizations) among a sample of children and their caregivers in rural Lesotho. We assessed whether a parenting intervention led to improvements in children's language environments. LENA data were collected from a randomly selected subsample of children enrolled in a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Language environment data were collected at the 12-month follow-up from 607 children (50.4% female; 28-81 months of age) and their caregivers using two different methodological approaches. For the 299 children (157 intervention; 142 control) in Sample 1 who wore the LENA device at home over 2 days, children's home language environments did not differ significantly by intervention and control conditions. For the 308 children (152 intervention; 156 control) in Sample 2 who wore the LENA device during a brief video-recorded caregiver-child interaction task, adult word count (0.4 SD; CI [0.026, -0.76]), conversational turns (0.31 SD; CI [0.03, 0.59]), and child vocalization count (0.36 SD; CI [0.03, 0.68]) were significantly higher during the interaction task in the intervention arm compared to the control arm. Interactions in the intervention arm were also characterized by significantly less silence. Our study demonstrates that despite the challenges it presents, measuring children's development in majority world settings remains an important priority, and that consideration of the local context should be prioritized within this research agenda. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.