使用自动测量技术测量莱索托农村儿童语言环境:在一项聚类随机对照试验中对儿童及其照顾者样本的调查结果。

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Marguerite Marlow, Sarah Skeen, Junita Henry, Moroesi Makhetha, Lucie Cluver, Lorraine Sherr, Mark Tomlinson
{"title":"使用自动测量技术测量莱索托农村儿童语言环境:在一项聚类随机对照试验中对儿童及其照顾者样本的调查结果。","authors":"Marguerite Marlow, Sarah Skeen, Junita Henry, Moroesi Makhetha, Lucie Cluver, Lorraine Sherr, Mark Tomlinson","doi":"10.1037/dev0002056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The quality of the home language environment and communicative interactions between caregivers and children are crucial components of child language development. We used the Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) technology to assess children's language environments (adult word count, conversational turns, and child vocalizations) among a sample of children and their caregivers in rural Lesotho. We assessed whether a parenting intervention led to improvements in children's language environments. LENA data were collected from a randomly selected subsample of children enrolled in a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Language environment data were collected at the 12-month follow-up from 607 children (50.4% female; 28-81 months of age) and their caregivers using two different methodological approaches. For the 299 children (157 intervention; 142 control) in Sample 1 who wore the LENA device at home over 2 days, children's home language environments did not differ significantly by intervention and control conditions. For the 308 children (152 intervention; 156 control) in Sample 2 who wore the LENA device during a brief video-recorded caregiver-child interaction task, adult word count (0.4 <i>SD</i>; CI [0.026, -0.76]), conversational turns (0.31 <i>SD</i>; CI [0.03, 0.59]), and child vocalization count (0.36 <i>SD</i>; CI [0.03, 0.68]) were significantly higher during the interaction task in the intervention arm compared to the control arm. Interactions in the intervention arm were also characterized by significantly less silence. Our study demonstrates that despite the challenges it presents, measuring children's development in majority world settings remains an important priority, and that consideration of the local context should be prioritized within this research agenda. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of children's language environments using automated measurement technology in rural Lesotho: Findings from a sample of children and their caregivers in a cluster-randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Marguerite Marlow, Sarah Skeen, Junita Henry, Moroesi Makhetha, Lucie Cluver, Lorraine Sherr, Mark Tomlinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/dev0002056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The quality of the home language environment and communicative interactions between caregivers and children are crucial components of child language development. We used the Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) technology to assess children's language environments (adult word count, conversational turns, and child vocalizations) among a sample of children and their caregivers in rural Lesotho. We assessed whether a parenting intervention led to improvements in children's language environments. LENA data were collected from a randomly selected subsample of children enrolled in a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Language environment data were collected at the 12-month follow-up from 607 children (50.4% female; 28-81 months of age) and their caregivers using two different methodological approaches. For the 299 children (157 intervention; 142 control) in Sample 1 who wore the LENA device at home over 2 days, children's home language environments did not differ significantly by intervention and control conditions. For the 308 children (152 intervention; 156 control) in Sample 2 who wore the LENA device during a brief video-recorded caregiver-child interaction task, adult word count (0.4 <i>SD</i>; CI [0.026, -0.76]), conversational turns (0.31 <i>SD</i>; CI [0.03, 0.59]), and child vocalization count (0.36 <i>SD</i>; CI [0.03, 0.68]) were significantly higher during the interaction task in the intervention arm compared to the control arm. Interactions in the intervention arm were also characterized by significantly less silence. Our study demonstrates that despite the challenges it presents, measuring children's development in majority world settings remains an important priority, and that consideration of the local context should be prioritized within this research agenda. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002056\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

家庭语言环境的质量和照顾者与儿童之间的交际互动是儿童语言发展的重要组成部分。我们使用语言环境分析(LENA)技术来评估莱索托农村儿童及其照顾者样本中的儿童语言环境(成人字数、会话回合和儿童发声)。我们评估了父母干预是否能改善儿童的语言环境。LENA数据是从随机选择的儿童亚样本中收集的,这些儿童参加了一项集群随机对照试验。在为期12个月的随访中,使用两种不同的方法收集了607名儿童(50.4%为女性,28-81个月大)及其照顾者的语言环境数据。对于样本1中299名在家佩戴LENA设备的儿童(干预157名,对照组142名),干预和对照条件下儿童的家庭语言环境没有显著差异。样本2中的308名儿童(干预组152名,对照组156名)在简短的视频记录的照料者与儿童互动任务中佩戴LENA设备,干预组的成人单词计数(0.4 SD; CI[0.026, -0.76])、会话次数(0.31 SD; CI[0.03, 0.59])和儿童发声计数(0.36 SD; CI[0.03, 0.68])在互动任务中显著高于对照组。干预组的相互作用也以沉默显著减少为特征。我们的研究表明,尽管存在挑战,但在大多数世界环境中衡量儿童的发展仍然是一个重要的优先事项,并且在本研究议程中应优先考虑当地环境。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measurement of children's language environments using automated measurement technology in rural Lesotho: Findings from a sample of children and their caregivers in a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

The quality of the home language environment and communicative interactions between caregivers and children are crucial components of child language development. We used the Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) technology to assess children's language environments (adult word count, conversational turns, and child vocalizations) among a sample of children and their caregivers in rural Lesotho. We assessed whether a parenting intervention led to improvements in children's language environments. LENA data were collected from a randomly selected subsample of children enrolled in a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Language environment data were collected at the 12-month follow-up from 607 children (50.4% female; 28-81 months of age) and their caregivers using two different methodological approaches. For the 299 children (157 intervention; 142 control) in Sample 1 who wore the LENA device at home over 2 days, children's home language environments did not differ significantly by intervention and control conditions. For the 308 children (152 intervention; 156 control) in Sample 2 who wore the LENA device during a brief video-recorded caregiver-child interaction task, adult word count (0.4 SD; CI [0.026, -0.76]), conversational turns (0.31 SD; CI [0.03, 0.59]), and child vocalization count (0.36 SD; CI [0.03, 0.68]) were significantly higher during the interaction task in the intervention arm compared to the control arm. Interactions in the intervention arm were also characterized by significantly less silence. Our study demonstrates that despite the challenges it presents, measuring children's development in majority world settings remains an important priority, and that consideration of the local context should be prioritized within this research agenda. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Developmental Psychology
Developmental Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.50%
发文量
329
期刊介绍: Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信