脊髓损伤患者自我效能感、自我护理、健康素养与健康相关生活质量的关系:基于回归分析的研究

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nurcan Kolaç, Seçil Taylan, İlknur Özkan
{"title":"脊髓损伤患者自我效能感、自我护理、健康素养与健康相关生活质量的关系:基于回归分析的研究","authors":"Nurcan Kolaç, Seçil Taylan, İlknur Özkan","doi":"10.1111/scs.70100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to determine the relationship between self-care ability, health literacy (HL) and self-efficacy of people with spinal cord injury (PSCI) and their quality of life (QoL); and to evaluate it within the framework of Bandura's social cognitive theory.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This descriptive and relational study was carried out among 273 PSCI. Data for the study were collected using a descriptive information form, the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (ASIA), Self Efficacy-Sufficiency Scale (SE-SS), Health Literacy Survey Europa (HLS-EU), Self-Care Agency (SCA), World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale-Brief-Turkish (WHOQOL-BREF-TR). The study investigated the predictors of QoL in PSCI using stepwise multiple linear regression analysis and discussed the findings within the framework of social cognitive theory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants' physical, mental, social and environmental subscales of the WHOQL-BREF were 6.00 ± 2.25; 7.00 ± 2.25; it was found that these scores were 6.78 ± 2.16 and 6.59 ± 2.14, respectively, and that all areas of QoL were affected. Female gender, single status, literacy level, age and ASIA injury level were found to be negative predictors of QoL. Receiving QoL counselling, high HL, self-care ability and self-efficacy were found to be positive predictors of QoL.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>It was concluded that the QoL of PSCI was related to descriptive characteristics such as marital status, gender, advanced age, level of education and their self-care ability, HL and self-efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48171,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","volume":"39 3","pages":"e70100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship Between Self-Efficacy, Self-Care, Health Literacy and Health-Related Quality of Life in People With Spinal Cord Injury: A Study Based on Regression Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Nurcan Kolaç, Seçil Taylan, İlknur Özkan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/scs.70100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to determine the relationship between self-care ability, health literacy (HL) and self-efficacy of people with spinal cord injury (PSCI) and their quality of life (QoL); and to evaluate it within the framework of Bandura's social cognitive theory.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This descriptive and relational study was carried out among 273 PSCI. Data for the study were collected using a descriptive information form, the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (ASIA), Self Efficacy-Sufficiency Scale (SE-SS), Health Literacy Survey Europa (HLS-EU), Self-Care Agency (SCA), World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale-Brief-Turkish (WHOQOL-BREF-TR). The study investigated the predictors of QoL in PSCI using stepwise multiple linear regression analysis and discussed the findings within the framework of social cognitive theory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants' physical, mental, social and environmental subscales of the WHOQL-BREF were 6.00 ± 2.25; 7.00 ± 2.25; it was found that these scores were 6.78 ± 2.16 and 6.59 ± 2.14, respectively, and that all areas of QoL were affected. Female gender, single status, literacy level, age and ASIA injury level were found to be negative predictors of QoL. Receiving QoL counselling, high HL, self-care ability and self-efficacy were found to be positive predictors of QoL.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>It was concluded that the QoL of PSCI was related to descriptive characteristics such as marital status, gender, advanced age, level of education and their self-care ability, HL and self-efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"e70100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.70100\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.70100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨脊髓损伤(PSCI)患者自我护理能力、健康素养(HL)和自我效能感与其生活质量(QoL)的关系;并在班杜拉的社会认知理论框架内对其进行评价。方法:对273篇PSCI论文进行描述性和相关性研究。研究数据的收集采用描述性信息表、美国脊髓损伤协会损伤量表(ASIA)、自我效能-充分性量表(SE-SS)、欧洲健康素养调查(HLS-EU)、自我保健机构(SCA)、世界卫生组织生活质量简易量表(WHOQOL-BREF-TR)。本研究采用逐步多元线性回归分析方法探讨PSCI患者生活质量的影响因素,并在社会认知理论的框架内进行探讨。结果:WHOQL-BREF的身体、心理、社会和环境分量表得分为6.00±2.25;7.00±2.25;结果发现,这些评分分别为6.78±2.16分和6.59±2.14分,生活质量各方面均受到影响。女性性别、单身状态、文化水平、年龄和亚洲损伤程度是生活质量的负向预测因子。接受生活质量咨询、高HL、自我照顾能力和自我效能感是生活质量的正向预测因子。讨论:PSCI患者的生活质量与婚姻状况、性别、高龄、受教育程度及其自理能力、自我效能感等描述性特征有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Relationship Between Self-Efficacy, Self-Care, Health Literacy and Health-Related Quality of Life in People With Spinal Cord Injury: A Study Based on Regression Analysis.

Objectives: This study aims to determine the relationship between self-care ability, health literacy (HL) and self-efficacy of people with spinal cord injury (PSCI) and their quality of life (QoL); and to evaluate it within the framework of Bandura's social cognitive theory.

Method: This descriptive and relational study was carried out among 273 PSCI. Data for the study were collected using a descriptive information form, the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (ASIA), Self Efficacy-Sufficiency Scale (SE-SS), Health Literacy Survey Europa (HLS-EU), Self-Care Agency (SCA), World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale-Brief-Turkish (WHOQOL-BREF-TR). The study investigated the predictors of QoL in PSCI using stepwise multiple linear regression analysis and discussed the findings within the framework of social cognitive theory.

Results: The participants' physical, mental, social and environmental subscales of the WHOQL-BREF were 6.00 ± 2.25; 7.00 ± 2.25; it was found that these scores were 6.78 ± 2.16 and 6.59 ± 2.14, respectively, and that all areas of QoL were affected. Female gender, single status, literacy level, age and ASIA injury level were found to be negative predictors of QoL. Receiving QoL counselling, high HL, self-care ability and self-efficacy were found to be positive predictors of QoL.

Discussion: It was concluded that the QoL of PSCI was related to descriptive characteristics such as marital status, gender, advanced age, level of education and their self-care ability, HL and self-efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences is an established quarterly, peer reviewed Journal with an outstanding international reputation. As the official publication of the Nordic College of Caring Science, the Journal shares their mission to contribute to the development and advancement of scientific knowledge on caring related to health, well-being, illness and the alleviation of human suffering. The emphasis is on research that has a patient, family and community focus and which promotes an interdisciplinary team approach. Of special interest are scholarly articles addressing and initiating dialogue on theoretical, empirical and methodological concerns related to critical issues. All articles are expected to demonstrate respect for human dignity and accountability to society. In addition to original research the Journal also publishes reviews, meta-syntheses and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信