性别和性别多样化人群癌症筛查的数字健康干预:范围审查。

IF 1.2 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Uma S Nair, Allison M Howard, Bárbara Piñeiro, Jennifer Kue
{"title":"性别和性别多样化人群癌症筛查的数字健康干预:范围审查。","authors":"Uma S Nair, Allison M Howard, Bárbara Piñeiro, Jennifer Kue","doi":"10.1177/15248399251358719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current research shows that participation in and adherence to cancer screening guidelines is lower in Sexual and Gender Diverse (SGD) subpopulations (also known as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender/Queer+) compared to the cisgender, heterosexual population. Digital technology-based interventions (e.g., mobile health apps, web-based, text messaging) have the potential to influence medically marginalized populations and increase engagement in health promotion behaviors. The goal of this paper was to conduct a scoping review on the impact and efficacy of digital interventions that address cancer screening in SGD populations. A scoping review protocol (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RMFDH) was designed and followed using PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus. Our search identified 127 citations with 52 identified as duplicates in Covidence, leaving 75 citations for screening. During the title/abstract review stage, two researchers independently removed 68 citations as not meeting the inclusion criteria, leaving seven (7) papers for full-text review. None of the studies met our inclusion criteria. Our findings show that despite known cancer-related health disparities in SGD populations, to date, there are no digital health interventions targeting cancer screening. This dearth indicates a gravely missed opportunity to reduce cancer health disparities in a medically marginalized and underserved population. We provide recommendations and health equity-focused conceptual frameworks to design and test digital interventions for promoting cancer screening in this medically underserved population.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399251358719"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Health Interventions for Cancer Screening in Sexual and Gender Diverse Populations: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Uma S Nair, Allison M Howard, Bárbara Piñeiro, Jennifer Kue\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15248399251358719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Current research shows that participation in and adherence to cancer screening guidelines is lower in Sexual and Gender Diverse (SGD) subpopulations (also known as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender/Queer+) compared to the cisgender, heterosexual population. Digital technology-based interventions (e.g., mobile health apps, web-based, text messaging) have the potential to influence medically marginalized populations and increase engagement in health promotion behaviors. The goal of this paper was to conduct a scoping review on the impact and efficacy of digital interventions that address cancer screening in SGD populations. A scoping review protocol (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RMFDH) was designed and followed using PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus. Our search identified 127 citations with 52 identified as duplicates in Covidence, leaving 75 citations for screening. During the title/abstract review stage, two researchers independently removed 68 citations as not meeting the inclusion criteria, leaving seven (7) papers for full-text review. None of the studies met our inclusion criteria. Our findings show that despite known cancer-related health disparities in SGD populations, to date, there are no digital health interventions targeting cancer screening. This dearth indicates a gravely missed opportunity to reduce cancer health disparities in a medically marginalized and underserved population. We provide recommendations and health equity-focused conceptual frameworks to design and test digital interventions for promoting cancer screening in this medically underserved population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15248399251358719\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399251358719\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399251358719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的研究表明,与顺性、异性恋人群相比,性和性别多样性(SGD)亚人群(也称为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人/酷儿+)对癌症筛查指南的参与和遵守程度较低。基于数字技术的干预措施(例如,移动卫生应用程序、网络、短信)有可能影响医学上边缘化的人群,并增加对健康促进行为的参与。本文的目的是对数字干预措施在SGD人群中癌症筛查的影响和有效性进行范围审查。使用PubMed、Embase、CINAHL和Scopus设计并遵循了范围审查协议(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RMFDH)。我们的搜索确定了127条引文,其中52条被确定为covid的重复,剩下75条引文供筛选。在标题/摘要评审阶段,两位研究者独立删除了68篇不符合纳入标准的引文,留下7篇论文进行全文评审。没有一项研究符合我们的纳入标准。我们的研究结果表明,尽管已知SGD人群中存在与癌症相关的健康差异,但迄今为止,还没有针对癌症筛查的数字健康干预措施。这种缺乏表明严重错过了在医疗边缘化和服务不足的人群中减少癌症健康差距的机会。我们提供建议和以健康公平为重点的概念框架,以设计和测试数字干预措施,促进在这一医疗服务不足的人群中进行癌症筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital Health Interventions for Cancer Screening in Sexual and Gender Diverse Populations: A Scoping Review.

Current research shows that participation in and adherence to cancer screening guidelines is lower in Sexual and Gender Diverse (SGD) subpopulations (also known as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender/Queer+) compared to the cisgender, heterosexual population. Digital technology-based interventions (e.g., mobile health apps, web-based, text messaging) have the potential to influence medically marginalized populations and increase engagement in health promotion behaviors. The goal of this paper was to conduct a scoping review on the impact and efficacy of digital interventions that address cancer screening in SGD populations. A scoping review protocol (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RMFDH) was designed and followed using PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus. Our search identified 127 citations with 52 identified as duplicates in Covidence, leaving 75 citations for screening. During the title/abstract review stage, two researchers independently removed 68 citations as not meeting the inclusion criteria, leaving seven (7) papers for full-text review. None of the studies met our inclusion criteria. Our findings show that despite known cancer-related health disparities in SGD populations, to date, there are no digital health interventions targeting cancer screening. This dearth indicates a gravely missed opportunity to reduce cancer health disparities in a medically marginalized and underserved population. We provide recommendations and health equity-focused conceptual frameworks to design and test digital interventions for promoting cancer screening in this medically underserved population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信