退伍军人危机一线致命手段安全试点定量评价。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Yufei Li, Jolie Bourgeois, MaryGrace Lauver, Yi-Jung Shen, Matthew Podlogar, Elizabeth Schaper, Izabela Sadej, Melissa M Garrido
{"title":"退伍军人危机一线致命手段安全试点定量评价。","authors":"Yufei Li, Jolie Bourgeois, MaryGrace Lauver, Yi-Jung Shen, Matthew Podlogar, Elizabeth Schaper, Izabela Sadej, Melissa M Garrido","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a001025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> The Veteran Crisis Line (VCL) Lethal Means Safety (LMS) Pilot offered cable gun locks or medication take-back envelopes to veteran callers at risk of suicide. <i>Aims:</i> We aimed to assess the acceptability of offering LMS interventions to these veterans and examined call outcomes, health care use, and mortality of veterans associated with acceptance of the intervention. <i>Method:</i> We assessed the acceptability of offering LMS interventions to eligible veterans who contacted the VCL between June 13, 2022, and March 31, 2023. To examine outcomes associated with acceptance of the intervention, we used inverse probability of treatment weights to balance veteran characteristics. <i>Results:</i> We found that 41.6% of veterans who were identified VHA enrollees accepted the intervention after being offered one, three times the rate of nonidentifiable veterans. Additionally, veterans who were offered any intervention, whether they accepted it or not, had a lower risk of having an emergency dispatch than those not offered one. <i>Limitations:</i> Veterans were not randomized to the intervention, so no causal inferences can be made. <i>Conclusions:</i> Our evaluation suggests that LMS interventions are acceptable to at-risk veterans. Further evaluation is needed to determine whether acceptance of an intervention has any long-term impacts on veteran outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative Evaluation of the Veteran Crisis Line Lethal Means Safety Pilot.\",\"authors\":\"Yufei Li, Jolie Bourgeois, MaryGrace Lauver, Yi-Jung Shen, Matthew Podlogar, Elizabeth Schaper, Izabela Sadej, Melissa M Garrido\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/0227-5910/a001025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> The Veteran Crisis Line (VCL) Lethal Means Safety (LMS) Pilot offered cable gun locks or medication take-back envelopes to veteran callers at risk of suicide. <i>Aims:</i> We aimed to assess the acceptability of offering LMS interventions to these veterans and examined call outcomes, health care use, and mortality of veterans associated with acceptance of the intervention. <i>Method:</i> We assessed the acceptability of offering LMS interventions to eligible veterans who contacted the VCL between June 13, 2022, and March 31, 2023. To examine outcomes associated with acceptance of the intervention, we used inverse probability of treatment weights to balance veteran characteristics. <i>Results:</i> We found that 41.6% of veterans who were identified VHA enrollees accepted the intervention after being offered one, three times the rate of nonidentifiable veterans. Additionally, veterans who were offered any intervention, whether they accepted it or not, had a lower risk of having an emergency dispatch than those not offered one. <i>Limitations:</i> Veterans were not randomized to the intervention, so no causal inferences can be made. <i>Conclusions:</i> Our evaluation suggests that LMS interventions are acceptable to at-risk veterans. Further evaluation is needed to determine whether acceptance of an intervention has any long-term impacts on veteran outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a001025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a001025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:退伍军人危机热线(VCL)致命手段安全(LMS)试点提供电缆枪锁或药物收回信封的退伍军人有自杀的风险。目的:我们旨在评估向这些退伍军人提供LMS干预的可接受性,并检查与接受干预相关的呼叫结果、医疗保健使用和退伍军人死亡率。方法:我们评估了在2022年6月13日至2023年3月31日期间接触VCL的符合条件的退伍军人提供LMS干预的可接受性。为了检查与接受干预相关的结果,我们使用治疗权重的逆概率来平衡退伍军人的特征。结果:我们发现41.6%的退伍军人在被提供一到三倍于未被确定的退伍军人的干预后接受了VHA登记。此外,接受任何干预的退伍军人,无论他们是否接受,都比没有接受干预的退伍军人有更低的紧急调度风险。局限性:退伍军人不是随机参加干预的,因此不能做出因果推论。结论:我们的评估表明,LMS干预对高危退伍军人是可以接受的。需要进一步评估,以确定接受干预是否对退伍军人的预后有任何长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative Evaluation of the Veteran Crisis Line Lethal Means Safety Pilot.

Background: The Veteran Crisis Line (VCL) Lethal Means Safety (LMS) Pilot offered cable gun locks or medication take-back envelopes to veteran callers at risk of suicide. Aims: We aimed to assess the acceptability of offering LMS interventions to these veterans and examined call outcomes, health care use, and mortality of veterans associated with acceptance of the intervention. Method: We assessed the acceptability of offering LMS interventions to eligible veterans who contacted the VCL between June 13, 2022, and March 31, 2023. To examine outcomes associated with acceptance of the intervention, we used inverse probability of treatment weights to balance veteran characteristics. Results: We found that 41.6% of veterans who were identified VHA enrollees accepted the intervention after being offered one, three times the rate of nonidentifiable veterans. Additionally, veterans who were offered any intervention, whether they accepted it or not, had a lower risk of having an emergency dispatch than those not offered one. Limitations: Veterans were not randomized to the intervention, so no causal inferences can be made. Conclusions: Our evaluation suggests that LMS interventions are acceptable to at-risk veterans. Further evaluation is needed to determine whether acceptance of an intervention has any long-term impacts on veteran outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信