以色列在不同残疾人群中个性化预算方案的前后社会心理指标的试点研究。

IF 1.2 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Ayelet Gur, Tali-Noy Hindi
{"title":"以色列在不同残疾人群中个性化预算方案的前后社会心理指标的试点研究。","authors":"Ayelet Gur, Tali-Noy Hindi","doi":"10.1037/prj0000664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The personalization in disability support emphasizes autonomy and tailored services. Individualized budget programs embody this approach, enabling participants to control resources and improve quality of life. This study, framed within self-determination theory, aimed to evaluate the contribution of Israel's individualized budget program. The analysis examined pre- and postprogram psychosocial outcomes-life satisfaction, subjective well-being, social participation, choices exercised, self-efficacy, self-esteem, and loneliness-with exploratory analyses conducted within two groups: individuals with mental health disabilities and those with physical or sensory disabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This pilot study included 21 participants enrolled in the program, with mental health (n = 15) and physical/sensory disabilities (n = 6) subgroups. Data were collected at program entry and follow-up, and paired-sample t tests were used to assess pre-post changes in psychosocial outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the total sample, significant improvements were observed in life satisfaction and subjective well-being. No significant changes were found in social participation, choices exercised, self-efficacy, self-esteem, or loneliness. Exploratory analyses within disability subgroups revealed different patterns of change across these measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for practice: </strong>The findings highlight individualized budgeting's potential to enhance psychosocial outcomes, particularly life satisfaction and subjective well-being for the total sample. Exploratory analyses within disability subgroups suggest potential differences in program benefits that warrant investigation in larger studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47875,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pilot study of pre- and postpsychosocial indicators of Israel's individualized budget program among different disability populations.\",\"authors\":\"Ayelet Gur, Tali-Noy Hindi\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/prj0000664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The personalization in disability support emphasizes autonomy and tailored services. Individualized budget programs embody this approach, enabling participants to control resources and improve quality of life. This study, framed within self-determination theory, aimed to evaluate the contribution of Israel's individualized budget program. The analysis examined pre- and postprogram psychosocial outcomes-life satisfaction, subjective well-being, social participation, choices exercised, self-efficacy, self-esteem, and loneliness-with exploratory analyses conducted within two groups: individuals with mental health disabilities and those with physical or sensory disabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This pilot study included 21 participants enrolled in the program, with mental health (n = 15) and physical/sensory disabilities (n = 6) subgroups. Data were collected at program entry and follow-up, and paired-sample t tests were used to assess pre-post changes in psychosocial outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the total sample, significant improvements were observed in life satisfaction and subjective well-being. No significant changes were found in social participation, choices exercised, self-efficacy, self-esteem, or loneliness. Exploratory analyses within disability subgroups revealed different patterns of change across these measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for practice: </strong>The findings highlight individualized budgeting's potential to enhance psychosocial outcomes, particularly life satisfaction and subjective well-being for the total sample. Exploratory analyses within disability subgroups suggest potential differences in program benefits that warrant investigation in larger studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000664\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000664","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:残疾人支持的个性化强调自主性和个性化服务。个性化预算方案体现了这种方法,使参与者能够控制资源并提高生活质量。本研究在自决理论框架内,旨在评估以色列个性化预算计划的贡献。该分析考察了项目前后的社会心理结果——生活满意度、主观幸福感、社会参与、选择、自我效能、自尊和孤独感——并对两组进行了探索性分析:有精神健康残疾的个体和有身体或感官残疾的个体。方法:本初步研究纳入了21名参与者,包括心理健康(n = 15)和身体/感觉残疾(n = 6)亚组。在项目开始和随访时收集数据,并使用配对样本t检验来评估前后社会心理结果的变化。结果:总体而言,生活满意度和主观幸福感均有显著提高。在社会参与、选择、自我效能、自尊或孤独感方面没有发现明显的变化。对残疾亚组的探索性分析揭示了这些措施的不同变化模式。结论和实践意义:研究结果强调了个性化预算的潜力,以提高社会心理结果,特别是生活满意度和主观幸福感的总样本。对残疾亚组的探索性分析表明,项目益处的潜在差异值得在更大规模的研究中进行调查。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A pilot study of pre- and postpsychosocial indicators of Israel's individualized budget program among different disability populations.

Objective: The personalization in disability support emphasizes autonomy and tailored services. Individualized budget programs embody this approach, enabling participants to control resources and improve quality of life. This study, framed within self-determination theory, aimed to evaluate the contribution of Israel's individualized budget program. The analysis examined pre- and postprogram psychosocial outcomes-life satisfaction, subjective well-being, social participation, choices exercised, self-efficacy, self-esteem, and loneliness-with exploratory analyses conducted within two groups: individuals with mental health disabilities and those with physical or sensory disabilities.

Methods: This pilot study included 21 participants enrolled in the program, with mental health (n = 15) and physical/sensory disabilities (n = 6) subgroups. Data were collected at program entry and follow-up, and paired-sample t tests were used to assess pre-post changes in psychosocial outcomes.

Results: For the total sample, significant improvements were observed in life satisfaction and subjective well-being. No significant changes were found in social participation, choices exercised, self-efficacy, self-esteem, or loneliness. Exploratory analyses within disability subgroups revealed different patterns of change across these measures.

Conclusions and implications for practice: The findings highlight individualized budgeting's potential to enhance psychosocial outcomes, particularly life satisfaction and subjective well-being for the total sample. Exploratory analyses within disability subgroups suggest potential differences in program benefits that warrant investigation in larger studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal is sponsored by the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, at Boston University"s Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences and by the US Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association (USPRA) . The mission of the Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal is to promote the development of new knowledge related to psychiatric rehabilitation and recovery of persons with serious mental illnesses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信