卫生专业人员和领导对中国姑息治疗单位常规使用以患者为中心的结果测量的看法:一项定性研究

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Yunyun Dai, Barbara A Daveson, Jinfeng Ding, Yongyi Chen, Junchen Guo, Yu Cheng, Claire Johnson
{"title":"卫生专业人员和领导对中国姑息治疗单位常规使用以患者为中心的结果测量的看法:一项定性研究","authors":"Yunyun Dai, Barbara A Daveson, Jinfeng Ding, Yongyi Chen, Junchen Guo, Yu Cheng, Claire Johnson","doi":"10.1017/S1478951525100369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A person-centered outcomes-based quality improvement program is lacking within palliative care in Mainland China. The well-established Australian Palliative Care Outcome Collaboration (PCOC) national model improves palliative care quality.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators perceived by healthcare providers to integrating the PCOC model in a Chinese hospital-based palliative care unit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using semi-structured focus group and individual interviews. A rapid deductive analysis approach was selected for data analysis. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research framework was used to guide the study design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen healthcare professionals participated in this study, four focus group interviews and five individual interviews were completed. Barriers to the PCOC integration included clinical application and workload concerns (patients in terminal stage, patients' dialects, workload concerns, and staff shortages); attitudinal barriers (negative attitudes toward PCOC); psychological barriers (numbness to their work) and barriers related to knowledge and self-efficacy (lack of knowledge, capacity, and self-efficacy in palliative care). Facilitators included adapting the program to local contexts, ongoing education and feedback, effective PCOC data use, a supportive work and clinical environment and staff's perceived advantages of the model across clinical, research and process domains.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>The successful integration of the PCOC program hinges on local adaptation, improved data utilization, education, and IT support. In regions with less developed palliative care, enhancing professionals' knowledge and self-efficacy is crucial. Incorporating assessment and clinical response protocols into technology can accelerate palliative care development and implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"e151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health professionals' and leaders' views on routine using patient-centered outcome measures in a Chinese palliative care unit: A qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Yunyun Dai, Barbara A Daveson, Jinfeng Ding, Yongyi Chen, Junchen Guo, Yu Cheng, Claire Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1478951525100369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A person-centered outcomes-based quality improvement program is lacking within palliative care in Mainland China. The well-established Australian Palliative Care Outcome Collaboration (PCOC) national model improves palliative care quality.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators perceived by healthcare providers to integrating the PCOC model in a Chinese hospital-based palliative care unit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using semi-structured focus group and individual interviews. A rapid deductive analysis approach was selected for data analysis. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research framework was used to guide the study design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen healthcare professionals participated in this study, four focus group interviews and five individual interviews were completed. Barriers to the PCOC integration included clinical application and workload concerns (patients in terminal stage, patients' dialects, workload concerns, and staff shortages); attitudinal barriers (negative attitudes toward PCOC); psychological barriers (numbness to their work) and barriers related to knowledge and self-efficacy (lack of knowledge, capacity, and self-efficacy in palliative care). Facilitators included adapting the program to local contexts, ongoing education and feedback, effective PCOC data use, a supportive work and clinical environment and staff's perceived advantages of the model across clinical, research and process domains.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>The successful integration of the PCOC program hinges on local adaptation, improved data utilization, education, and IT support. In regions with less developed palliative care, enhancing professionals' knowledge and self-efficacy is crucial. Incorporating assessment and clinical response protocols into technology can accelerate palliative care development and implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative & Supportive Care\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"e151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative & Supportive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951525100369\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951525100369","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中国大陆的姑息治疗缺乏以人为本、以结果为基础的质量改进方案。完善的澳大利亚姑息治疗结果协作(PCOC)国家模式提高了姑息治疗的质量。目的:本研究旨在探讨医疗服务提供者在中国医院姑息治疗单元整合PCOC模式时所感受到的障碍和促进因素。方法:采用半结构化的焦点小组和个别访谈进行定性描述性研究。采用快速演绎分析方法对数据进行分析。采用实施研究综合框架来指导研究设计、数据收集、分析和解释。结果:18名医护人员参与了本研究,完成了4次焦点小组访谈和5次个人访谈。PCOC整合的障碍包括临床应用和工作量问题(终末期患者、患者方言、工作量问题和人员短缺);态度障碍(对PCOC的消极态度);心理障碍(工作麻木)和与知识和自我效能相关的障碍(在姑息治疗方面缺乏知识、能力和自我效能)。促进因素包括使项目适应当地情况、持续的教育和反馈、有效的PCOC数据使用、支持性的工作和临床环境,以及员工在临床、研究和流程领域感知到的模式优势。结果的意义:PCOC项目的成功整合取决于本地适应性、改进的数据利用率、教育和IT支持。在姑息治疗欠发达的地区,提高专业人员的知识和自我效能感至关重要。将评估和临床反应方案纳入技术可以加速姑息治疗的发展和实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health professionals' and leaders' views on routine using patient-centered outcome measures in a Chinese palliative care unit: A qualitative study.

Background: A person-centered outcomes-based quality improvement program is lacking within palliative care in Mainland China. The well-established Australian Palliative Care Outcome Collaboration (PCOC) national model improves palliative care quality.

Objectives: This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators perceived by healthcare providers to integrating the PCOC model in a Chinese hospital-based palliative care unit.

Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using semi-structured focus group and individual interviews. A rapid deductive analysis approach was selected for data analysis. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research framework was used to guide the study design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation.

Results: Eighteen healthcare professionals participated in this study, four focus group interviews and five individual interviews were completed. Barriers to the PCOC integration included clinical application and workload concerns (patients in terminal stage, patients' dialects, workload concerns, and staff shortages); attitudinal barriers (negative attitudes toward PCOC); psychological barriers (numbness to their work) and barriers related to knowledge and self-efficacy (lack of knowledge, capacity, and self-efficacy in palliative care). Facilitators included adapting the program to local contexts, ongoing education and feedback, effective PCOC data use, a supportive work and clinical environment and staff's perceived advantages of the model across clinical, research and process domains.

Significance of results: The successful integration of the PCOC program hinges on local adaptation, improved data utilization, education, and IT support. In regions with less developed palliative care, enhancing professionals' knowledge and self-efficacy is crucial. Incorporating assessment and clinical response protocols into technology can accelerate palliative care development and implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信