道德推理技能:什么是道德推理技能以及如何在卫生专业教育中进一步提高道德推理技能。

IF 3.1 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Annett Wienmeister
{"title":"道德推理技能:什么是道德推理技能以及如何在卫生专业教育中进一步提高道德推理技能。","authors":"Annett Wienmeister","doi":"10.1007/s11019-025-10289-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is widely agreed that moral reasoning skills are an important aspect of ethical competency in the health professions and that students should acquire those skills. Nevertheless, ethics instructors might find it difficult to choose specific exercises and methods to further those skills because there is no shared understanding of what the term \"moral reasoning skills\" implies. As a result, there is a didactical gap between learning objective and methodology. In this paper, I demonstrate that and why the term \"moral reasoning\" is an underdetermined concept in the didactics literature of the health professions. With reference to the discipline of informal logic I will introduce a definition of the term and quality criteria for good moral reasoning that facilitate didactical interventions. I introduce three basic suggestions that instructors can follow if they want to further moral reasoning skills in students. I show how the three suggestions translate into specific learning objectives, which help instructors design exercises and choose appropriate methods for teaching and learning. Towards the end, I will discuss the critical factor of time in educational settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47449,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral reasoning skills: what they are and how they can be furthered in health professions education.\",\"authors\":\"Annett Wienmeister\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11019-025-10289-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It is widely agreed that moral reasoning skills are an important aspect of ethical competency in the health professions and that students should acquire those skills. Nevertheless, ethics instructors might find it difficult to choose specific exercises and methods to further those skills because there is no shared understanding of what the term \\\"moral reasoning skills\\\" implies. As a result, there is a didactical gap between learning objective and methodology. In this paper, I demonstrate that and why the term \\\"moral reasoning\\\" is an underdetermined concept in the didactics literature of the health professions. With reference to the discipline of informal logic I will introduce a definition of the term and quality criteria for good moral reasoning that facilitate didactical interventions. I introduce three basic suggestions that instructors can follow if they want to further moral reasoning skills in students. I show how the three suggestions translate into specific learning objectives, which help instructors design exercises and choose appropriate methods for teaching and learning. Towards the end, I will discuss the critical factor of time in educational settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-025-10289-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-025-10289-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们普遍认为,道德推理技能是卫生专业道德能力的一个重要方面,学生应该掌握这些技能。然而,道德导师可能会发现很难选择具体的练习和方法来进一步提高这些技能,因为对“道德推理技能”一词的含义没有共同的理解。因此,在学习目标和学习方法之间存在着教学上的差距。在本文中,我证明了这一点,以及为什么“道德推理”一词在卫生专业的教学文献中是一个不确定的概念。关于非正式逻辑的学科,我将介绍促进教学干预的良好道德推理的术语和质量标准的定义。我介绍了三个基本建议,如果教师想要进一步提高学生的道德推理能力,他们可以遵循这些建议。我展示了这三个建议如何转化为具体的学习目标,帮助教师设计练习和选择适当的教学方法。最后,我将讨论时间在教育环境中的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moral reasoning skills: what they are and how they can be furthered in health professions education.

It is widely agreed that moral reasoning skills are an important aspect of ethical competency in the health professions and that students should acquire those skills. Nevertheless, ethics instructors might find it difficult to choose specific exercises and methods to further those skills because there is no shared understanding of what the term "moral reasoning skills" implies. As a result, there is a didactical gap between learning objective and methodology. In this paper, I demonstrate that and why the term "moral reasoning" is an underdetermined concept in the didactics literature of the health professions. With reference to the discipline of informal logic I will introduce a definition of the term and quality criteria for good moral reasoning that facilitate didactical interventions. I introduce three basic suggestions that instructors can follow if they want to further moral reasoning skills in students. I show how the three suggestions translate into specific learning objectives, which help instructors design exercises and choose appropriate methods for teaching and learning. Towards the end, I will discuss the critical factor of time in educational settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy: A European Journal is the official journal of the European Society for Philosophy of Medicine and Health Care. It provides a forum for international exchange of research data, theories, reports and opinions in bioethics and philosophy of medicine. The journal promotes interdisciplinary studies, and stimulates philosophical analysis centered on a common object of reflection: health care, the human effort to deal with disease, illness, death as well as health, well-being and life. Particular attention is paid to developing contributions from all European countries, and to making accessible scientific work and reports on the practice of health care ethics, from all nations, cultures and language areas in Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信