塞米单抗治疗晚期眼周结膜癌和皮肤鳞状细胞癌:英国病例系列。

IF 0.8 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Mumta Kanda, Nirodha Jayawickrema, Indran Davagnanam, Emma Samia-Aly, Tarang Gupta, Claire Daniel
{"title":"塞米单抗治疗晚期眼周结膜癌和皮肤鳞状细胞癌:英国病例系列。","authors":"Mumta Kanda, Nirodha Jayawickrema, Indran Davagnanam, Emma Samia-Aly, Tarang Gupta, Claire Daniel","doi":"10.1080/01676830.2025.2551617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the real-world efficacy, safety, and outcomes of cemiplimab for advanced periocular conjunctival and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective case series of adults treated with cemiplimab for periocular conjunctival or cutaneous SCC at Moorfields Eye Hospital (2021-2025).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 9 patients (mean age 66, range 43-79; 56% female; 78% Caucasian). Prior treatments included surgery (44%), radiotherapy (22%), and one exenteration. Tumour origin was conjunctival (56%), cutaneous (33%), or unknown (11%). 8 (89%) showed orbital invasion, including 2 with intracranial spread. Cemiplimab was indicated when surgery was refused or as palliative treatment in cases not amenable to localized treatment. Mean cemiplimab duration was 12.3 months (range 2.1-36.4). Immune-related adverse events included grade 2 hypothyroidism (<i>n</i> = 2, continued therapy) and grade 2 hepatitis (<i>n</i> = 1, discontinued). Complete and partial responses were seen in 22% and 33%, respectively; 44% progressed. No significant difference in response was observed between conjunctival and cutaneous SCC (<i>p</i> = 1.00). 2 patients (22%) underwent exenteration after starting treatment. Average total follow-up was 50.8 months (range 17.4-130.6). One recurrence occurred 12 months after treatment cessation; no new metastases were reported during follow-up. Two patients died from unrelated causes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To our knowledge, this is the largest single case series of cemiplimab used in conjunctival SCC. Our results underscore the potential of cemiplimab as globe-sparing and vision-preserving treatment in advanced periocular conjunctival and cutaneous SCC, including more aggressive and complex cases with intracranial involvement or perineural spread, both as primary treatment and after previous surgery in recurrent cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":47421,"journal":{"name":"Orbit-The International Journal on Orbital Disorders-Oculoplastic and Lacrimal Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cemiplimab in advanced periocular conjunctival and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a United Kingdom case series.\",\"authors\":\"Mumta Kanda, Nirodha Jayawickrema, Indran Davagnanam, Emma Samia-Aly, Tarang Gupta, Claire Daniel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01676830.2025.2551617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the real-world efficacy, safety, and outcomes of cemiplimab for advanced periocular conjunctival and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective case series of adults treated with cemiplimab for periocular conjunctival or cutaneous SCC at Moorfields Eye Hospital (2021-2025).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 9 patients (mean age 66, range 43-79; 56% female; 78% Caucasian). Prior treatments included surgery (44%), radiotherapy (22%), and one exenteration. Tumour origin was conjunctival (56%), cutaneous (33%), or unknown (11%). 8 (89%) showed orbital invasion, including 2 with intracranial spread. Cemiplimab was indicated when surgery was refused or as palliative treatment in cases not amenable to localized treatment. Mean cemiplimab duration was 12.3 months (range 2.1-36.4). Immune-related adverse events included grade 2 hypothyroidism (<i>n</i> = 2, continued therapy) and grade 2 hepatitis (<i>n</i> = 1, discontinued). Complete and partial responses were seen in 22% and 33%, respectively; 44% progressed. No significant difference in response was observed between conjunctival and cutaneous SCC (<i>p</i> = 1.00). 2 patients (22%) underwent exenteration after starting treatment. Average total follow-up was 50.8 months (range 17.4-130.6). One recurrence occurred 12 months after treatment cessation; no new metastases were reported during follow-up. Two patients died from unrelated causes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To our knowledge, this is the largest single case series of cemiplimab used in conjunctival SCC. Our results underscore the potential of cemiplimab as globe-sparing and vision-preserving treatment in advanced periocular conjunctival and cutaneous SCC, including more aggressive and complex cases with intracranial involvement or perineural spread, both as primary treatment and after previous surgery in recurrent cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orbit-The International Journal on Orbital Disorders-Oculoplastic and Lacrimal Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orbit-The International Journal on Orbital Disorders-Oculoplastic and Lacrimal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2025.2551617\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orbit-The International Journal on Orbital Disorders-Oculoplastic and Lacrimal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2025.2551617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价头孢米单抗治疗晚期眼周结膜癌和皮肤鳞状细胞癌(SCC)的实际疗效、安全性和结局。方法:对2021-2025年在Moorfields眼科医院接受西米单抗治疗眼周结膜或皮肤鳞状细胞癌的成人病例进行回顾性分析。结果:我们纳入9例患者(平均年龄66岁,43-79岁,56%为女性,78%为高加索人)。之前的治疗包括手术(44%),放疗(22%)和一次穿刺。肿瘤来源为结膜(56%)、皮肤(33%)或未知(11%)。8例(89%)眼眶侵犯,其中2例颅内扩散。当手术被拒绝或作为姑息性治疗不适合于局部治疗的病例时,使用塞米普利单抗。平均西米单抗持续时间为12.3个月(2.1-36.4个月)。免疫相关不良事件包括2级甲状腺功能减退(n = 2,继续治疗)和2级肝炎(n = 1,停止治疗)。完全缓解和部分缓解分别为22%和33%;44%的进展。结膜SCC和皮肤SCC的疗效无显著差异(p = 1.00)。2例(22%)患者在开始治疗后进行了拔肠术。平均总随访时间为50.8个月(17.4 ~ 130.6)。1例复发发生在停止治疗12个月后;随访期间未发现新的转移灶。两名患者死于无关原因。结论:据我们所知,这是在结膜SCC中使用的最大的单例头孢米单抗系列。我们的研究结果强调了在晚期眼周结膜和皮肤鳞状细胞癌中,包括更具侵袭性和复杂的颅内累及或神经周围扩散的病例,无论是作为初级治疗还是在既往手术后复发的病例,西米单抗都有保留全局和视力的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cemiplimab in advanced periocular conjunctival and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a United Kingdom case series.

Purpose: To evaluate the real-world efficacy, safety, and outcomes of cemiplimab for advanced periocular conjunctival and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

Methods: Retrospective case series of adults treated with cemiplimab for periocular conjunctival or cutaneous SCC at Moorfields Eye Hospital (2021-2025).

Results: We included 9 patients (mean age 66, range 43-79; 56% female; 78% Caucasian). Prior treatments included surgery (44%), radiotherapy (22%), and one exenteration. Tumour origin was conjunctival (56%), cutaneous (33%), or unknown (11%). 8 (89%) showed orbital invasion, including 2 with intracranial spread. Cemiplimab was indicated when surgery was refused or as palliative treatment in cases not amenable to localized treatment. Mean cemiplimab duration was 12.3 months (range 2.1-36.4). Immune-related adverse events included grade 2 hypothyroidism (n = 2, continued therapy) and grade 2 hepatitis (n = 1, discontinued). Complete and partial responses were seen in 22% and 33%, respectively; 44% progressed. No significant difference in response was observed between conjunctival and cutaneous SCC (p = 1.00). 2 patients (22%) underwent exenteration after starting treatment. Average total follow-up was 50.8 months (range 17.4-130.6). One recurrence occurred 12 months after treatment cessation; no new metastases were reported during follow-up. Two patients died from unrelated causes.

Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the largest single case series of cemiplimab used in conjunctival SCC. Our results underscore the potential of cemiplimab as globe-sparing and vision-preserving treatment in advanced periocular conjunctival and cutaneous SCC, including more aggressive and complex cases with intracranial involvement or perineural spread, both as primary treatment and after previous surgery in recurrent cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
136
期刊介绍: Orbit is the international medium covering developments and results from the variety of medical disciplines that overlap and converge in the field of orbital disorders: ophthalmology, otolaryngology, reconstructive and maxillofacial surgery, medicine and endocrinology, radiology, radiotherapy and oncology, neurology, neuroophthalmology and neurosurgery, pathology and immunology, haematology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信